Evaluative design of e-government projects: A public value perspective

Association for Information Systems - 12th Americas Conference On Information Systems, AMCIS 2006

Volumn 1, Issue , 2006, Pages 239-248

  Grimsley, Mike ^a   Meehan, Anthony ^b   Gupta, Kushaan Sen ^c  

^a SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c Bidborough House   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Customer satisfaction; Design; E government; Evaluation; Information systems; Public value; Trust

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY WELLS; DESIGN FRAMEWORKS; E-GOVERNMENT; EVALUATION; LONDON , UK; PUBLIC VALUES; SOCIAL INCLUSION; TRUST;

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

DESIGN;

EID: 84870037294     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Ballantine, J.A., Galliers, R. D. and Stray S. J. (1999) Information Systems/Technology Evaluation Practices: Evidence from UK Organisations, in L. P. Willcocks and S. Lester (Eds.) Beyond the IT Productivity Paradox, John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, England, 123-149.
2. Braithwaite, V. and Levi, M. (Eds.) (1998) Trust and Governance. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
3. Borough of Camden (2003) A Guide to the Council's Housing Allocations Scheme. London Borough of Camden, UK.
4. Carroll, J.M. and Swatman, P.A. (2000) Structured-case: a methodological framework for building theory in information systems research, European Journal of Information Systems, 9, 235-242.
5. Chan, D.L. and Harkness, V. (2004) Home Connections Focus Groups Report. London Borough of Camden, UK.
6. CIO (2005) Transformational Government: Enabled by Technology. Chief Information Officer Council, Cabinet Office. http://www.cio.gov.uk/transformational_government/strategy/contents/
7. Coleman, J. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
8. Damodaran, L., Nicholls, J., Henney, A., Land, F. and Farbey, B. (2005) The contribution of sociotechnical systems thinking to the effective adoption of e-government and the enhancement of democracy. The Electronic Journal of e-Government, 3, 1, 1-12 http://www.ejeg.com/.
9. Duffy, B., Browning, P. and Skinner, G. (2003). Trust in Public Institutions: A report for the Audit Commission. MORI.
10. Farbey, B. Land, F. and Targett, D. (1999) Evaluating Investments in IT: Findings and a Framework, in L. P. Willcocks and S. Lester (Eds.) Beyond the IT Productivity Paradox, John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, England, 183-215.
11. Fukuyama, F. (1995) The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. London: Free Press.
12. Green, G., Grimsley, M. and Stafford, B. (2005) The Dynamics of Neighbourhood Sustainability, Joseph Rowntree Foundation: York Publishing Services. http://www.jrf.org.uk/bookshop/eBooks/1859353045.pdf
13. Grimsley, M., Meehan, A., Green, G. and Stafford, B. (2003) Social Capital and Community Trust and e-Government Services, in P. Nixon and S. Terzis (Eds.) Trust Management 2003, First International Conference on Trust Management, Hiraklion, Crete, Greece, May 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2692, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 165-178.
14. Grimsley, M., Meehan, A. and Tan, A. (2004a) Promoting social inclusion: managing trust-based relations between users and providers of public services. European Academy of Management, St. Andrews, UK, 5-8 May, 2004. http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~euram04/proceedings/contents.shtml#tracktr and http://mcs.open.ac.uk/am4469/
15. Grimsley, M., Meehan, A. and Tan, A. (2004b) Designing for Social Inclusion: Computer Mediation of Trust Relations Between Citizens and Public Service Providers, in S. Fincher, P. Markopoulos, D. Moore and R. Ruddle (Eds) People and Computers XVIII - Design for Life: Proceedings of HCI 2004, Springer-Verlag, London, 197-210.
16. th Sept, http://uxisweb1.brunel.ac.uk/iseingsites/egov05/Source%20Files/Papers/CameraReady-26-P.pdf
17. Grootaert, G. (1998) Social Capital: The Missing Link. SCI Working Paper No.3, April 1998, World Bank.
18. HMT (2004) Her Majesty's Treasury Spending Review 2004, Public Sector Service Agreements Ch 01 Introduction. Her Majesty's Treasury, http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/spending_review/spend_sr04/psa/spend_sr04_psaindex.cfm
19. Hirchheim, R. and Smithson, S. (1999) Evaluation of Information Systems: a Critical Assessment, in L. P. Willcocks and S. Lester (Eds.) Beyond the IT Productivity Paradox, John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, England, 381-409
20. Irani, Z and Love, P.E.D. (2002) Developing a Frame of Reference for Ex-ante IT/IS Investment Evaluation, European Journal of Information Systems, 11, 1, 74-82.
21. Irani, Z., Love, P.E.D., Elliman, T., Jones, S. and Themistocleous, M. (2005) Evaluating e-government: learning from the experiences of two UK local authorities. Information Systems Journal, 15, 61-82.
22. Jones, S. and Hughes, J. (2001) Understanding IS evaluation as a complex social process: a case study of a UK local authority. European Journal of Information Systems, 10, 189-203.
23. Kelly, G., Mulgan, G. and Muers, S. (2002) Creating Public Value: An analytical framework for public service reform, Strategy Unit discussion paper, Cabinet Office, http://www.strategy.gov.uk/downloads/files/public_value2.pdf
24. Klecun, E. and Cornford, T. (2005) A critical approach to evaluation. European Journal of Information Systems, 14, 3, 229-243.
25. Lin, N (2001) Social Capital: a Theory of Social Structure and Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Love, P.E.D and Irani, Z. (2003) A project management quality cost information system for the construction industry. Information and Management, 40, 7, 649-661.
27. MORI (2001). Attitudes to Key Public Services - research review conducted for the Cabinet Office, MORI, 2001. http://www.strategy.gov.uk/downloads/files/satisfaction.pdf
28. Moore, M.H. (1995) Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
29. ODPM (2005) Inclusion Through Innovation: Tackling Social Exclusion Through New Technologies, Social Exclusion Unit Final Report, November 2005, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London. http://www.socialexclusionunit.gov.uk/page.asp?id=583
30. ODPM (2004) Breaking the Cycle, Social Exclusion Unit, Office of The Deputy Prime Minister. http://www.socialexclusion.gov.uk/downloaddoc.asp?id=262
31. Powell, P. L. (1999) Evaluation of Information Technology Investments: Business as usual, in L. P. Willcocks and S. Lester (Eds.) Beyond the IT Productivity Paradox, John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, England, 151-182.
32. Rothstein, B. and Eek, D. (2001) The Causal Mechanism between Trust in Authorities and Trust in Others: An Experimental Approach http://www.ex.ac.uk/shipss/politics/research/socialcapital/other/rothstein3.pdf
33. Walsham, G. (1999) Interpretive Evaluation Design for Information Systems, in L. P. Willcocks and S. Lester (Eds.) Beyond the IT Productivity Paradox, John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, England, 183-215.
34. Waltho, D. (2005) Creating and Measuring Public Value. Ministerial eGovernment Conference 2005, Cabinet Office http://www.e-europeawards.org/view_extern.asp?id=9514 p. 27
35. Warren, M.E. (2001) Social Capital and Corruption, in D. Castiglione (Ed.) Social Capital: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. EURESCO Conference on Social Capital, 15-20 September, Exeter, UK. University of Exeter, School of Historical, Political andSociological Studies, Department of Politics http://www.ex.ac.uk/shipss/politics/research/socialcapital/papers/warren.pdf
36. Willcocks, L. P. and Lester, S. (1999) In Search of Information Technology Productivity: Assessment Issues, in L. P. Willcocks and S. Lester (Eds.) Beyond the IT Productivity Paradox, John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, England, 69-97.