Algebraic geometry of 2×2 contingency tables

Algebraic and Geometric Methods in Statistics

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 63-82

  Slavković, Aleksandra B ^a   Fienberg, Stephen E ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870216018     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511642401.004     Document Type: Chapter

References (39)

1. Arnold, B., Castillo, E. and Sarabia, J. M. (1996). Specification of distributions by combinations of marginal and conditional distributions, Statistics and Probability Letters 26, 153-57.
2. Arnold, B., Castillo, E. and Sarabia, J. M. (1999). Conditional Specification of Statistical Models, (New York, Springer-Verlag).
3. Besag, J. (1974). Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems (with discussion), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 36, 192-236.
4. Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E. and Holland, P. W. (1975). Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press). Reprinted (2007) (New York, Springer-Verlag).
5. Carlini, E. and Rapallo, F. (2005). The geometry of statistical models for two-way contingency tables with fixed odds ratios, Rendiconti dell’Istituto di Matematica dell’Universita di Trieste 37, 71-84.
6. De Rooij, M. and Anderson, C.J. (2007). Visualizing, summarizing, and comparing odds ratio structures, Methodology 3, 139-48.
7. De Rooij, M., and Heiser, W. J. (2005). Graphical representations and odds ratios in a distance-association model for the analysis of cross-classified data, Psychometrika 70, 99-123.
8. Diaconis, P. (1977). Finite forms of de Finetti’s theorem on exchangeability, Synthese 36, 271-81.
9. Diaconis, P. and Sturmfels, B. (1998).Algebraic algorithms for sampling from conditional distributions, Annals of Statistics 26(1), 363-97.
10. Dobra, A. (2001). Statistical tools for disclosure limitation in multi-way contingency tables. PhD thesis, Department of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon University.
11. Dobra, A. (2003). Markov bases for decomposable graphical models, Bernoulli 9(6), 1-16.
12. Edgeworth, F. Y. (1914). On the use of analytical geometry to represent certain kinds of statistics, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 77, 838-52.
13. Erosheva, E. A. (2005). Comparing latent structures of the grade of membership, Rasch, and latent class models, Psychometrika 70, 619-28.
14. Fienberg, S. E. (1968). The geometry of an r xc contingency table, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 39, 1186-90.
15. Fienberg, S. E. (1970). An iterative procedure for estimation in contingency tables, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 41, 907-17. Corrigenda 42, 1778.
16. Fienberg, S. E. and Gilbert, J. P. (1970). The geometry of a two by two contingency table, Journal of the American Statistical Association 65, 694-701.
17. Fienberg, S. E. (1980). The Analysis of Cross-Classified Categorical Data 2nd edn (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press). Reprinted (2007) (New York, Springer-Verlag).
18. Fisher, R. A. (1921). On the interpretation of yf from contingency tables, and the calculation of P, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 85, 87-94.
19. Flach, P. A. (2003). The geometry of ROC space: understanding machine learning metrics through ROC isometrics, In Proc. ICML-2003, Washington DC, 194-201.
20. Gelman, A. and Speed, T. P. (1993). Characterizing a joint probability distribution by conditionals, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B 55, 185-8. Corrigendum 6, 483 (1993).
21. Good, I. J. and Mittal, Y. (1987). The amalgamation and geometry of two-by-two contingency tables, Annals of Statistics 15, 694-711. Addendum 17, 947 (1989).
22. Greenacre, M. and Hastie, T. (1987). The geometric interpretation of correspondence analysis, Journal of the American Statistical Association 82, 437-47.
23. Hadjicostas, P. (1998). The asymptotic proportion of subdivisions of a 2 x 2 table that result in Simpson’s paradox, Combinatorics, Probability and Computing 7, 387-96.
24. Heiser, W. J. (2004). Geometric representation of association between categories, Psy- chometrika 69, 513-45.
25. Kadane, J. B., Meyer, M. M. and Tukey, J. W. (1999). Yule’s association paradox and ignored stratum heterogeneity in capture-recapture studies, Journal of the American Statistical Association 94, 855-9.
26. Kagan, A. M., Linnik, Y. V. and Rao, C. R. (1973). Characterization Problems in Mathematical Statistics (New York, John Wiley & Sons).
27. Kenett, R. S. (1983). On an exploratory analysis of contingency tables, The Statistician 32, 395-403.
28. Lauritzen, S. L. (1996). Graphical Models (New York, Oxford University Press).
29. Luo, D., Wood, G. and Jones, G. (2004). Visualising contingency table data, Australian Mathematical Society Gazette 31, 258-62.
30. Nelsen, R. B. (2006). An Introduction to Copulas 2nd edn (New York, Springer-Verlag).
31. Nelsen, R. B. (1995). Copulas, characterization, correlation, and counterexamples, Mathematics Magazine 68, 193-8.
32. Pearson, E. S. (1956). Some aspects of the geometry of statistics, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A 119, 125-46.
33. Pistone, G., Riccomagno, E. and Wynn, H. P. (2001). Algebraic Statistics (Boca Raton, Chapman & Hall/CRC).
34. Ramachandran, B. and Lau, K. S. (1991). Functional Equations in Probability Theory (New York, Academic Press).
35. Shapiro, S. H. (1982). Collapsing contingency tables - A geometric approach, American Statistician 36, 43-6.
36. Simpson, E. H. (1951). The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B 13, 238-41.
37. Slavkovic, A. B. (2004). Statistical disclosure limitation beyond the margins: characterization of joint distributions for contingency tables. PhD thesis, Department of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon University.
38. Slavkovic, A. B. and Sullivant, S. (2004). The space of compatible full conditionals is a unimodular toric variety, Journal of Symbolic Computing 46, 196-209.
39. Yule, G. U. (1903). Notes on the theory of association of attributes in statistics, Biometrika 2, 121-34.