Procedural Justice and Psychological Effects of Criminal Proceedings: The Moderating Effect of Offense Type

Social Justice Research

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 390-405

  Laxminarayan, Malini ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Procedural justice; Secondary victimization; Sexual assault; Victims

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869494219     PISSN: 08857466     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11211-012-0167-6     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interaction effects. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Baker, A. L., & Peterson, C. (1977). Self-blame by rape victims as a function of the rape's consequences: An attributional analysis. Crisis Intervention, 8(3), 92-104.
3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4. Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In B. Sheppard (Ed.), Research on negotiation in organizations (pp. 43-55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
5. Brandl, S. G., & Horvath, F. (1991). Crime victim evaluation of police investigative performance. Journal of Criminal Justice, 19, 293-305.
6. Burgess, A. W., & Holmstrom, L. L. (1976). Rape trauma syndrome. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 131(9), 981-986.
7. Buzawa, E. S., & Austin, T. (1993). Determining police response to domestic violence victims: The role of victim preference. American Behavioral Scientist, 36, 610-623.
8. Campbell, R., Ahrens, C. E., Sefl, T., Wasco, S. M., & Barnes, H. E. (2001). Social reactions to rape victims: Healing and hurtful effects on psychological and physical health outcomes. Violence and Victims, 16(3), 287-302.
9. Campbell, R., & Raja, S. (1999). Secondary victimization of rape victims: Insights from mental health professionals who treat survivors of violence. Violence and Victims, 14(3), 261-275.
10. Campbell, R., & Raja, S. (2005). The sexual assault and secondary victimization of female veterans: Help-seeking experiences with military and civilian social systems. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 97-106.
11. Chandek, M. S., & Porter, C. O. L. H. (1998). The efficacy of expectancy disconfirmation in explaining crime victim satisfaction with the police. Police Quarterly, 1, 21-40.
12. Clark, H. (2010). "What is the justice system willing to offer?" Understanding sexual assault victim/survivors' criminal justice needs. Family Law Matter, 85, 28-37.
13. Cluss, P. A., Boughton, I., Frank, E., Stewant, B. D., & West, D. (1983). The rape victim: Psychological correlates of participation in the legal process. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 10, 342-357.
14. Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386-400.
15. Emm, D., & McKenry, P. C. (1988). Coping with victimization: The impact on rape of female survivors, male significant others and parents. Contemporary Family Therapy, 10(4), 272-279.
16. Erez, E. (1990). Victim participation in sentencing: Rhetoric and reality. Journal of Criminal Justice, 18, 19-31.
17. Gramatikov, M., Barendrecht, M., Laxminarayan, M., Verdonschot, J., Klaming, L., & van Zeeland, C. (2010). A handbook for measuring the costs and quality of access to justice. Apeldoorn: Maklu.
18. Groenhuijsen, M. S. (2005). International protocols on victims' rights and some reflections on significant recent developments in victimology. In R. Snyman & L. Davis (Eds.), Victimology in South Africa (pp. 333-351). Pretoria: van Schaik Publishers.
19. Henry, P. J. (2011). The role of group-based status in job satisfaction: Workplace respect matters more for the stigmatized. Social Justice Research, 24, 231-238.
20. Herman, J. L. (2003). The mental health of crime victims: Impact of legal intervention. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16(2), 159-166.
21. Herman, J. L. (2005). Justice from the victim's perspective. Violence Against Women, 11(5), 571-602.
22. Holmstrom, L. L., & Burgess, A. W. (1991). The victim of rape. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
23. Huo, Y. J., Binning, K. R., & Molina, L. E. (2010). Testing an integrative model of respect: Implications for social engagement and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(2), 200-212.
24. Larcombe, W. (2002). The 'ideal' victim v successful rape complainants: Not what you might expect. Feminist Legal Studies, 10, 131-148.
25. Leventhal, G. S. (1976). What should be done with equity theory? In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum Press.
26. Levine, M. (1974). Scientific method and the adversary model: Some preliminary thoughts. American Psychologist, 29, 661-677.
27. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
28. Matoesian, G. M. (1993). Reproducing rape: Domination through talk in the courtroom. Cambridge: Polity Press.
29. Montada, L. (1994). Injustice in harm and loss. Social Justice Research, 7, 5-28.
30. Murphy, K. R., & Davidshofer, C. O. (2001). Psychological testing: Principals and applications (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
31. Orth, U. (2002). Secondary victimization of crime victims by criminal proceedings. Social Justice Research, 15(4), 313-325.
32. Orth, U. (2003). Punishment goals of crime victims. Law and Human Behavior, 27(2), 173-186.
33. Parsons, J., & Bergin, T. (2010). The impact of criminal justice involvement on victims' mental health. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 23(2), 182-188.
34. Rothbaum, B. O., Foa, E. B., Riggs, D. S., Murdock, T., & Walsh, W. (1992). A prospective examination of posttraumatic stress disorder in rape victims. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 5(3), 455-475.
35. Shapland, J., Duff, P., & Willmore, J. (1985). Victims in the criminal justice system. Aldershot: Gower.
36. Skogan, W. G., Davis, R. C., & Lurigio, A. J. (1990). Victims' needs and victim services: Final Report to the National Institute of Justice.
37. Strang, H. (2002). Repair or revenge: Victims and restorative justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38. Suarez, E., & Gadalla, T. M. (2010). Stop blaming the victim: A meta-analysis on rape myths. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(11), 2010-2035.
39. Sweeney, P. D., & McFarlin, D. B. (1997). Process and outcome: Gender differences in the assessment of justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 83-98.
40. Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Tyler, T. R., Degoey, R., & Smith, H. (1996). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 913-930.
42. Ullman, S. E. (2010). Talking about sexual assault: Society's response to survivors. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
43. Wemmers, J. M., van der Leeden, R., & Steensma, H. (1995). What is procedural justice: Criteria used by Dutch victims to assess the fairness of criminal justice procedures. Social Justice Research, 8(4), 329-350.
44. Williams, J. E. (1984). Secondary victimization: Confronting public attitudes about rape. Victimology, 9(1), 66-81.
45. Young, A. (1998). The wasteland of the law, the worldless song of the rape victim. Melbourne University Law Review, 22, 442-465.