Quantitative fluorescence PCR analysis of >40000 prenatal samples for the rapid diagnosis of trisomies 13, 18 and 21 and monosomy X

Prenatal Diagnosis

Volumn 32, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 1197-1204

  Mann, Kathy ^a   Hills, Alison ^a   Donaghue, Celia ^a   Thomas, Helen ^a   Ogilvie, Caroline Mackie ^b  

^a GUY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b GUY'S AND ST THOMAS' NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMNION FLUID ANALYSIS; ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; CHORION VILLUS; CONTAMINATION; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; FETUS; FETUS KARYOTYPING; GENOTYPE; HETEROZYGOSITY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MICROSATELLITE MARKER; MONOSOMY X; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE FLUORESCENCE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEX CHROMOSOME; TRISOMY 13; TRISOMY 18; TRISOMY 21;

CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, PAIR 13; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, PAIR 18; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, PAIR 21; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, X; FEMALE; FLUORESCENCE; HUMANS; MONOSOMY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEX CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; TIME FACTORS; TRISOMY;

EID: 84870064187     PISSN: 01973851     EISSN: 10970223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pd.3986     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Tepperberg J, Pettenati MJ, Rao PN, et al. Prenatal diagnosis using interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): 2-year multi-center retrospective study and review of the literature. Prenat Diagn 2001;21(4):293-301.
2. Mann K. Prenatal detection of chromosome aneuploidy by quantitative fluorescence-PCR. Methods Mol Med 2004;92:141-56.
3. Mann K, Fox SP, Abbs SJ, et al. Development and implementation of a new rapid aneuploidy diagnostic service within the UK National Health Service and implications for the future of prenatal diagnosis. Lancet 2001;358(9287):1057-61.
4. Hills A, Donaghue C, Waters J, et al. QF-PCR as a stand-alone test for prenatal samples: the first 2 years' experience in the London region. Prenat Diagn 2010;30(6):509-17.
5. Gekas J, van den Berg DG, Durand A, et al. Rapid testing versus karyotyping in Down's syndrome screening: cost-effectiveness and detection of clinically significant chromosome abnormalities. Eur J Hum Genet 2010;19(1):3-9.
6. Putzova M, Soldatova I, Pecnova L, et al. QF-PCR-based prenatal detection of common aneuploidies in the Czech population: five years of experience. Eur J Med Genet 2008;51(3):209-18.
7. Cirigliano V, Voglino G, Ordonez E, et al. Rapid prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome aneuploidies by QF-PCR, results of 9 years of clinical experience. Prenat Diagn 2009;29(1):40-9.
8. Lau ET, Tang L, Wong C, et al. Assessing discrepant findings between QF-PCR on uncultured prenatal samples and karyotyping on long-term culture. Prenat Diagn 2009;29(2):151-5.
9. Baig S, Ho SS, Ng BL, et al. Development of quantitative-fluorescence polymerase chain reaction for the rapid prenatal diagnosis of common chromosomal aneuploidies in 1, 000 samples in Singapore. Singapore Med J 2010;51(4):343-8.
10. Sullivan KM, Mannucci A, Kimpton CP, et al. A rapid and quantitative DNA sex test: fluorescence-based PCR analysis of X-Y homologous gene amelogenin. Biotechniques 1993;15(4):636-8, 40-1.
11. Donaghue C, Roberts A, Mann K, et al. Development and targeted application of a rapid QF-PCR test for sex chromosome imbalance. Prenat Diagn 2003;23(3):201-10.
12. Deutsch S, Choudhury U, Merla G, et al. Detection of aneuploidies by paralogous sequence quantification. J Med Genet 2004;41(12):908-15.
13. Stojilkovic-Mikic T, Mann K, Docherty Z, et al. Maternal cell contamination of prenatal samples assessed by QF-PCR genotyping. Prenat Diagn 2005;25(1):79-83.
14. Donaghue C, Mann K, Docherty Z, et al. Detection of mosaicism for primary trisomies in prenatal samples by QF-PCR and karyotype analysis. Prenat Diagn 2005;25(1):65-72.
15. Mann K, Kabba M, Donaghue C, et al. Analysis of a chromosomally mosaic placenta to assess the cell populations in dissociated chorionic villi: implications for QF-PCR aneuploidy testing. Prenat Diagn 2007;27(3):287-9.
16. Waters JJ, Mann K, Grimsley L, et al. Complete discrepancy between QF-PCR analysis of uncultured villi and karyotyping of cultured cells in the prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21 in three CVS. Prenat Diagn 2007;27(4):332-9.
17. Mann K, Donaghue C, Ogilvie CM. In vivo somatic microsatellite mutations identified in non-malignant human tissue. Hum Genet 2003;114(1):110-4.
18. Mann K, Donaghue C, Fox SP, et al. Strategies for the rapid prenatal diagnosis of chromosome aneuploidy. Eur J Hum Genet 2004;12(11):907-15.
19. Ogilvie CM, Donaghue C, Fox SP, et al. Rapid prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidy using quantitative fluorescence-PCR (QF-PCR). J Histochem Cytochem 2005;53(3):285-8.
20. Robinson WP, Lauzon JL, Innes AM, et al. Origin and outcome of pregnancies affected by androgenetic/biparental chimerism. Hum Reprod 2007;22(4):1114-22.
21. Donaghue C, Zheng Q, Hills A, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of androgenetic/parthenogenetic chimeras J Med Genet 2011;48(S1):S85.
22. Hochstenbach R, Meijer J, van de Brug J, et al. Rapid detection of chromosomal aneuploidies in uncultured amniocytes by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). Prenat Diagn 2005;25(11):1032-9.
23. Gerdes T, Kirchhoff M, Lind AM, et al. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) in prenatal diagnosis-experience of a large series of rapid testing for aneuploidy of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y. Prenat Diagn 2008;28(12):1119-25.
24. Vialard F, Simoni G, Aboura A, et al. Prenatal BACs-on-Beads: a new technology for rapid detection of aneuploidies and microdeletions in prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 2011;31(5):500-8.
25. Konialis C, Hagnefelt B, Sevastidou S, et al. Uncovering recurrent microdeletion syndromes and subtelomeric deletions/duplications through non-selective application of a MLPA-based extended prenatal panel in routine prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 2011;31(6):571-7.
26. Vialard F, Simoni G, Gomes DM, et al. Prenatal BACs-on-Beads(TM): the prospective experience of five prenatal diagnosis laboratories. Prenat Diagn 2012;32(4):329-35.
27. Kooper AJ, Faas BH, Kater-Baats E, et al. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) as a stand-alone test for rapid aneuploidy detection in amniotic fluid cells. Prenat Diagn 2008;28(11):1004-10.
28. Shaffer LG, Dabell MP, Rosenfeld JA, et al. Referral patterns for microarray testing in prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 2012;32(4):344-50.
29. Vetro A, Bouman K, Hastings R, et al. The introduction of arrays in prenatal diagnosis: A special challenge. Hum Mutat 2012;33(6):923-9.
30. Lee CN, Lin SY, Lin CH, et al. Clinical utility of array comparative genomic hybridisation for prenatal diagnosis: a cohort study of 3171 pregnancies. BJOG 2012;119(5):614-25.
31. Faas BH, de Ligt J, Janssen I, et al. Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies using massively parallel sequencing-by-ligation and evidence that cell-free fetal DNA in the maternal plasma originates from cytotrophoblastic cells. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2012;12(Suppl 1):S19-26.
32. Palomaki GE, Kloza EM, Lambert-Messerlian GM, et al. DNA sequencing of maternal plasma to detect Down syndrome: an international clinical validation study. Genet Med 2011;13(11):913-20.