(Not so) "Smart regulation"? Canadian shellfish aquaculture policy and the evolution of instrument choice for industrial development

Marine Policy

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 171-184

  Howlett, Michael ^a   Rayner, Jeremy ^b  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b VANCOUVER ISLAND UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Aquaculture policy and regulation; Canadian marine policy; Network governance; Self regulation; Shellfish

Indexed keywords

AQUACULTURE; FISHERY POLICY; INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT; REGULATORY APPROACH; SHELLFISH FISHERY;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 0842284396     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0308-597X(03)00086-1     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Hume S. We are going to stop these fish farms: Omega Salmon's hatchery at Ocean Falls has become a lightning rod for B.C.'s growing aboriginal rebellion. Vancouver Sun 2003;1 Mar:A21;
2. Simpson S. Fishery officials license illegal catch. Vancouver Sun 2003;7 Feb:D3;
3. Rud J. Fish farm advisor an aquaculture supplier, NDP's MacPhail says. Vancouver Sun 2003;13 Feb:A19;
4. Simpson S. Shellfish farms disrupt; beaches. Vancouver Sun 2003;10 Jan:Fl;
5. Hume S. Lessons not learned in Ireland Sea trout supported a thriving business-until sea lice wiped them out. Vancouver Sun, 2003;22 Feb:A4;
6. McInnes C, LaVoie J. Van Dongen Embroiled in Row Over Fish Farm, Papers Show. Vancouver Sun 2003;5 Feb:A3.
7. Randolph J, Bauer M. Improving environmental decision-making through collaborative methods. Policy Studies Review 1999; 16(3/4):168-91.
8. Gunningham N, Grabosky P, Sinclair D. Smart regulation: designing environmental policy. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1998.
9. Cook D. Consultation, for a change? Engaging users and communities in the policy process. Social Policy, Administration. 2002;36(5):516-31;
10. Wondelleck JM, Manring NJ, Cowfoot JE. Teetering at the top of the ladder: the experience of citizen group participants in alternative dispute resolution processes. Sociological Perspectives 1996;39(2):249-62.
11. Suryanata K, Umemoto KN. Tension at the nexus of the global and the local: culture, property and marine aquaculture in Hawaii. Environment and Planning A 2003;35(2): 199-213.
12. Rhodes RAW. The new governance: governing without government. Political Studies 1996;44:652-67;
13. Rhodes RAW. From marketisation to diplomacy: it's the mix that matters. Australian Journal of Public Administration 1997; 56(2):40-54.
14. Gibson RB, editor. Voluntary initiatives: the new politics of corporate greening. Peterborough: Broadview Press; 1999.
15. Salamon LM, Lund MS. The tools approach: basic analytics. In: Salamon LS, editor. Beyond privatization: the tools of government action, Washington DC. Urban Institute: 1989. p. 23-50;
16. Salamon LM, editor. The tools of government: a guide to the new governance. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002;
17. Lowi TJ. The state in politics: the relation between policy and administration, In: Noll RG, editor. Regulatory policy and the social sciences. Berkeley: University of California Press: 1985; 67-105;
18. Bemelmans-Videc ML, Rist RC, Evert V, editor. Carrots, sticks and sermons: policy instruments and their evaluation. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers: 1998;
19. Peters BG, Van Nispen FKM, editors. Public policy instruments: evaluating the tools of public administration. New York: Edward Elgar: 1998.
20. Lasswell. Politics: who gets what, when, how. New York: Meridian 1958. p. 204.
21. French JRP, Raven B. The bases of social power. In: Cartwright D, editor. Studies in social power. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press; 1959. p. 150-67.
22. Hood C. The tools of government. Chatham: Chatham House Publishers; 1986.
23. Lundquist, L. Implementation steering: an actor-structure approach. Bickley: Chartwell-Bratt: 1987;
24. Anderson, CW. Statecraft: an introduction to political choice and judgement. New York: Wiley: 1977;
25. Baldwin DA. Economic statecraft. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press: 1985.
26. Howlett M. Managing the hollow state: procedural policy instruments and modern governance. Canadian Public Administration 2000;43(4):412-31;
27. Rothmayr C, Serduelt U, Maurer E. Policy instruments: an analytical category revised. Bern: Paper Presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, 27th February-March 4, 1997;
28. Timmermans A et al. The design of policy instruments: perspectives and concepts. Chicago: Midwest Political Science Association; 1998.
29. Gunningham N, Sinclair D. Regulatory pluralism: designing policy mixes for environmental protection. Law and Policy. 1999;21(1):49-76;
30. Harter PJ, Eads GC. Policy instruments, institutions and objectives: an analytical framework for assessing alternatives to regulation. Administrative Law Review 1985;37:221-58;
31. Grabosky P. Counterproductive Regulation. International Journal of the Sociology of Law 1995;23:347-69;
32. Sterner T. Policy instruments for environmental and natural resource management. Washington, DC: Resource for the Future Press: 2003.
33. Gunningham N, Young MD. Toward optimal environmental policy: the case of biodiversity conservation. Ecology Law Quarterly 1997;24:243-98;
34. Sinclair D. Self-regulation versus command and control? beyond false dichotomies. Law and Policy 1997;19(4):529-59.
35. Linder SH, Peters BG. The logic of public policy design: linking policy actors and plausible instruments. Knowledge in Society 1991;4:125-51.
36. Grabosky PN. Green markets: environmental regulation by the private sector. Law and Policy 1994;16(4):419-48;
37. Gunningham N, Young MD. Toward optimal environmental policy: the case of biodiversity conservation. Ecology Law Quarterly 1997;24:243-98.
38. Gunningham N, Grabosky P, Sinclair D. Smart regulation: designing environmental policy. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1998. p. 10.
39. Gunningham N, Sinclair D. Leaders and laggards: next generation environmental regulation. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing; 2002.
40. British Columbia, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Aquaculture Legislation in British Columbia: a comparative legal analysis. Aquaculture Industry Development Report 91-01. Victoria, 1991;19-21.
41. Maurice M, Foster ME, Chiasson PY. The economic value of marine-related resources in New Brunswick (Fredericton: New Brunswick Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture and DFO; May 2000.
42. Fisheries and aquaculture New Brunswick. Annual Report 1998-1999; Fredericton: Communications New Brunswick, 1999.
43. Klijn EH. Analyzing and managing policy processes in complex networks: a theoretical examination of the concept policy network and its problems. Administration and Society 1996;28(1):90-119;
44. de Bruijn JA, ten Heuvelhof EF. Policy networks and governance. In: Weimer DL, editor. Institutional design, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 1995. pp. 161-79;
45. de Bruijn JA, ten Heuvelhof EF. Instruments for network management. In: Kickert WJM, Klijn E-H, Koppenjan JFM, editors. Managing complex networks: strategies for the public sector. London: Sage: 1997. pp. 119-36.
46. British Columbia, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Proceedings of the 1990 Manila Clam Workshop. Aquaculture Industry Development Report, 90-09, Victoria, 1990. p. 2-3.
47. New Brunswick Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Annual Report 2001-2002, Fredericton, N.B. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Aquaculture, 2002.
48. http://www.gov.ns.ca/nsaf/aquaculture/nsadc/index.htm.
49. http://www.gov.ns.ca/nsaf/aquaculture/radac/index.htm.
50. Bohm P, Russell CS. Comparative analysis of alternative policy instruments. In: Kneese AV, Sweeney JL, editors. Handbook of natural resource and energy economics, vol. 1. Dordrecht: Elsevier: 1985.
51. Gunningham N, Rees J. Industry self-regulation: an institutional perspective. Law and Policy 1997;19(4):363-414;
52. Grabosky PN. Using non-governmental resources to foster regulatory compliance. Governance 1995;8(4):527-50;
53. Grabosky PN. Regulation by reward: on the use of incentives as regulatory instruments. Law and Policy 1995;17(3):257-82.
54. Gunningham N, Sinclair D. Leaders and laggards: next generation environmental regulation. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing; 2002.
55. Alshuwaikhat HM, Nkwenti DI. Visualizing decisionmaking: perspectives on collaborative and participative approach to sustainable urban planning and management. Environment and Planning B; Planning and Design 2002;29:513-31.
56. Burton TL. A review and analysis of Canadian cases in public participation. In: Sadler B, editor. Involvement and Environment: Proceedings of the Canadian Conference on Public Participation. Edmonton: Environment Council of Alberta: 1978;
57. Bruton J, Michael H. Differences of opinion: round tables, policy networks and the failure of Canadian environmental strategy. Alternatives 1992;19(1):25;
58. Palerm JR. An empirical-theoretical analysis framework for public participation in environmental impact assessment. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2000;43(5):581-600;
59. British Columbia. Baynes sound shellfish aquaculture action plan-draft. Victoria: Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management, Resource Management Division: 2002.
60. Canada. Canada's oceans strategy: our oceans, our future-policy and operational framework for integrated management of estuarine, coastal and marine environments in Canada. Ottawa: Ministry of Fisheries and Oceans: 2002;
61. Canada. Canada's oceans strategy: our oceans, our future. Ottawa: Ministry of Fisheries and Oceans: undated.
62. Suryanata K, Umemoto KN. Tension at the nexus of the global and the local: culture, property and marine aquaculture in Hawai. Environment and Planning A 2003;35(2):199-213;
63. Gunningham N, Sinclair D. Leaders and laggards: next generation environmental regulation. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing: 2002.
64. Yandle T. The challenge of building successful stakeholder organizations: New Zealand's experience in developing a fisheries co-management regime. Marine Policy 2003;27(2):179-92.
65. Tang H et al. Building local program evaluation capacity toward a comprehensive evaluation. In: Mohan R, Bernstein DJ, Whitsett MD, editors. Responding to sponsors and stakeholders in complex evaluation environments. New Directions for Evaluation 2002;95:39-56;
66. Hogl K. Patterns of multi-level co-ordination for NFP-processes: learning from problems and success stories of European policy-making. Forest Policy and Economics 2002;4:301-12;
67. Bryson JM, Cunningham GI, Lakkemoe KJ. What to do when stakeholders matter: the case of problem formulation for the African American men project of Hennepin County, Minnesota. Public Administration Review 2002;62(5):568-84;
68. Leach WD, Pelkey NW, Sabatier PA. Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 2002;21(4):645-670;
69. Vigoda E. From responsiveness to collaboration: governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Public Administration Review 2002;62(5):527-40.
70. Mason M. Evaluating participative capacity-building in environmental policy: provincial fish protection and parks management in British Columbia, Canada. Policy Studies 2000; 21(2):77-98.
71. Allen C. They just don't live and breathe the policy like we do: policy intentions and practice dilemmas in modern social policy and implementation networks. Policy Studies 2001;22(3/4):149-66 at p. 164.