Impacts of imagery temporal frequency on land-cover change detection monitoring

Remote Sensing of Environment

Volumn 89, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 444-454

  Lunetta, Ross S ^a   Johnson, David M ^a   Lyon, John G ^a   Crotwell, Jill ^a  

^a U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

Accuracy assessment; Land cover change; Remote sensing; Temporal frequency

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; ECOSYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING; ERROR ANALYSIS; IMAGING SYSTEMS; VEGETATION;

LAND COVER (LC) CHANGES;

REMOTE SENSING;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; DEFORESTATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; LAND COVER; LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER; REMOTE SENSING;

NORTH AMERICA; NORTH CAROLINA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 1242321271     PISSN: 00344257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2003.10.022     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bara T.J., Shaw D.M. Multi-resolution land characteristics consortium: Documentation notebook, internal report. 1995;U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC.
2. Cohen W.B., Fiorella M. Comparison of methods for detecting conifer forest change with Thematic Mapper imagery. Lunetta R.S., Elvidge C.D. Remote sensing change detection: Environmental monitoring methods and applications. 1998;89-102 Taylor and Francis, UK.
3. Currie D.J., Paquin V. Large-scale biogeographical patterns of species richness of trees. Nature. 329:1987;326-327.
4. Elvidge C.D., Miura T., Jansen W.T., Groeneveld D.P., Ray J. Monitoring trends in wetland vegetation using a Landsat MSS time series. Lunetta R.S., Elvidge C.D. Remote sensing change detection: Environmental monitoring methods and applications. 1998;191-210 Taylor and Francis, UK.
5. Elvidge C.D., Yuan D., Weerackoon R.D., Lunetta R.S. An automated scattergram controlled regression technique for image normalization. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing. 61(10):1995;1255-1260.
6. Fiorella M., Ripple W.J. Analysis of conifer forest regeneration using Landsat Thematic Mapper data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing. 59(9):1993;1383-1388.
7. Fung T. An assessment of TM imagery for land-cover change detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. 28(4):1990;681-692.
8. Jackson R.D. Spectrial indicies in n-space. Remote Sensing of Environment. 13:1983;409-421.
9. Jensen J.R., Ramsey E.W., Mackey H.E. Jr., Christensen E.J., Sharitz R.R. Inland wetland change detection using aircraft MSS data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing. 53(5):1987;521-529.
10. Jones, B. A., Ritters, K. H., Wickham, J. D., Tankersley, R. D. Jr., O'Neill, R. V., Chaloud, D. J.,. Smith, E. R., & Neale, A. C., (1997). An Ecological Assessment of the United States Mid-Atlantic Region: A Landscape Atlas, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Report No. EPA/600/R-97/130, U.S. Printing Office, Washington, DC, 104 pp.
11. Knight J.F., Lunetta R.S. An experimental assessment of minimum mapping unit size. IEEE Transactions on Remote Sensing. 41(9):2003;2132-2134.
12. Loveland T.R., Sohl T.L., Stehman S.V., Gallant A.L., Sayler K.L., Napton D.E. A strategy for estimating them rates of recent United States land-cover change. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing. 68(10):2002;1091-1099.
13. Lunetta R.S. Multi-temporal remote sensing analytical approaches for characterizing landscape change. Proceedings of First International Workshop on the analysis of multi-temporal remote sensing images, September 12-14, 2001, Trento, Italy Bruzzone L., Smits P. Analysis of multi-temporal remote sensing images. vol. 2:2002;339-346 World Scientific Publishing, Singapore.
14. Lunetta R.S., Alvarez R., Edmonds C.M., Lyon J.G., Elvidge C.D., Bonifaz R., García C., Gómez G., Castro R., Bernal A., Cabrera A.L. An assessment of NALC/Mexico land cover mapping results: Implications for assessing landscape condition. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 23(16):2002;3129-3168.
15. Lunetta R.S., Ediriwickrema J., Johnson D., Lyon J.G., McKerrow A. Impacts of vegetation dynamics on the identification of land-cover change in a biologically complex community in North Carolina, USA. Remote Sensing of Environment. 82:2002;258-270.
16. Lyon J.G., Yuan D., Lunetta R.S., Elvidge C.D. A change detection experiment using vegetation indices. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing. 64(2):1998;143-150.
17. Muchoney D.M., Haack B.N. Change detection for monitoring forest defoliation. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing. 60(10):1994;1243-1251.
18. Nelson R., Horning N., Stone T.A. Determining the rate of forest conversions in Mato Grosso, Brazil using Landsat MSS and AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 8(12):1987;1767-1784.
19. Ecological indicators for the nation. 2000;National Academy Press, Washington, DC. 180 pp.
20. Environment and sustainable development indicators for Canada. 2003;Renouf Publishing, Ottawa, ON. 54 pp.+Appendices.
21. Omernik J.M. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 77:1987;118-125.
22. Sala O.S., Parton W.J., Joyce L.A., Lauenroth W.K. Primary production of the central grassland region of the United States. Ecology. 69:1988;40-45.
23. Historical climatic summaries for North Carolina. 2003;SE Regional Climate Center, Columbia, SC.
24. Singh A. Digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 10(6):1989;989-2003.
25. Skole D., Tucker C. Tropical deforestation and habitat fragmentation in the Amazon: Satellite data from 1978 to 1988. Science. 260:1993;1905-1910.
26. Stiling P.D. Ecology: Theory and applications. 2nd ed. 1996;Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
27. Vogelmann J.E., Sohl T., Howard S.M. Regional characterization of land cover using multiple sources of data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing. 64(1):1998;45-57.
28. Zhan X., Sohlberg R.A., Townshend R.G., DiMiceli C., Carroll M.L., Eastman J.C., Hansen M.C., DeFries R.S. Detection of land cover changes using MODIS 250 m data. Remote Sensing of Environment. 83:2002;336-350.