Graphical representations and odds ratios in a distance-association model for the analysis of cross-classified data

Psychometrika

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 99-122

  De Rooij, Mark ^a   Heiser, Willem J ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Euclidean distances; Log linear modelling; Maximum likelihood estimation; Multidimensional scaling; Multidimensional unfolding

Indexed keywords

EID: 14944364410     PISSN: 00333123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11336-000-0848-1     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Andersen, E. B. (1980). Discrete statistical models with social science applications. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
2. Becker, M. P. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation of the RC(M) association model. Applied statistics, 39, 152-167.
3. Becker, M. P., & Clogg, C. C. (1989). Analysis of sets of two-way contingency tables using association models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 142-151.
4. Borg, I., & Groenen, P. (1997). Modern multidimensional scaling; theory and applications. New York: Springer.
5. Bradley, R. A., & Terry, M. E. (1952). Rank analysis of incomplete designs I. the method of paired comparisons. Biometrika, 39, 324-345.
6. Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1984). Classification and regression trees. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
7. Carroll, J. D., Green, P. E., & Schaffer, C. M. (1986). Interpoint distance comparison in correspondence analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 271-280.
8. Carroll, J. D., Green, P. E., & Schaffer, C. M. (1987). Comparing interpoint distance in correspondence analysis: A clarification. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 445-450.
9. Carroll, J. D., Green, P. E., & Schaffer, C. M. (1989). Reply to Greenacre's commentary on the Carroll-Green-Schaffer scaling of two-way correspondence analysis solutions. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 366-368.
10. Caussinus, H. (1965). Contribution á l'analyse statistique des tableaux de corrélation [contributions to the statistical analysis of correlation matrices]. Annals of the faculty of Science, University of Toulouse, 29, 715-720.
11. Clogg, C. C., Eliason, S. R., & Wahl, R. J. (1990). Labor-market experiences and labor force outcomes. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1536-1576.
12. Coombs, C. H. (1964). A theory of data. New York: Wiley.
13. De Leeuw, J., & Heiser, W. J. (1977). Convergence of correction-matrix algorithms for multidimensional scaling. In J. C. Lingoes, E. E. Roskam, & I. Borg (Eds.), Geometric representations of relational data (pp. 735-752). Ann Arbor, MI: Mathesis Press.
14. De Rooij, M. (2001). Distance models for the analysis of transition frequencies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Leiden University.
15. De Rooij, M., & Heiser, W. J. (2002). A distance representation of the quasi-symmetry model and related distance models. In H. Yanai, A. Okada, K. Shigemasu, Y. Kano, & J. J. Meulman (Eds.), New developments on psychometrics: proceedings of the international meeting of the psychometric society (pp. 487-494). Tokyo: Springer-Verlag.
16. Defays, D. (1978). A short note on a method of seriation. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 3, 49-53.
17. Fienberg, S. E., & Larntz, K. (1976). Loglinear representation of paired and multiple comparison models. Biometrika, 63, 245-254.
18. Gifi, A. (1990). Nonlinear multivariate analysis. New York: Wiley.
19. Gilula, Z., & Haberman, S. J. (1986). Canonical analysis of contingency tables by maximum likelihood. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 780-788.
20. Goodman, L. A. (1971). The analysis of multidimensional contingency tables: stepwise procedures and direct estimation methods for building models for multiple classifications. Technometrics, 13, 33-61.
21. Goodman, L. A. (1972). Some multiplicative models for the analysis of cross-classified data. Sixth Berkely Symposium, 1, 649-696.
22. Goodman, L. A. (1979). Simple models for the analysis of association in cross classifications having ordered categories. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 537-552.
23. Goodman, L. A. (1981). Association models and cannonical correlation in the analysis of cross-classifications having ordered categories. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 320-334.
24. Goodman, L. A. (1985). The analysis of cross-classified data having ordered and/or unordered categories: Association models, correlation models, and asymmetric models for contingency tables with or without missing entries. The Annals of Statistics, 13, 10-69.
25. Goodman, L. A. (1986). Some useful extensions to the usual correspondence analysis approach and the usual log-linear models approach in the analysis of contingency tables. International Statistical Review, 54, 243-309.
26. Greenacre, M. J. (1984). Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. London: Academic Press.
27. Greenacre, M. J. (1989). The Carroll-Green-Schaffer scaling in correspondence analysis: A theoretical and expirical appraisal. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 358-365.
28. Groenen, P. J. F., De Leeuw, J., & Mathar, R. (1996). Least squares multidimensional scaling with transformed distances. In W. Gaul & D. Pfeifer (Eds.), Studies in classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization (pp. 177-185). Berlin: Springer.
29. Haberman, S. J. (1974). The analysis of frequency data. Chicago: university of Chicago Press.
30. Haberman, S. J. (1978). Analysis of qualitative data, (vol. 1). New York: Academic Press.
31. Haberman, S. J. (1979). Analysis of qualitative data (vol. 2). New York: Academic Press.
32. Haberman, S. J. (1995). Computation of maximum likelihood estimates in association models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 1438-1446.
33. Heiser, W. J. (1981). Unfolding analysis of proximity data. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Leiden University.
34. Heiser, W. J. (1987). Joint ordination of species and sites: The unfolding technique. In P. Legendre & L. Legendre (Eds.), Developments in numerical ecology (pp. 189-221). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
35. Heiser, W. J. (1988). Selecting a stimulus set with prescribed structure from empirical confusion frequencies. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 41, 37-51.
36. Heiser, W. J., & Meulman, J. (1983). Analyzing rectangular tables by joint and constrained multidimensional scaling. Journal of Econometrics, 22, 139-167.
37. Hubert, L. J., & Arabie, P. (1986). Unidimensional scaling and combinatorial optimization. In J. De Leeuw, W. J. Heiser, J. Meulman, & F. Critchley (Eds.), Multidimensional data analysis (pp. 181-196). Leiden: DSWO press.
38. Ihm, P., & Van Groenewoud, H. (1975). A multivariate ordering of vegetation data based on Gaussian type gradient response curves. Journal of Ecology, 63, 767-778.
39. Ihm, P., & Van Groenewoud, H. (1984). Correspondence analysis and Gaussian ordination. COMPSTAT Lectures, 3, 5-60.
40. Meulman, J. J., & Heiser, W. J. (1998). Visual display of interaction in multiway contingency tables by use of homogeneity analysis: the 2×2×2×2 case. In J. Blasius & M. J. Greenacre (Eds.), Visualization of categorical data (pp. 277-296). New York: Academic Press.
41. Meulman, J. J., Heiser, W. J., & SPSS Inc. (1999). Spss Categories 10.0. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.
42. Nishisato, S. (1980). Analysis of categorical data: Dual scaling and its applications. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
43. Nosofsky, R. M. (1985). Overall similarity and the identification of separable-dimension stimuli: A choice model analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 415-432.
44. Shepard, R. N. (1957). Stimulus and response generalization: A stochastic model relating generalization to distance in psychological space. Psychometrika, 22, 325-345.
45. Srole, L., Langner, T. S., Michael, S. T., Opler, M. K., & Rennie, T. A. C. (1962). Mental health in the metropolis: The midtown Manhattan study. New York: McGraw-Hill.
46. Takane, Y. (1987). Analysis of contingency tables by ideal point discriminant analysis. Psychometrika, 52, 493-513.
47. Takane, Y. (1998). Visualization in ideal point discriminant analysis. In J. Blasius & M. J. Greenacre (Eds.), Visualization of categorical data (pp. 441-459). New York: Academic Press.
48. Takane, Y., & Shibayama, T. (1986). Comparison of models for the stimulus recognition data. In J. De Leeuw, W. J. Heiser, J. Meulman, & F. Critchley (Eds.), Multidimensional data analysis (pp. 119-138). Leiden: DSWO Press.
49. Takane, Y., & Shibayama, T. (1992). Structures in stimulus identification data. In F. G. Ashby (Ed.), Probabilistic multidimensional models of perception and cognition (pp. 335-362). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Ter Braak, C. J. F. (1985). Correspondence analysis of incidence and abundance data: properties in terms of a unimodal response model. Biometrics, 41, 859-873.
51. Van der Heijden, P. G. M. (1987). Correspondence analysis of longitudonal categorical data. Leiden: DSWO.
52. Van der Heijden, P. G. M., Mooijaart, A., & Takane, Y. (1994). Correspondence analysis and contingency models. In M. J. Greenacre & J. Blasius (Eds.), Correspondence analysis in the social sciences (pp. 79-111). New York: Academic Press.
53. Wiepkema, P. R. (1961). An ethological analysis of the reproductive behavior of the bitterling (rhodeus amarus bloch). Archives Neerlandais Zoologique, 14, 103-199.
54. Winsberg, S., & Carroll, J. D. (1989). A quasi-nonmetric method for multidimensional scaling via an extended Euclidean model. Psychometrika, 54, 217-229.