State of the art review of inspection technologies for condition assessment of water pipes

Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 1-15

  Liu, Zheng ^a   Kleiner, Yehuda ^a  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Deterioration; Distress indicator; Non destructive inspection; Pipe condition assessment

Indexed keywords

AUGMENTED REALITY; CONDITION MONITORING; DETERIORATION; TECHNOLOGY; WATER PIPING SYSTEMS; WATER QUALITY;

CATASTROPHIC FAILURES; CONDITION ASSESSMENTS; DATA AND INFORMATION; HYDRAULIC CAPACITY; INSPECTION TECHNIQUE; INSPECTION TECHNOLOGY; NON DESTRUCTIVE INSPECTION; SENSOR TECHNIQUES; STATE-OF-THE-ART REVIEWS; STRUCTURAL DETERIORATION; STRUCTURAL HEALTH; TRANSMISSION MAIN; WATER DISTRIBUTIONS; WATER PIPES;

WATER PIPELINES;

EID: 84870251757     PISSN: 02632241     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2012.05.032     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. B. Rajani, Y. Kleiner, Non-destructive inspection techniques to determine structural distress indicators in water mains, in: Evaluation and Control of Water Loss in Urban Water Networks, Valencia, Spain, 2004, pp. 1-20.
2. B. Rajani, Y. Kleiner, and R. Sadiq Translation of pipe inspection results into condition ratings using the fuzzy synthetic evaluation technique Journal of Water Supply Research and Technology 55 1 2006 11 24
3. O. Duran, K. Althoefer, and L.D. Seneviratne State of the art in sensor technologies for sewer inspection IEEE Sensors Journal 2 2 2002 73 81
4. D. Marlow, S. Heart, S. Burn, A. Urquhart, S. Gould, M. Anderson, S. Cook, M. Ambrose, B. Madin, A. Fitzgerald, Condition Assessment Strategies and Protocols for Water and Wastewater Utility Assets, Tech. Rep.; Water Environment Research Foundation, 2007.
5. J. Thomson, White Paper on Condition Assessment of Ferrous Water Transmission and Distribution Systems, Tech. Rep.; The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
6. J.C. Thomson, R.S. Morrison, T. Sangster, Inspection Guidelines for Wastewater Force Mains, Tech. Rep.; Water Environment Research Foundation, 2010, doi:04-CTS-6URa.
7. Z. Liu, and Y. Kleiner State of the art review of technologies for pipe structual health monitoring IEEE Sensors Journal 12 6 2012 1987 1992
8. O. Hunaidi, Condition assessment of water pipes, in: Proceedings of EPA Workshop on Innovation and Research for Water Infrastructure in the 21st Century, Arlington, Virginia, USA, 2006, pp. 1-6.
9. Hydraomax, Sset Inspection: Side Scanning Evaluation Technology, 2006, < http://www.hydromaxusa.com/SSET.htm >.
10. RapidView, Panoramo 3d Optical Scanner, 2007, < http://www.rapidview. com/panoramo.htm >.
11. Acuity, Principles of Measurement Used by Laser Sensor, 2008, < http://www.acuitylaser.com/resources/principles-measurement.shtml >.
12. RedZone, 2D vs 3D Lasers in Large Pipes, < http://www.redzone.com > (retrieved June 2011).
13. Creafrom, 2008, < http://www.creaform3d.com > (retrieved December 2011).
14. J.W. Wilson, M. Kaba, G.Y. Tian, New techniques for the quantification of defects through pulsed magnetic flux leakage, in: Proceedings of 17th World Conference on Nondestructive Testing, Shanghai, China, 2008.
15. B. Crouse, 2009, NDT Resource Center, < http://www.ndt-ed.org > (retrieved May 2011).
16. B. Mergelas, X. Kong, Electromagnetic Inspection of Prestressed Concrete Pressure Pipe, Awwa Research Foundation and American Water Works Association, 2001.
17. Russell, See Snake Brochure, see Snake Brochure, 2009.
18. G. Hazelden, G. Ragula, M. Roubal, The use of broadband electromagnetic technology for integrity inspection of a 760 mm (30 in.) cast iron and steel line, in: Proceedings of the 22nd World Gas Conference, Tokyo, Japan, 2003.
19. C.S. Feeney, S. Thayer, M. Bonomo, K. Martel, State of Technology Review Report on Condition Assessment of Wastewater Collection Systems, Tech. Rep.; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA, 2009.
20. C. Waters, Rtd-incotest - For the Detection of Corrosion under Insulation, 2005, < http://www.pndt.com.au >.
21. Applus RTD, Pulsed Eddy Current System - incotest, 2008, < http://www.mbinspection.co.uk/index/incotest >.
22. S.B. Costello, D.N. Chapman, C.D.F. Rogers, and N. Metje Underground asset location and condition assessment technologies Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 22 2007 524 542
23. O. Hunaidi, P. Giamou, Ground-penetrating radar for detection of leaks in buried plastic water distribution pipes, in: Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Ground-Penetrating Radar, Lawrence, Kansas, USA, 1998.
24. P.G. Slaats, G.A. Mesman, L.P. Rosenthal, and H. Brink Tools to monitor corrosion of cement-containing water mains Water Science and Technology 49 2 2004 33 39
25. WATERPIPE, Integrated High Resolution Imaging Ground Penetrating Radar and Decision Support System for Water Pipeline Rehabilitation, 2009, < http://www.waterpipe-eu.org >.
26. E.N. Allouche, Computer aided tomography: Inspecting buried structures from inside out, in: 7th Annual Tulane Engineering Forum, New Orleans, USA, 2007.
27. A. Jaganathan, E. Allouche, N. Simicevic, Pipeline scanning: Novel Technology for Detection of Voids and Internal Defects in Non-conductive Buried Pipes, 2006.
28. CUES, Sonar Profiler System for Submerged and Semi-Submerged Pipes, 2008, < http://www.cuesinc.com/Sonar-Profiler.html >.
29. RedZone, Multi-frequency Sonar: Fine Tuning Your Pipe Inspection System, 2008, < http://www.redzone.com/education/multi-frequency-sonar >.
30. D.A. Sack, L.D. Olson, Impact echo testing of in situ precast concrete cylinder pipe, in: Proceedings of the 1998 Pipeline Division Conference: Pipelines in the Constructed Environment, American Society of Civil Engineers, San Diego, CA, USA, 1998, pp. 250-259.
31. M.J. Sansalone, W.B. Streett, The Impact-echo Method, 1998, < http://www.ndt.net/article/0298/streett/streett.htm >.
32. PureTechnologies, Smartball for Water Leak Detection, 2009, < http://www.puretechnologiesltd.com >.
33. R. Fletcher, Smartball - a new approach in pipeline leak detection, in: International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 2008.
34. S.T. Ariaratnam, M. Chandrasekaran, Development of a Free-swimming Acoustic Tool for Liquid Pipeline Leak Ddetection Including Evaluation for Natural Gas Pipeline Applications, Technical Report DTPH56-07-BAA-000002, Arizona State University and Pure Technologies Limited, prepared for US DPT PHMSA, August 2010.
35. B. Mergelas, G. Henrich, Leak locating method for pre-commissioned transmission pipelines: North american case studies, in: Proceedings of Leakage Conference, Halifax, Canada, 2005, Leakage 2005.
36. PPIC, Transmission Main Leak Location (Sahara), 2006, < http://www.ppic.com/l >.
37. O. Hunaidi, A. Wang, M. Bracken, T. Gambino, C. Fricke, Acoustic methods for locating leaks in municipal water pipe networks, in: Proceedings of International Conference on Water Demand Management, Dead Sea, Jordan, 2004.
38. O. Hunaidi, Non-destructive Testing of Pipes, 2006.
39. J.L. Rose, J. Mu, Y. Cho, Recent advances on guided waves in pipe inspection, in: Proceedings of World Conference on Nondestructive Testing, Shanghai, China, 2008.
40. W. Luo, and J.L. Rose Guided wave thickness measurement with EMATs Insight 45 11 2003 1 5
41. J. Bosch, A. Hugger, J. Franz, and S. Falter Phase array technology for automated pipeline inspection Business Briefing: Exploration and Production - The Oil & Gas Review 2004 1 4
42. P.O. Moore (Ed.), Nondestructive Testing Handbook: Ultrasonic Testing, vol. 7. American Society for Nondestructive Testing Inc.; Columbus, OH, USA, 2007.
43. R/D Tech Corp.; Phased Array Technical Guidelines: Useful Formulas, Graphs, and Examples.
44. M. Beller, A. Barbian, Combined in-line inspection of pipelines for metal loss and cracks, in: Proceedings of European Conference on Nondestructive Testing, Berlin, Germany, 2006.
45. Inversa Systems, Backscatter Computed Tomography, < http://www.inversasystems.com > (retrieved December 2011).
46. ANSI/AWWA C105/A21.5-99, American National Standard for Polyethylene Encasement for Ductile-IronPipe Systems, American Water Works Association, 1999.
47. Metalogic, 2003, < http://www.metalogic.be/ >.
48. B. Spickelmire Corrosion consideration for ductile iron pipe Materials Performance 41 2002 16 23
49. R. Sadiq, B. Rajani, and Y. Kleiner Fuzzy-based method to evaluate soil corrosivity for prediction of water main deterioration Journal of Infrastructure Systems 10 4 2004 149 156
50. H. Najjaran, R. Sadiq, and B. Rajani Fuzzy expert system to assess corrosivity of cast/ductile iron pipes frombackfill properties Computer Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 21 1 2006 67 77
51. Z. Liu, R. Sadiq, B. Rajani, and H. Najjaran Exploring the relationship between soil properties and deterioration of metallic pipes using predictive data mining methods Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 24 3 2010 289 301
52. SINTEF, Smart Pipe Project, 2008, < http://www.sintef.no/Projectweb/ SmartPipe/The-SmartPipe-development-project/ >.
53. S.W. Lawson, J.R. Pretlove, Augmented reality for underground pipe inspection and maintenance, in: M.R. Stein (Ed.), SPIE Proceedings of Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies V, vol. 3524, 1998, pp. 98-104.
54. H. Schempf, In-pipe-assessment Robot Platforms, Tech. Rep.; The Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2004.
55. A. Jamoussi, Robotic nde: a new solution for in-line pipe inspection, in: 3rd Middle East Nondestructive Testing Conference and Exhibition, Bahrain, Manama, 2005.
56. R. Kirham, P.D. Kearney, K.J. Rogers, and J. Mashford pIRAT - a system for quantitative sewer pipe assessment The International Journal of Robotics Research 19 11 2000 1033 1053
57. H.B. Kuntze, H. Haffner, Experiences with the development of a robot for smart multisensoric pipe inspection, in: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Leuven, Belgium, 1998.
58. F. Kirchner, and J. Hertzberg A prototype study of an autonomous robot platform for sewerage system maintenance Autonomous Robots 4 1997 319 331
59. A.A.E. Nassiraei, Y. Kawamura, A. Ahrary, Y. Mikuriya, K. Ishii, A new approach to the sewer pipe inspection: fully autonomous mobile robot kantaro, in: Proceedings of the 32nd IEEE Annual Conference on Industrial Electronics, 2006.
60. E. Rome, J. Hertzberg, F. Kirchner, U. Licht, and T. Christaller Towards autonomous sewer robots: the MAKRO project Urban Water 1 1999 57 70
61. G.C. Vradis, W. Leary, Development of an Inspection Platform and a Suite of Sensors for Assessing Corrosion and Mechanical Damage on Unpiggable Transmission Mains, Tech. Rep.; Northeast Gas Association, 2004.
62. H. Schempf, Explorer-ii: Wireless Self-powered Visual and NDE Robotic Inspection System for Live Gas Distribution Mains, Tech. Rep.; Carnegie Mellon University, 2006.
63. http://www.inspector-systems.com/.
64. M. Clay, Super-pig for Cast Iron Pipe Inspection, personal communication, 2009.
65. J. Moraleda, A. Ollero, and M. Orte A robotic system for internal inspection of water pipelines IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine 6 3 1999 30 41
66. W. Jappy, PipeDiver: Condition Assessment Without Shutdown, April 2012, < http://www.civil.uwaterloo.ca/catt/Pdfs/ >.