An interactive system for computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses

Journal of Digital Imaging

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 570-579

  Wang, Xingwei ^a   Li, Lihua ^b   Liu, Wei ^b   Xu, Weidong ^b   Lederman, Dror ^a   Zheng, Bin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b HANGZHOU DIANZI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Computer aided detection and diagnosis (CAD); Content based image retrieval (CBIR); Mammograms

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; BREAST MASS; CAD SYSTEM; CLASSIFICATION PERFORMANCE; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION AND DIAGNOSIS; CONTENT-BASED IMAGE RETRIEVAL; DECISION ALGORITHMS; GENERAL POPULATION; IMAGE FEATURES; IMAGING MODALITY; INTERACTIVE SYSTEM; LEAVE-ONE-OUT; MALIGNANT MASS; MAMMOGRAMS; MASS REGIONS; MULTI-DIMENSIONAL SPACE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES; REFERENCE DATABASE; REFERENCE IMAGE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TESTING METHOD;

ALGORITHMS; COMMUNICATION; CONTENT BASED RETRIEVAL; DISEASES; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL IMAGING; QUERY PROCESSING; SEARCH ENGINES; X RAY SCREENS;

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; BREAST TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; EVALUATION; FACTUAL DATABASE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INSTRUMENTATION; MAMMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UNITED STATES; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84870064143     PISSN: 08971889     EISSN: 1618727X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-012-9451-0     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E: Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer 60:277-300, 2010
2. Cady B, Michaelson JS: The life-sparing potential of mammographic screening. Cancer 91:1699-1703, 2001
3. Leach MO, Boggis CR, Dixon AK, et al: Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familiar risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancer 365:1769-1778, 2005
4. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al: American cancer society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 57:168-185, 2007
5. Amir E, Freedman OC, Seruga B, Evans DG: Assessing women at high risk of breast cancer: a review of risk assessment models. J Natl Cancer Inst 102:680-691, 2010
6. Sickles EA, Wolverton DE, Dee KE: Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists. Radiology 224:861-869, 2002
7. Buist DS, Anderson ML, Haneuse SJ, et al: Influence of annual interpretive volume on screening mammography performance in the United States. Radiology 259:72-84, 2011
8. Fenton JJ, Wheeler J, Carney PA, et al: Reality check: perceived versus actual performance of community mammographers. Am J Rotentgenol 187:42-46, 2006
9. Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA, et al: Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 292:1317-1325, 2004
10. Hubbard RA, Kerlikowske K, Flowers CI, et al: Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 155:481-492, 2011
11. Burrell HC, Pinder SE, Wilson AR, et al: The positive predictive value of mammographic signs: a review of 425 non-palpable breast lesions. Clin Radiol 51:277-281, 1996
12. Nishikawa RM: Current status and future directions of computeraided diagnosis in mammography. Comput Med Imaging Graph 31:224-235, 2007
13. Freer TM, Ulissey MJ: Screening mammography with computeraided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 220:781-786, 2001
14. Brem RF, Baum J, Lechner M, et al: Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial. Am J Roentgenol 181:687-693, 2003
15. Gur D, Sumkin JH, Rockette HE, et al: Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:185-190, 2004
16. Fenton JJ, Abraham L, Taplin SH, et al: Effectiveness of computeraided detection in community mammography practice. J Natl Cancer Inst 103:1152-1161, 2011
17. Zheng B, Chough D, Ronald P, et al: Actual versus intended use of CAD systems in the clinical environment. Proc SPIE 6146:9-14, 2006
18. Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, O'Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA: Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computeraided detection. Radiology 219:192-202, 2001
19. Khoo LA, Taylor P, Given-Wilson RM: Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Programme: prospective study. Radiology 237:444-449, 2005
20. Ko JM, Nicholas MJ, Mendel JB, Slanetz PJ: Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammograms. Am J Roentgenol 187:1483-1491, 2006
21. Alberdi E, Povyakalo A, Strigini L, Ayton P: Effect of incorrect computer-aided detection (CAD) output on human decisionmaking in mammography. Acad Radiol 11:909-918, 2004
22. Giger ML, Huo Z, Vyborny CJ, et al: Intelligent CAD workstation for breast imaging using similarity to known lesions and multiple visual prompt aides. Proc SPIE 4684:768-773, 2002
23. El-Kwae E, Xu H, Kabuka MR: Content-based retrieval in picture archiving and communication systems. J Digit Imag 13:70-81, 2000
24. Muller H, Rosset A, Garcia A, et al: Benefits of content-based visual data access in radiology. RadioGraphics 25:849-858, 2005
25. El-Napa I, Yang Y, Galatsanos NP, Nishikawa RM, Wernick MN: A similarity learning approach to content-based image retrieval: application to digital mammography. IEEE Trans Med Imag 23:1233-1244, 2004
26. Alto H, Rangayyan RM, Desautels JE: Content-based retrieval and analysis of mammographic masses. J Electron Imag 14:023016, 2005
27. Kinoshita SK, de Azevedo-Marques PM, Pereira RR, Rodrigues J, Rangayyan R: Content-based retrieval of mammograms using visual features related to breast density patterns. J Digit Imag 20:172-190, 2007
28. Zheng B, Mello-Thoms C, Wang X, Abrams GS, et al: Interactive computer aided diagnosis of breast masses: computerized selection of visually similar image sets from a reference library. Acad Radiol 14:917-927, 2007
29. Mazurowski MA, Habas PA, Zurada JM, Tourassi GD: Decision optimization of case-based computer-aided decision systems using genetic algorithm with application to mammography. Phys Med Biol 53:895-908, 2008
30. Muramatsu C, Li Q, Schmidt RA, et al: Determination of subjective similarity for pairs of masses and pairs of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: comparison of similarity ranking scores and absolute similarity ratings. Med Phys 34:2890-2895, 2007
31. Gur D, Stalder JS, Hardesty LA, Zheng B, Sumkin JH: Computeraided detection performance in mammographic examination of masses: assessment. Radiology 223:418-423, 2004
32. Zheng B, Lu A, Hardesty LA, et al: A method to improve visual similarity of breast masses for an interactive computer-aided diagnosis environment. Med Phys 33:111-117, 2006
33. Park SC, Wang XH, Zheng B: Assessment of performance improvement in content-based medical image retrieval schemes using fractal dimension. Acad Radiol 16:1171-1178, 2009
34. Park SC, Pu J, Zheng B: Improving performance of computeraided detection scheme by combining results from two machine learning classifiers. Acad Radiol 16:266-274, 2009
35. Wang XH, Park SC, Zheng B: Improving performance of contentbased image retrieval schemes in searching for similar breast mass regions: an assessment. Phys Med Biol 54:949-961, 2009
36. Mitchell TM: Machine learning. WCR/McGraw-Hill, Boston, 1997
37. Park SC, Sukthankar R, Mummert L, Satyanarayanan M, Zheng B: Optimization of reference library used in content-based medical image retrieval scheme. Med Phys 34:4331-4339, 2007
38. Yang L, Jin R, Mummert L, Sukthankar R, Goode A, Zheng B, Satyanarayanan M: A boosting framework for visuality-preserving distance metric learning and its application to medical image retrieval. IEEE Trans on PAMI 32:30-44, 2010
39. Wang XH, Park SC, Zheng B: Assessment of performance and reliability of computer-aided detection scheme using content-based image retrieval approach and limited reference database. J Digit Imag 24:352-359, 2011