Format and readability of an enhanced invitation letter did not affect participation rates in a cancer registry-based study: A randomized controlled trial

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 66, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 85-94

  Hall, Alix E ^a   Sanson Fisher, Rob W ^a   Lynagh, Marita C ^a   Threlfall, Timothy ^b   D'Este, Catherine A ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

^b DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH   (Australia)

^c HUNTER MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cancer registry; Patient communication; Patient information; Patient letter; Patient recruitment; Randomized controlled trial

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER REGISTRY; CANCER SURVIVOR; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INVITATION LETTER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; WRITING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUSTRALIA; CORRESPONDENCE AS TOPIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS; PATIENT SELECTION; REGISTRIES; SURVIVORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84870060842     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: 18785921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.07.016     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cancer registration in Australia. Canberra, Australia; AIWH; Available at http://www.aihw.gov.au/ cancer-registration-in-australia/. [Accessed August 2011].
2. R. Sanson-Fisher, M. Carey, L. Mackenzie, D. Hill, S. Campbell, and D. Turner Reducing inequities in cancer care Cancer 115 2009 3597 3605
3. M.P. Coleman, C.S. Muir, and F. Menegoz Confidentiality in the cancer registry Br J Cancer 66 1992 1138 1149
4. D.M. Parkin The evolution of the population-based cancer registry Nat Rev Cancer 6 2006 603 612
5. L.M. Beskow, R.S. Sandler, and M. Weinberger Research recruitment through US central cancer registries: balancing privacy and scientific issues Am J Public Health 96 2006 1920 1926
6. H.S. Campbell, R. Sanson-Fisher, D. Turner, L. Hayward, X.S. Wang, and J. Taylor-Brown Psychometric properties of cancer survivors' unmet needs survey Support Care Cancer 19 2011 221 230
7. A. Girgis, A. Boyes, R. Sanson-Fisher, and S. Burrows Perceived needs of women diagnosed with breast cancer: rural versus urban location Aust N Z J Public Health 24 2000 166 173
8. T. Smith, K.D. Stein, C.C. Mehta, C. Kaw, J.L. Kepner, and T. Buskirk The rationale, design, and implementation of the American Cancer Society's studies of cancer survivors Cancer 109 2007 1 12
9. U.S. Department of Education National Center for Education Statistics 2001 Digest of Education Statistics Washington, DC 2002
10. T.C. Davis, M.V. Williams, E. Marin, R.M. Parker, and J. Glass Health literacy and cancer communication CA Cancer J Clin 52 3 2002 134 149
11. C. Shieh, and B. Hosei Printed health information materials: evaluation of readability and suitability J Community Health Nurs 25 2008 73 90
12. M.S. Wolf, T.C. Davis, W.H. Shrank, M. Neuberger, and R.M. Parker A critical review of FDA-approved medication guides Patient Educ Couns 62 2006 316 322
13. C.A. Estrada, M. Martin-Hryniewicz, V. Higgs, C. Collins, and J.C. Byrd Anticoagulant patient information material is written at high readability levels Stroke 31 2000 2966 2970
14. R.E. Rudd, and J.E. Anderson The health literacy environment of hospitals and health centers: partners for action making your healthcare facility literacy-friendly 2006 Harvard University Boston, MA
15. R.E. Rudd, J.E. Anderson, S. Oppenheimer, and C. Nath Health literacy: an update of medical and public literature J.P. Comings, B. Garner, C. Smith, Review of adult learning and literacy: connecting research, policy and practice 2007 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Mahwah, NJ 175 203
16. S.M. Sharp Consent documents for oncology trials: does anybody read these things? Am J Clin Oncol 27 2004 570 575
17. T. Hoffmann, and L. Worrall Designing effective written health education materials: considerations for health professionals Disabil Rehabil 26 19 2004 1166 1173
18. J. Griffin, K. McKenna, and L. Tooth Written health education materials: making them more effective Aust Occup Ther J 50 3 2003 170 177
19. Directorate-General for Translation European Commission How to write clearly 2010 European Commission Translation and drafting resources Brussels & Luxembourg, UK Available at http://ec.europa.eu/translation/index-en.htm (Accessed June 2010)
20. Ministry of Health New Zealand National guideline for health education resource development in New Zealand 2002 Ministry of Health New Zealand Wellington, New Zealand
21. National Cancer Institute Clear & simple: developing effective print material for low-literate readers 2003 National Cancer Institute Bethesda, MD Available at http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/cancerlibrary/clear-and-simple (Accessed April 2011)
22. National Health Service National Health Service written information: general guidance 2010 National Health Service London, UK Available at http://www.nhsidentity.nhs.uk/tools-and-resources/patient-information/ written-information%3a-general-guidance (Accessed June 2011)
23. C.L. Paul, S. Redman, and R. Sanson-Fisher The development of a checklist of content and design characteristics for printed health materials Health Promot J Aust 7 3 1997 153 159
24. R. Clerehan, R. Buchbinder, and J. Moodie A linguistic framework for assessing the quality of written patient information: its use in assessing methotrexate information for rheumatoid arthritis Health Educ Res 20 3 2005 334 344
25. C.L. Paul, and S. Redman A review of the effectiveness of print material in changing health-related knowledge, attitudes and behaviour Health Promot J Aust 7 2 1997 91 99
26. C.L. Paul, S. Redman, and R.W. Sanson-Fisher Print material content and design: is it relevant to effectiveness? Health Educ Res 18 2 2003 181 190
27. Redline C, Oliver J, Fecso R. The effect of cover letter appeals and visual design on response rates in a government mail survey. Annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research; Pointe Hilton, Tapatio Cliffs, Phoenix, AZ; 2004:4873-80.
28. P.J. Gendall The effect on mail survey response rates of covering letters and questionnaire cover design 2003 Massey University Palmerston North, New Zealand
29. P. Gendall Which letter worked best? Market Bull 5 1994 53 56
30. W. Mockovak The impact of visual design in survey cover letters on response and web take-up rates 2011 Washington Bureau of Labor Statistics Washington, DC
31. W.G. Wagner, and W.M. O'Toole The effects of cover letter format on faculty response rate in mail survey research Educ Psychol Res 5 1 1985 29 37
32. B.J. Kelly, T.K. Fraze, and R.C. Hornik Response rates to a mailed survey of a representative sample of cancer patients randomly drawn from the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry: a randomized trial of incentive and length effects BMC Med Res Methodol 10 65 2010
33. F. Mols, S. Oerlemans, J. Denollet, J.A. Roukema, and L.V. van de Poll-Franse Type D personality is associated with increased comorbidity burden and health care utilization among 3080 cancer survivors Gen Hosp Psychiatry 34 2012 352 359
34. F. Mols, N.K. Aaronson, A.J.J.M. Vingerhoets, J.W.W. Coebergh, G. Vreugdenhil, and M.L.M. Lybeert Quality of life among long-term non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors Cancer 109 2007 1659 1667
35. T.A. Brown, B.F. Chorpita, W. Korotitisch, and D.H. Barlow Psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS) in clinical samples Behav Res Ther 35 1997 79 89
36. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress management: clinical practice guidelines J Natl Compr Canc Netw 1 2003 344 374
37. L.F. Degner, J.A. Sloan, and P. Venkatesh The control preferences scale Can J Nurs Res 29 1997 21 43
38. M. Carey, A. Anderson, R. Sanson-Fisher, M. Lynagh, C.L. Paul, and F. Tzelepis How well are we meeting haematological cancer survivors' preferences for involvement in treatment decision making? Patient Educ Couns 88 1 2012 87 92
39. Kincaid JP, Fishburne RP, Rogers RL, Chissom BS. Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count, and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy enlisted personnel. Research Branch report 8-75. Memphis: Naval Air Station, 1975.
40. D.B. Friedman, and L. Hoffman-Goetz A systematic review of readability and comprehension instruments used for print and web-based cancer information Health Educ Behav 33 2006 352 373
41. M.K. Paasche-Orlow, H.A. Taylor, and F.L. Brancati Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability N Engl J Med 348 2003 721 726
42. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Information paper: outcomes of ABS views on remoteness consultation, Australia. In: ABS, Ed. Canberra, Australia; 2001. Trewin D. Information paper: Outcomes of ABS views on remoteness consultation, Australia 2001. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra; 2001; ABS Catalogue no. 1244.0.00.001.
43. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2004. Rural, regional and remote health: a guide to remoteness classifications. AIHW cat. no. PHE 53. Canberra: AIHW.
44. D. Hosmer, and S. Lemeshow Applied logistic regression 1989 Wiley New York, NY
45. T.C. Davis, H.J. Berkel, C.L. Arnold, I. Nandy, R.H. Jackson, and P.W. Murphy Intervention to increase mammography utilization in a public hospital J Gen Intern Med 13 1998 230 233
46. T.C. Davis, D.D. Fredrickson, C. Aronold, P.W. Murphy, M. Herbst, and J.A. Bocchini A polio immunization pamphlet with increased appeal and simplified language does not improve comprehension to an acceptable level Patient Educ Couns 33 1998 25 37
47. T.C. Davis, R.F. Holcombe, H.J. Berkel, S. Pramanik, and S.G. Divers Informed consent for clinical trials: a comparative study of standard versus simplified forms J Natl Cancer Inst 90 1998 668 674
48. T. Clinton-McHarg, M. Carey, R. Sanson-Fisher, and E. Tracey Recruitment of representative samples for low incidence cancer populations: do registries deliver? BMC Med Res Methodol 11 5 2011
49. A.E. Hall, A.W. Boyes, J. Bowman, R.A. Walsh, E.L. James, and A. Girgis Young adult cancer survivors' psychosocial well-being: a cross-sectional study assessing quality of life, unmet needs, and health behaviors Support Care Cancer 20 6 2011 1333 1341
50. P.A. Parker, W.F. Baile, C. De Moor, and L. Cohen Psychosocial and demographic predictors of quality of life in a large sample of cancer patients Psychooncology 12 2003 183 193
51. C.H. Kroenke, B. Rosner, W.Y. Chen, I. Kawachi, G.A. Colditz, and M.D. Holmes Functional impact breast cancer by age at diagnosis J Clin Oncol 22 2004 1849 1856
52. M.T. King, P. Kenny, A. Shiell, J. Hall, and J. Boyages Quality of life three months and one year after first treatment for early stage breast cancer: influence of treatment and patient characteristics Qual Life Res 9 7 2000 789 800
53. A. Bootsma-van der Wiel, E. van Exel, A.J.M. de Craen, J. Gussekloo, A.M. Lagaay, and D.L. Knook A high response rate is not essential to prevent selection bias: results from the Leiden 85-plus study J Clin Epidemiol 55 2002 1119 1125
54. P.J. Edwards, I. Roberts, M.J. Clarke, C. Diguiseppi, R. Wentz, and I. Kwan Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires (Review) Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3 2009 MR000008
55. B. Williams, L. Irvine, A.R. McGinnis, M.E. McMurdo, and I.K. Crombie When "no" might not quite mean "no"; the importance of informed and meaningful non-consent: results from a survey of individuals refusing participation in a health-related research project BMC Health Serv Res 7 59 2007
56. T. Boyle, J. Landrigan, C. Bulsara, L. Fritschi, and J. Heyworth Increasing study participation Letter to the editor Epidemiology 22 2011 279 280
57. S.E. Harrison, E.K. Watson, A.M. Ward, N.F. Khan, D. Turner, and E. Adams Primary health and supportive care needs of long-term cancer survivors: a questionnaire survey J Clin Oncol 29 2011 2091 2098
58. N.K. Arora, A.S. Hamilton, A.L. Potosky, J.H. Rowland, N.M. Aziz, and K.M. Bellizzi Population-based survivorship research using cancer registries: a study of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors J Cancer Surviv 1 2007 49 63
59. H. Boon, M. Stewart, M.A. Kennard, R. Gray, C. Sawka, and J.B. Brown Use of complementary/alternative medicine by breast cancer survivors in Ontario: prevalence and perceptions J Clin Oncol 8 2000 2515 2521
60. K.S. Courneya, K.H. Karvinen, K.L. Campbell, R.G. Pearcey, G. Dundas, and V. Capstick Associations among exercise, body weight, and quality of life in a population-based sample of endometrial cancer survivors Gynecol Oncol 97 2005 422 430
61. P. Affleck The challenge of recruitment Nurse Res 13 1 2005 78 84
62. B.G. Dicker, and D.L. Kent Physician consent and researchers' access to patients Epidemiology 1 1990 160 163