Measuring relative timings of brain activities using fMRI

NeuroImage

Volumn 66, Issue , 2013, Pages 436-448

  Katwal, Santosh B ^a,b   Gore, John C ^a,b,c   Gatenby, J Christopher ^d   Rogers, Baxter P ^a,b,c  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Granger causality; Inverse logit functions; Mental chronometry; Self organizing map; SOM visualization; Stimulus onset asynchrony; Ultrahigh field fMRI

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BOLD SIGNAL; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; OPTICAL RESOLUTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS CONTROL; RESPONSE TIME; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIGNAL DETECTION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION; VOXEL BASED MORPHOMETRY; ALGORITHM; BRAIN; IMAGE PROCESSING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

ALGORITHMS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHOTIC STIMULATION;

EID: 84870209859     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.052     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Abler B., Roebroeck A., Goebel R., Höse A., Schönfeldt-Lecuona C., Hole G., Walter H. Investigating directed influences between activated brain areas in a motor response task using fMRI. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2006, 24:181-185.
2. Aguirre G.K., Zarahn E., D'esposito M. The variability of human, BOLD hemodynamic responses. NeuroImage 1998, 8:360-369.
3. Brett M., Anton J.L., Valabregue R., Poline J.-B. Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain, Sendai, Japan 2002.
4. Calhoun V.D., Liu J., Adali T. A review of group ICA for fMRI data and ICA for joint inference of imaging, genetic, and ERP data. NeuroImage 2009, 45:S163-S172.
5. Deshpande G., Sathian K., Hu X. Effect of hemodynamic variability on Granger causality analysis of fMRI. NeuroImage 2010, 52:884-896.
6. Efron B., Tishbirani R.J. An introduction to the bootstrap 1993, Chapman and Hall, New York.
7. Formisano E., Goebel R. Tracking cognitive processes with functional MRI mental chronometry. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2003, 13:174-181.
8. Geweke J. Measures of conditional linear dependence and feedback between time series. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1982, 77:304-313.
9. Goebel R., Roebroeck A., Kim D., Fomisano E. Investigating directed cortical interactions in time-resolved fMRI data using vector autoregressive modeling and Granger causality mapping. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2003, 21:1251-1261.
10. Goutte C., Toft P., Rostrup E., Nielsen F.A., Hansen L.K. On clustering fMRI time series. NeuroImage 1999, 9:298-310.
11. Granger C.W.J. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 1969, 37:424-438.
12. Handwerker D.A., Ollinger J.M., D'Esposito M. Variation of BOLD hemodynamic responses across subjects and brain regions and their effects on statistical analyses. NeuroImage 2004, 21:1639-1651.
13. Henson R.N.A., Price C.J., Rugg M.D., Turner R., Friston K.J. Detecting latency differences in event-related BOLD responses: application to words versus nonwords and initial versus repeated face presentations. NeuroImage 2002, 15:83-97.
14. Hernandez L., Badre D., Noll D., Jonides J. Temporal sensitivity of event-related fMRI. NeuroImage 2002, 17:1018-1026.
15. Katwal S.B., Gatenby J.C., Gore J.C., Rogers B.P. Minimum resolvable latency difference of BOLD responses at 7T using autoregressive modeling. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting 2009, 3677. International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Hawaii, USA.
16. Katwal S.B., Gore J.C., Rogers B.P. Analyzing fMRI data with graph-based visualizations of self-organizing maps. 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, Chicago, USA 2011, 1577-1580.
17. Kohonen T. The Self-organizing map. Proc. IEEE 1990, 78:1464-1480.
18. Kohonen T. Self-organizing maps. Series in Information Sciences 2001, 30. Springer-Heidelberg, New York.
19. Liao C.H., Worsley K.J., Poline J.-B., Aston J.A.D., Duncan G.H., Evans A.C. Estimating the delay of the fMRI response. NeuroImage 2002, 16:593-606.
20. Liao W., Chen H., Yang Q., Lei X. Analysis of fMRI data using improved self-organizing mapping and spatio-temporal metric hierarchical clustering. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2008, 27:1472-1483.
21. Lin F.-H., Polimeni J.R., Tsai K.W.-K., Witzel T., Chang W.-T., Kuo W.-J., Belliveau J.W. The limit of relative timing accuracy of BOLD fMRI in human visual cortex. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meeting 2011, 3582. International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
22. Lindquist M.A., Loh J.M., Atlas L.Y., Wager T.D. Modeling the hemodynamic response function in fMRI: efficiency, bias and mis-modeling. NeuroImage 2009, 45:S187-S198.
23. McKeown M.J., Makeig S., Brown G.G., Jung T.P., Kindermann S.S., Bell A.J., Sejnowski T.J. Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1998, 6:160-188.
24. Menon R.S. Mental chronometry. NeuroImage 2012, 62:1068-1071.
25. Menon R.S., Kim S.-G. Spatial and temporal limits in cognitive neuroimaging with fMRI. Trends Cogn. Sci. 1999, 3:207-216.
26. Menon R.S., Luknowsky D.K., Gati J.S. Mental chronometry using latency-resolved functional MR. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1998, 95:10902-10907.
27. Meyer-Bäse A., Wismüller A., Lange O. Comparison of two exploratory data analysis method for fMRI: unsupervised clustering versus independent component analysis. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 2004, 8:387-398.
28. Miezin F.M., Maccotta L., Ollinger J.M., Petersen S.E., Buckner R.L. Characterizing the hemodynamic response: effects of presentation rate, sampling procedure, and the possibility of ordering brain activity based on relative timing. NeuroImage 2000, 11:735-759.
29. Peltier S.J., Polk T.A., Noll D.C. Detecting low-frequency functional connectivity in fMRI using a self-organizing map (SOM) algorithm. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2003, 20:220-226.
30. Raj, V., 2001. Studies of physical limitations in functional magnetic resonance imaging. Ph.D. Dissertation, Yale University, United States. (Publication No. AAT 3007413).
31. Roebroeck A., Formisano E., Goebel R. Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI. NeuroImage 2005, 25:230-242.
32. Rogers B.P., Katwal S.B., Morgan V.L., Asplund C.L., Gore J.C. Functional MRI and multivariate autoregressive models. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010, 28:1058-1065.
33. Schippers M.B., Remco R., Keysers C. The effect of intra- and inter-subject variability of hemodynamic response on group level Granger causality analyses. NeuroImage 2011, 57:22-36.
34. Sigman M., Jobert A., Lebihan D., Dehaene S. Parsing a sequence of brain activations at psychological times using fMRI. NeuroImage 2007, 35:665-668.
35. Smith S.M., Miller K.L., Salimi-Khorshidi G., Webster M., Beckmann C.F., Nichols T.E., Ramsey J.D., Woolrich M.W. Network modelling methods for FMRI. NeuroImage 2011, 54:875-891.
36. Tasdemir K. Graph based representations of density distribution and distances for self-organizing maps. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 2010, 21:520-526.