Correction: The behavioral response of larval amphibians (ranidae) to threats from predators and parasites(PLoS ONE (2018) 7:11(e49592) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049592);The Behavioral Response of Larval Amphibians (Ranidae) to Threats from Predators and Parasites

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 11, 2012, Pages

  Szuroczki, Dorina ^a,b   Richardson, Jean M L ^a,c  

^a BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c BAMFIELD MARINE SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF COVARIANCE; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ARTICLE; BULLFROG; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE PREDISPOSITION; LITHOBATES CLAMITANS; LITHOBATES SYLVATICUS; MORPHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PARASITE LOAD; PREDATOR PREY INTERACTION; RANIDAE; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; THREAT; TREMATODE;

EID: 84869752529     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203252     Document Type: Erratum

References (42)

1. Lima SL, Dill LM, (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation- a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68: 619-640.
2. Taylor RJ (1984) Predation. New York, U.S.A: Chapman and Hall.
3. Seale DB, Wassersug RJ, (1979) Suspension feeding dynamics of anuran larvae related to their functional morphology. Oecologia 39: 259-272.
4. Anholt BR, Werner EE, (1995) Interaction between food availability and predation mortality mediated by adaptive behavior. Ecology 76: 2230-2234 doi:10.2307/1941696.
5. Lawler SP, (1989) Behavioral responses to predators and predation risk in four species of larval anurans. Anim Behav 38: 1039-1047.
6. Richardson JML, (2001) A comparative study of activity levels in larval anurans and response to the presence of different predators. Behav Ecol 12: 51-58.
7. Liem KF, (1961) On the taxonomic status of the granular patches of the Javanese frog Rana chalconota Schlegel. Herpetologica 17: 69-71.
8. Relyea RA, (2001) The relationship between predation risk and antipredator responses in larval anurans. Ecology 82: 541-554.
9. Van Buskirk J, Relyea RA, (1998) Selection for phenotypic plasticity in Rana sylvatica tadpoles. Biol J Linn Soc 65: 301-328.
10. Raffel TR, Martin LB, Rohr JR, (2008) Parasites as predators: unifying natural enemy ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 23: 610-618 doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.06.015.
11. Johnson PTJ, McKenzie VJ (2008) Emerging helminthiases in amphibians: lessons from Ribeiroia and Echinostoma. In: Fried B, Toledo R, editors. The Biology of Echinostomes. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
12. Huffman JE, Fried B, (1990) Echinostoma and Echinostomiasis. Adv Parasitol 29: 215-269.
13. Prudhoe S, Bray RA (1982) Platyhelminth parasites of the Amphibia. Oxford, U.K: Oxford University Press.
14. Fried B, Pane PL, Reddy A, (1997) Experimental infection of Rana pipiens tadpoles with Echinostoma trivolvis cercariae. Parasitol Res 83: 666-669.
15. Szuroczki D, Richardson JML, (2009) The role of trematode parasites in larval anuran communities: an aquatic ecologist's guide to the major players. Oecologia 161: 371-385.
16. Koprivnikar J, Forbes MR, Baker RL, (2006) On the efficacy of anti-parasite behaviour: a case study of tadpole susceptibility to cercariae of Echinostoma trivolvis. Can J Zool 84: 1623-1629.
17. Rohr J, Swan A, Raffel T, Hudson P, (2009) Parasites, info-disruption, and the ecology of fear. Oecologia 159: 447-454 doi:10.1007/s00442-008-1208-6.
18. Taylor CN, Oseen KL, Wassersug RJ, (2004) On the behavioural response of Rana and Bufo tadpoles to echinostomatoid cercariae: implications to synergistic factors influencing trematode infections in anurans. Can J Zool 82: 701-706 doi:10.1139/z04-037.
19. Daly EW, Johnson PTJ, (2011) Beyond immunity: quantifying the effects of host anti-parasite behavior on parasite transmission. Oecologia 165: 1043-1050 doi:10.1007/s00442-010-1778-y.
20. Baker RL, Smith BP, (1997) Conflict between antipredator and antiparasite behaviour in larval damselflies. Oecologia 109: 622-628 doi:10.1007/s004420050125.
21. Schotthoefer AM, Cole RA, Beasley VR, (2003) Relationship of tadpole stage to location of echinostome cercariae encystment and the consequences for tadpole survival. J Parasitol 89: 475-482.
22. Szuroczki D, Richardson JML, (2011) Palatability in the larvae of three species of Lithobates. Herpetologica 67: 213-221.
23. Gosner KL, (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16: 183-190.
24. Schell SC (1970) How to Know the Trematodes. Dubuque, Iowa: WM. C. Brown Company Publishers.
25. Keeler S, Huffman JE (2009) Echinostomes in the second intermediate host. In: Toledo R, Fried B, editors. The Biology of Echinostomes. New York: Springer. pp. 61-87.
26. Blumstein DT, Daniel JC, Evans CS (2000) JWatcher 0.9. An introductory user's guide. URL: http://www.jwatcher.ucla.edu. Accessed: 26 October 2012.
27. Thiemann GW, Wassersug RJ, (2000) Patterns and consequences of behavioural responses to predators and parasites in Rana tadpoles. Biol J Linn Soc 71: 513-528.
28. Thiemann GW, Wassersug RJ, (2000) Biased distribution of trematode metacercariae in the nephric system of Rana tadpoles. Journal of Zoology 252: 534-538.
29. R Core Team (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. URL: http://www.R-project.org/.
30. Koprivnikar J, Gibson CH, Redfern JC, (2012) Infectious personalities: behavioural syndromes and disease risk in larval amphibians. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 279: 1544-1550 doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.2156.
31. Fox J, Weisberg S (2011) An {R} Companion to Applied Regression. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. URL: http://socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion Accessed: 26 October 2012.
32. Crawley MJ (2007) The R Book. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.
33. Venables W, Ripley B (2002) Modern Applied Statistics with S. 4th edition. New York: Springer.
34. Skelly DK, Bolden SR, Freidenburg LK, Friedenfelds NA, Malcolm TR (2006) Urbanization and disease on amphibians. In: Collinge SK, and Ray, C., editor. Disease Ecology: Community Structure and Pathogen Dynamics Colorado Oxford University Press pp. 153-167.
35. Najarian H, (1955) Trematodes parasitic in the Salinetia in the vicinity of Ann Arbor, Michigan. Am Midl Nat 53: 195-197.
36. Harding JH (2006) Amphibians and Reptiles of the Great Lakes Region; Douglas MM, editor. Ann Arbor, U.S.A: The University of Michigan Press.
37. Johnson PTJ, Sutherland DR, Kinsella JM, Lunde KB, (2004) Review of the trematode genus Ribeiroia (Psilostomidae): ecology, life history and pathogenesis with special emphasis on the amphibian malformation problem. Adv Parasitol 57: 191-253 doi:10.1016/s0065-308x(04)57003-3.
38. Kiesecker JM, Skelly DK, (2000) Choice of oviposition site by gray treefrogs: the role of potential parasitic infection. Ecology 81: 2939-2943.
39. Decaestecker E, De Meester L, Ebert D, (2002) In deep trouble: habitat selection constrained by multiple enemies in zooplankton. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 5481-5485 doi:10.1073/pnas.082543099.
40. Orlofske SA, Jadin RC, Preston DL, Johnson PTJ, (2012) Parasite transmission in complex communities: predators and alternative hosts alter pathogenic infections in amphibians. Ecology 93: 1247-1253.
41. Belden LK, Wojdak JM, (2011) The combined influence of trematode parasites and predatory salamanders on wood frog (Rana sylvatica) tadpoles. Oecologia 166: 1077-1086 doi:10.1007/s00442-011-1946-8.
42. Hatcher MJ, Dick JTA, Dunn AM, (2006) How parasites affect interactions between competitors and predators. Ecol Lett 9: 1253-1271 doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00964.x.