Predictive factors of hospital stay in patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and instrumentation

Spine

Volumn 37, Issue 24, 2012, Pages 2046-2054

  Siemionow, Krzysztof ^a   Pelton, Miguel A ^b   Hoskins, Jonathan A ^b   Singh, Kern ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

fluids; length of stay; lumbar; MIS TLIF; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Indexed keywords

CREATININE; HEMOGLOBIN; OXYCODONE; OXYGEN;

ADULT; BLEEDING; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; FEMALE; HEMOGLOBIN BLOOD LEVEL; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SPINE FUSION; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE TIME; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84870243784     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31825c6688     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI, et al. Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA 2010; 303:1259-65.
2. Cherkin DC, Deyo RA, Loeser JD, et al. An international comparison of back surgery rates. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994; 19:1201-6.
3. Taylor VM, Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, et al. Low back pain hospital-ization. Recent United States trends and regional variations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994; 19:1207-12; discussion 13.
4. Guiot BH, Khoo L T, Fessler RG. A minimally invasive technique for decompression of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002; 27:432-8.
5. German JW, Foley KT. Minimal access surgical techniques in the management of the painful lumbar motion segment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30: S52-9.
6. Scheufl er KM, Dohmen H, Vougioukas VI. Percutaneous trans-foraminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar instability. Neurosurgery 2007; 60:203-12; discussion 12-3.
7. Shunwu F, Xing Z, Fengdong Z, et al. Minimally invasive transfo-raminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35:1615-20.
8. Hillebrecht A, Schulz H, Meyer M, et al. Pulmonary responses to lower body negative pressure and fl uid loading during head-down tilt bedrest. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl 1992; 604:35-42.
9. Holte K, Foss NB, Andersen J, et al. Liberal or restrictive fl uid administration in fast-track colonic surgery: a randomized, doubleblind study. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99:500-8.
10. McArdle GT, Price G, Lewis A, et al. Positive fl uid balance is associated with complications after elective open infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007; 34:522-7.
11. Toraman F, Evrenkaya S, Yuce M, et al. Highly positive intraoperative fl uid balance during cardiac surgery is associated with adverse outcome. Perfusion 2004; 19:85-91.
12. Nahtomi-Shick O, Kostuik JP, Winters BD, et al. Does intraoperative fl uid management in spine surgery predict intensive care unit length of stay? J Clin Anesth 2001; 13:208-12.
13. Siemionow K, Cywinski J, Kusza K, et al. Intraoperative fl uid therapy and pulmonary complications. Orthopedics 2012; 35: e184-91.
14. Frank SM, Beattie C, Christopherson R, et al. Unintentional hypothermia is associated with postoperative myocardial ischemia. The Perioperative Ischemia Randomized Anesthesia Trial Study Group. Anesthesiology 1993; 78:468-76.
15. Frank SM, Higgins MS, Breslow MJ, et al. The catecholamine, cortisol, and hemodynamic responses to mild perioperative hypothermia. A randomized clinical trial. Anesthesiology 1995; 82:83-93.
16. Heier T, Caldwell JE, Sessler DI, et al. Mild intraoperative hypothermia increases duration of action and spontaneous recovery of vecuronium blockade during nitrous oxide-isofl urane anesthesia in humans. Anesthesiology 1991; 74:815-9.
17. Jurkovich GJ, Greiser WB, Luterman A, et al. Hypothermia in trauma victims: an ominous predictor of survival. J Trauma 1987; 27:1019-24.
18. Kurz A, Sessler DI, Lenhardt R. Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hos-pitalization. Study of Wound Infection and Temperature Group. N Engl J Med 1996; 334:1209-15.
19. Sharkey A, Gulden RH, Lipton JM, et al. Effect of radiant heat on the metabolic cost of postoperative shivering. Br J Anaesth 1993; 70:449-50.
20. Valeri CR, Khabbaz K, Khuri SF, et al. Effect of skin temperature on platelet function in patients undergoing extracorporeal bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992; 104:108-16.
21. Woolf CJ, Salter MW. Neuronal plasticity: increasing the gain in pain. Science 2000; 288:1765-9.
22. Moiniche S, Kehlet H, Dahl JB. A qualitative and quantitative systematic review of preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain relief: the role of timing of analgesia. Anesthesiology 2002; 96:725-41.
23. Woolf CJ, Chong MS. Preemptive analgesia-treating postoperative pain by preventing the establishment of central sensitization. Anesth Analg 1993; 77:362-79.
24. Sekar C, Rajasekaran S, Kannan R, et al. Preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain relief in lumbosacral spine surgeries: a randomized controlled trial. Spine J 2004; 4:261-4.
25. Yukawa Y, Kato F, Ito K, et al. A case-control study of preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain in patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion: continuous subcutaneous morphine alone and combined with intrathecal injection. J Spinal Disord Tech 2010; 23:333-7.
26. Yukawa Y, Kato F, Ito K, et al. A prospective randomized study of preemptive for postoperative pain in the patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion: continuous subcutaneous morphine, continuous epidural morphine, and diclofenacsodium. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30:2357-61.
27. Halpin RJ, Sugrue PA, Gould RW, et al. Standardizing care for high-risk patients in spine surgery: the Northwestern high-risk spine protocol. Spine 2010; 35:2232-8.
28. Dhall SS, Wang MY, Mummaneni PV. Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 2008; 9:560-5.
29. Schizas C, Tzinieris N, Tsiridis E, et al. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience. Int Orthop 2009; 33:1683-8.
30. Peng CW, Yue WM, Poh SY, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 2009; 34:1385-9.
31. Wang J, Zhou Y, Zhang ZF, et al. Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2. Eur Spine J 2010; 19:1780-4.
32. Shunwu F, Xing Z, Fengdong Z, et al. Minimally invasive trans-foraminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases. Spine 2010; 35:1615-20.
33. Villavicencio A T, Burneikiene S, Roeca CM, et al. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Surg Neurol Int 2010; 1:12.
34. Adogwa O, Parker SL, Bydon A, et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion:2-year assessment of narcotic use, return to work, disability, and quality of life. J Spinal Disord Tech 2011; 24:479-84.