Prenatal BACs-on-Beads™: A new technology for rapid detection of aneuploidies and microdeletions in prenatal diagnosis

Prenatal Diagnosis

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 500-508

  Vialard, F ^a,b,k   Simoni, G ^c   Aboura, A ^d   De Toffol, S ^c   Molina Gomes, D ^a,b   Marcato, L ^c   Serero, S ^e   Clement, P ^f   Bouhanna, P ^a   Rouleau, E ^g   Grimi, B ^c   Selva, J ^a,b   Gaetani, E ^c   Maggi, F ^c   Joseph, A ^h   Benzacken, B ^d,i,j   Grati, F R ^c  

^a CENTRE HOSPITALIER INTERCOMMUNAL   (France)

^b INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

^c TOMA Advanced Biomedical Assays SpA   (Italy)

^d HÔPITAL ROBERT DEBRÉ   (France)

^e Centre de Biologie et de Cytogénétique   (France)

^f Laboratoire Clement   (France)

^g CENTRE RENÉ HUGUENIN   (France)

^h PerkinElmer ^*  (Finland)

ⁱ HÔPITAL JEAN VERDIER   (France)

^j UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 13   (France)

^k Laboratorio TOMA   (Italy)

more..

Author keywords

BACs on Beads ; Microdeletions; Prenatal diagnosis; Screening

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL ARTIFICIAL CHROMOSOME; CHROMOSOME 13; CHROMOSOME 18; CHROMOSOME 21; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CHROMOSOME DELETION; CHROMOSOME MOSAICISM; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; CYTOGENETICS; FEMALE; FETUS KARYOTYPING; GENE TECHNOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICRODELETION SYNDROME; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYNDROME; VALIDATION STUDY; X CHROMOSOME; Y CHROMOSOME;

ADULT; ANEUPLOIDY; CHORIONIC VILLI SAMPLING; CHROMOSOMES, ARTIFICIAL, BACTERIAL; CORDOCENTESIS; DNA; FEMALE; FETAL BLOOD; GENE DELETION; GENETIC DISEASES, INBORN; HUMANS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; MALE; MOSAICISM; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

EID: 79954741750     PISSN: 01973851     EISSN: 10970223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pd.2727     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. ABM. 2009
2. ACOG. 2007. ACOG practice bulletin no. 88, December 2007. Invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy. Obstet Gynecol 110: 1459-1467.
3. ACOG. 2009. ACOG committee opinion no. 446: array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol 114: 1161-1163.
4. Bendavid C, Dubourg C, Gicquel I, et al. 2006. Molecular evaluation of foetuses with holoprosencephaly shows high incidence of microdeletions in the HPE genes. Hum Genet 119: 1-8.
5. Bruno DL, Anderlid BM, Lindstrand A, et al. 2010. Further molecular and clinical delineation of co-locating 17p13.3 microdeletions and microduplications that show distinctive phenotypes. J Med Genet 47: 299-311.
6. Cirigliano V, Ejarque M, Canadas MP, et al. 2001. Clinical application of multiplex quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) for the rapid prenatal detection of common chromosome aneuploidies. Mol Hum Reprod 7: 1001-1006.
7. Driscoll D. 2001. Prenatal diagnosis of the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Genet Med 3: 14-18.
8. Dunbar SA. 2006. Applications of LuminexR xMAPi technology for rapid, high-throughput multiplexed nucleic acid detection. Clin Chim Acta 363: 71-82.
9. Friedman JM. 2009. High-resolution array genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 29: 20-28.
10. Grati FR, Barlocco A, Grimi B, et al. 2010. Chromosome abnormalities investigated by non-invasive prenatal testing account for approximately 50% of fetal unbalances associated with relevant clinical phenotypes. Am J Med Genet A 152: 1434-1442.
11. Grati FR, Grimi B, Frascoli G, et al. 2006. Confirmation of mosaicism and uniparental disomy in amniocytes, after detection of mosaic chromosome abnormalities in chorionic villi. Eur J Hum Genet 14: 282-288.
12. Gross SJ, Bajaj K, Garry D, et al. 2011. Rapid and novel prenatal molecular assay for detecting aneuploidies and microdeletion syndromes. Prenat Diagn 31: 259-266.
13. Hahnemann JM, Vejerslev LO. 1997. Accuracy of cytogenetic findings on chorionic villus sampling (CVS)-diagnostic consequences of CVS mosaicism and non-mosaic discrepancy in centres contributing to EUCROMIC 1986-1992. Prenat Diagn 17: 801-820.
14. Hannes F, Drozniewska M, Vermeesch JR, Haus O. 2010. Duplication of the Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome critical region causes neurodevelopmental delay. Eur J Med Genet 53: 136-140.
15. Hills A, Donaghue C, Waters J, et al. 2010. QF-PCR as a stand-alone test for prenatal samples: the first 2 years' experience in the London region. Prenat Diagn 30: 509-517.
16. Kleeman L, Bianchi DW, Shaffer LG, et al. 2009. Use of array comparative genomic hybridization for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with sonographic anomalies and normal metaphase karyotype. Prenat Diagn 29: 1213-1217.
17. Le Caignec C, Boceno M, Saugier-Veber P, et al. 2005. Detection of genomic imbalances by array based comparative genomic hybridisation in fetuses with multiple malformations. J Med Genet 42: 121-128.
18. Loscalzo ML, Becker TA, Sutcliffe M. 2008. A patient with an interstitial duplication of chromosome 5p11-p13.3 further confirming a critical region for 5p duplication syndrome. Eur J Med Genet 51: 54-60.
19. Manji S, Roberson JR, Wiktor A, et al. 2001. Prenatal diagnosis of 22q11.2 deletion when ultrasound examination reveals a heart defect. Genet Med 3: 65-66.
20. Mann K, Fox SP, Abbs SJ, et al. 2001. Development and implementation of a new rapid aneuploidy diagnostic service within the UK National Health Service and implications for the future of prenatal diagnosis. Lancet 358: 1057-1061.
21. Mann K, Kabba M, Donaghue C, Hills A, Ogilvie CM. 2007. Analysis of a chromosomally mosaic placenta to assess the cell populations in dissociated chorionic villi: implications for QF-PCR aneuploidy testing. Prenat Diagn 27: 287-289.
22. Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S, et al. 2010. Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. Am J Hum Genet 86: 749-764.
23. Neill NJ, Torchia BS, Bejjani BA, Shaffer LG, Ballif BC. 2010. Comparative analysis of copy number detection by whole-genome BAC and oligonucleotide array CGH. Mol Cytogenet 3: 11.
24. Pergament E. 2007. Controversies and challenges of array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal genetic diagnosis. Genet Med 9: 596-599.
25. Pertl B, Kopp S, Kroisel PM, Tului L, Brambati B, Adinolfi M. 1999. Rapid detection of chromosome aneuploidies by quantitative fluorescence PCR: first application on 247 chorionic villus samples. J Med Genet 36: 300-303.
26. Portnoï MF. 2009. Microduplication 22q11.2: a new chromosomal syndrome. Eur J Med Genet 52: 88-93.
27. Robberecht C, Schuddinck V, Fryns JP, Vermeesch JR. 2009. Diagnosis of miscarriages by molecular karyotyping: benefits and pitfalls. Genet Med 11: 646-654.
28. Romana SP, Tachdjian G, Druart L, Cohen D, Berger R, Chérif D. 1993. A simple method for prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21 on uncultured amniocytes. Eur J Hum Genet 1: 245-251.
29. Treadwell-Deering DE, Powell MP, Potocki L. 2010. Cognitive and behavioral characterization of the Potocki-Lupski syndrome (duplication 17p11.2). J Dev Behav Pediatr 31: 137-143.
30. Van der Aa N, Rooms L, Vandeweyer G, et al. 2009. Fourteen new cases contribute to the characterization of the 7q11.23 microduplication syndrome. Eur J Med Genet 52: 94-100.
31. Van den Veyver IB, Patel A, Shaw CA, et al. 2009. Clinical use of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) for prenatal diagnosis in 300 cases. Prenat Diagn 29: 29-39.
32. Vermeesch JR, Fiegler H, de Leeuw N, et al. 2007. Guidelines for molecular karyotyping in constitutional genetic diagnosis. Eur J Hum Genet 15: 1105-1114.
33. Vialard F, Molina Gomes D, Leroy B, et al. 2009. Array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis: another experience. Fetal Diagn Ther 25: 277-284.
34. Wolstenholme J, Evans J, English C. 2008. A 45, X fetus with false-negative 46, XX findings in CVS. Prenat Diagn 28: 266-267.
35. van der Zwaag B, Staal WG, Hochstenbach R, et al. 2010. A co-segregating microduplication of chromosome 15q11.2 pinpoints two risk genes for autism spectrum disorder. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 153: 960-966.