Comparing latent structures of the Grade of Membership, rasch, and latent class models

Psychometrika

Volumn 70, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 619-628

  Erosheva, Elena A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

2 2 contingency table; Fuzzy sets model; Geometric approach; Heterogeneity; Local independence

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646422748     PISSN: 00333123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11336-001-0899-y     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Fienberg, S.E., & Gilbert, J.P. (1970). The geometry of a two by two contingency table. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65, 694-701.
2. Haberman, S.J. (1995). Book review of "Statistical applications using fuzzy sets," by K.G. Manton, M.A. Woodbury, & L.S. Corder. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 1131-1133.
3. Hubert, D., & Cohn-Vossen, S. (1952). Geometry and the imagination. New York: Chelsea.
4. Holland, P.W. (1990). On the sampling theory foundations of item response theory models. Psychometrika, 55(4), 577-601.
5. Holland, P.W., & Rosenbaum, P.R. (1986). Conditional association and unidimensionality in monotone latent variable models. Annals of Statistics, 14, 1523-1543.
6. Lazarsfeld, P.F., & Henry, N.W. (1968). Latent structure analysis. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
7. Manton, K.G., Woodbury, M.A., & Tolley, H.D. (1994). Statistical applications using fuzzy sets. New York: Wiley.
8. Potthoff, R.F., Manton, K.G., & Woodbury, M.A. (2000). Dirichlet generalizations of latent-class models. Journal of Classification. 17(2), 315-353.
9. Prochaska, J.O., DiClemente, C.C., & Norcross, J.C. (1992). In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. Americal Psychologist, 47, 1102-1114.
10. Ramsay, J.O. (1996). A geometrical approach to item response theory. Behaviormetrika, 23, 3-17.
11. Woodbury, M.A., Manton, K.G., & Tolley, H.D. (1997). Convex models of high dimensional discrete data. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics. 49, 371-393.