Corrigendum to "Urban growth of the Washington, D.C.-Baltimore, MD metropolitan region from 1984 to 2010 by annual, Landsat-based estimates of impervious cover" [Remote Sensing of Environment 129 (2013) 42-53], DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2012.10.025;Urban growth of the Washington, D.C.-Baltimore, MD metropolitan region from 1984 to 2010 by annual, Landsat-based estimates of impervious cover

Remote Sensing of Environment

Volumn 129, Issue , 2013, Pages 42-53

  Sexton, Joseph O ^a   Song, Xiao Peng ^a   Huang, Chengquan ^a   Channan, Saurabh ^a   Baker, Matthew E ^b   Townshend, John R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

Author keywords

Baltimore, MD; Chesapeake Bay; Impervious surface; Land cover; Landsat; Urbanization; Washington, DC

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; LAND USE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SNOW;

BALTIMORE; CHESAPEAKE BAY; IMPERVIOUS SURFACE; LAND COVER; LANDSAT; URBANIZATION; WASHINGTON;

URBAN GROWTH;

AGRICULTURAL LAND; DATA ACQUISITION; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; FRAGMENTATION; LANDSAT; METROPOLITAN AREA; SNOW COVER; SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; URBAN GROWTH; URBAN PLANNING;

BALTIMORE; CHESAPEAKE BAY; DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; MARYLAND; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA];

EID: 84869865583     PISSN: 00344257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2014.09.014     Document Type: Erratum

References (51)

1. Cohen W.B., Yang Z., Kennedy R. Detecting trends in forest disturbance and recovery using yearly Landsat time series: 2. TimeSync - Tools for calibration and validation. Remote Sensing of Environment 2010, 114(12):2911-2924.
2. Daily G.C., Matson P.A. Ecosystem services: From theory to implementation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2008, 105(28):9455-9456.
3. Danaher T., Wu X., Campbell N. Bi-directional reflectance distribution function approaches to radiometric calibration of Landsat ETM+ imagery. Proceedings of the IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) 2001, 7031-7034.
4. Davis K. The world demographic transition. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 1945, 237(1):1-11.
5. Friedl M., McIver D., Hodges J.C., Zhang X., Muchoney D., Strahler A., et al. Global land cover mapping from MODIS: Algorithms and early results. Remote Sensing of Environment 2002, 83(1-2):287-302.
6. Goetz S.J., Wright R.K., Smith A.J., Zinecker E., Schaub E. IKONOS imagery for resource management: Tree cover, impervious surfaces, and riparian buffer analyses in the mid-Atlantic region. Remote Sensing of Environment 2003, 88(1-2):195-208.
7. Goward S., Arvldson T., Williams D., Faundeen J., Irons J., Franks S. Historical record of landsat global coverage: Mission operations, NSLRSDA, and international cooperator stations. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 2006, 72(10):1155-1169.
8. Gutman G., Masek J.G. Long-term time series of the Earth's land-surface observations from space. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2012, 33(15):4700-4719.
9. Hansen M.C., Defries R.S., Townshend J.R.G., Sohlberg R. Global land cover classification at 1km spatial resolution using a classification tree approach. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2000, 21(6-7):1331-1364.
10. Hansen M.C., Stehman S.V., Potapov P.V. Quantification of global gross forest cover loss. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2010, 107(19):8650-8655.
11. Hodgson M.E., Jensen J.R., Tullis J.A., Riordan K.D., Archer C.M. Synergistic use of LiDAR and color aerial photography for mapping urban parcel imperviousness. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 1999, 29203:973-980.
12. Homer C., Huang C., Yang L., Wylie B., Coan M. Development of a 2001 national land-cover database for the United States. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 2004, 70(7):829-840.
13. Huang C., Goward S., Masek J., Gao F., Vermote E., Thomas N., et al. Development of time series stacks of Landsat images for reconstructing forest disturbance history. International Journal of Digital Earth 2009, 2(3):195-218.
14. Huang C., Goward S.N., Schleeweis K., Thomas N., Masek J.G., Zhu Z. Dynamics of national forests assessed using the Landsat record: Case studies in eastern United States. Remote Sensing of Environment 2009, 113(7):1430-1442.
15. Huang C., Thomas N., Goward S.N., Masek J.G., Zhu Z., Townshend J.R.G., et al. Automated masking of cloud and cloud shadow for forest change analysis using Landsat images. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2010, 31(20):5449-5464.
16. Jantz P., Goetz S., Jantz C. Urbanization and the loss of resource lands in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Environmental Management 2005, 36(6):808-825.
17. Jensen J.R., Cowen D.C. Remote sensing of urban/suburban infrastructure and socio-economic attributes. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 1999, 65(5):611-622.
18. Jiang L., Liao M., Lin H., Yang L. Synergistic use of optical and InSAR data for urban impervious surface mapping: A case study in Hong Kong. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2009, 30(11):2781-2796.
19. Kennedy R.E., Yang Z., Cohen W.B. Detecting trends in forest disturbance and recovery using yearly Landsat time series: 1. LandTrendr - Temporal segmentation algorithms. Remote Sensing of Environment 2010, 114(12):2897-2910.
20. Kim D.-H., Narasimhan R., Sexton J.O.S., Huang C., Townshend J.R. Methodology to select phenologically suitable Landsat scenes for forest change detection. International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) 2011, 2613-2616.
21. Lambin E.F., Geist H.J., Lepers E. Dynamics of land-use and land-cover change in tropical regions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 2003, 28:205-241.
22. Legendre P., Legendre L. Numerical ecology 1998, Elsevier BV, Amsterdam. 2nd ed.
23. Loveland T.R., Reed B.C., Brown J.F., Ohlen D.O., Zhu Z., Yang L., et al. Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1km AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2000, 21(6-7):1303-1330.
24. Lunetta R.S., Johnson D.M., Lyon J.G., Crotwell J. Impacts of imagery temporal frequency on land-cover change detection monitoring. Remote Sensing of Environment 2004, 89:444-454.
25. Maryland State Archives Maryland at a glance Accessed February 22, 2012. http://2010.census.gov/2010census/data/apportionment-pop-text.php.
26. Masek J.G., Lindsay F.E., Goward S.N. Dynamics of urban growth in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area, 1973-1996, from Landsat observations. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2000, 21(18):3473-3486.
27. Masek J.G., Vermote E.F., Saleous N.E., Wolfe R., Hall F.G., Huemmrich K.F., et al. A Landsat surface reflectance dataset for North America, 1990-2000. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 2006, 3(1):68-72.
28. Menke S.B., Guénard B., Sexton J.O., Weiser M.D., Dunn R.R., Silverman J. Urban areas may serve as habitat and corridors for dry-adapted, heat tolerant species: An example from ants. Urban Ecosystems 2010, 14:135-163.
29. Oke T. The energetic basis of the urban heat island. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 2006, 108(455):1-24.
30. Pickett S.T.A. Space-for-time substitution as an alternative to long-term studies. Long-term studies in ecology: Approaches and alternatives 1989, 110-135. Springer-Verlag, New York. G.E. Likens (Ed.).
31. Potere D., Schneider A., Angel S., Civco L. Mapping urban areas on a global scale: Which of the eight maps now available is more accurate?. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2009, 30:37-41.
32. Quinlan J.R. C4.5: Programs for machine learning 1993, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA.
33. Roy D.P., Ju J., Kline K., Scaramuzza P.L., Kovalskyy V., Hansen M., et al. Web-enabled Landsat Data (WELD): Landsat ETM+ composited mosaics of the conterminous United States. Remote Sensing of Environment 2010, 114(1):35-49.
34. Schneider A., Friedl M.A., Potere D. A new map of global urban extent from MODIS satellite data. Environmental Research Letters 2009, 4(4). (044003 (11 pp.)).
35. Sexton J.O., Urban D.L., Donohue M.J., Song C. Long-term land cover dynamics by multi-temporal classification across the Landsat-5 record. Remote Sensing of Environment 2013, 128:246-258.
36. Small C., Pozzi F., Elvidge C. Spatial analysis of global urban extent from DMSP-OLS night lights. Remote Sensing of Environment 2005, 96(3-4):277-291.
37. Suarez-Rubio M., Lookingbill T.R., Elmore A.J. Exurban development derived from Landsat from 1986 to 2009 surrounding the District of Columbia, USA. Remote Sensing of Environment 2012, 124:360-370.
38. Taubenböck H., Esch T., Felbier A., Wiesner M., Roth A., Dech S. Monitoring urbanization in mega cities from space. Remote Sensing of Environment 2012, 117:162-176.
39. Townshend J.R., Masek J.G., Huang C., Vermote E.F., Gao F., Channan S., Sexton J.O., Feng M., Narasimhan R., Kim D.-H., Song K., Song D., Song X.-P., Noojipady P., Tan B., Hansen M.C., Li M., Wolfe R.E. Global characterization and monitoring of forest cover using Landsat data: Opportunities... and challenges. International Journal of Digital Earth 2012, 5:373-397.
40. Thomas N., Hendrix C., Congalton R.G. A comparison of urban mapping methods using high-resolution digital imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 2003, 69(9):963-972.
41. Turner B.L., Lambin E.F., Reenberg A. The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2007, 104(52):20666-20671.
42. UNFPA (United Nations Population Fund) State of world population in 2011 http://foweb.unfpa.org/SWP2011/reports/EN-SWOP2011-FINAL.pdf.
43. US Census Bureau Resident population data accessed, Accessed February 22, 2012. http://2010.census.gov/2010census/data/apportionment-pop-text.php.
44. Vermote E.F., Kotchenova S. Atmospheric correction for the monitoring of land surfaces. Journal of Geophysical Research 2008, 113(D23):D23S90.
45. Walsh C.J., Roy A.H., Feminella J.W., Cottingham P.D., Groffman P.M., Morgan R.P. The urban stream syndrome: Current knowledge and the search for a cure. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 2005, 24:706-723.
46. Weng Q. Remote sensing of impervious surfaces in the urban areas: Requirements, methods, and trends. Remote Sensing of Environment 2012, 117:34-49.
47. Westervelt J., BenDor T., Sexton J. A technique for rapidly forecasting regional urban growth. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2011, 38(1):61-81.
48. Whitehurst A.S., Sexton J.O., Dollar L. Land cover change in western Madagascar's dry deciduous forests: A comparison of forest changes in and around Kirindy Mite National Park. Oryx 2009, 43:275-283.
49. Yang L., Huang C., Homer C.G., Wylie B.K., Coan M.J. An approach for mapping large-area impervious surfaces: Synergistic use of Landsat-7 ETM+ and high spatial resolution imagery. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 2003, 29(2):230-240.
50. Yang L., Jiang L., Liao M. Quantifying sub-pixel urban impervious surface through fusion of optical and InSAR imagery. GIScience and Remote Sensing 2009, 46:161-171.
51. Yin J., Yin Z., Zhong H., Xu S., Hu X., Wang J., et al. Monitoring urban expansion and land use/land cover changes of Shanghai metropolitan area during the transitional economy (1979-2009) in China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2011, 177(1):609-621.