Registration of prostate histology images to ex vivo MR images via strand-shaped fiducials

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1402-1412

  Gibson, Eli ^a   Crukley, Cathie ^a,b   Gaed, Mena ^a,b   Gõmez, José A ^c   Moussa, Madeleine ^c   Chin, Joseph L ^c   Bauman, Glenn S ^b,c   Fenster, Aaron ^a,b,c   Ward, Aaron D ^b,c,d  

^a ROBARTS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b LAWSON HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^d London Regional Cancer Centre   (Canada)

Author keywords

correlative pathology; digital histopathology; ex vivo MRI; prostate cancer; registration; validation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FIDUCIAL MARKER; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE; PROSTATECTOMY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; BIOPSY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FIDUCIAL MARKERS; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PROSTATE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84869463895     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23767     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Mazaheri Y, Bokacheva L, Kroon D-J, et al. Semi-automatic deformable registration of prostate MR images to pathological slices. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 32: 1149-1157.
2. Itou Y, Nakanishi K, Narumi Y, Nishizawa Y, Tsukuma H,. Clinical utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in patients with prostate cancer: can ADC values contribute to assess the aggressiveness of prostate cancer? J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 33: 167-172.
3. Verma S, Rajesh A, Morales H, et al. Assessment of aggressiveness of prostate cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with histologic grade after radical prostatectomy. Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196: 374-381.
4. Kuenen MPJ, Mischi M, Wijkstra H,. Contrast-ultrasound diffusion imaging for localization of prostate cancer. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2011; 30: 1493-1502.
5. Jager G, Ruijter E, van de Kaa C, et al. Local staging of prostate cancer with endorectal MR imaging: correlation with histopathology. Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166: 845-852.
6. Chen LH, Ho H, Lazaro R, et al. Optimum slicing of radical prostatectomy specimens for correlation between histopathology and medical images. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2010; 5: 471-487.
7. Ward A, Crukley C, McKenzie C, et al. Registration of in vivo prostate magnetic resonance images to digital histopathology images. Prostate Cancer Imaging Workshop, MICCAI, September 24, 2010, Beijing. In:, Madabhushi A, Dowling J, Yan P, Fenster A, Abolmaesumi P, Hata N, editors. Prostate cancer imaging. Computer-aided diagnosis, prognosis, and intervention. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6367. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 2010. p 66-76.
8. Ward AD, Crukley C, McKenzie C, et al. Registration of prostate digital histopathology images to in vivo MRI acquired using an endorectal receive coil. Radiology 2012; 263: 856-864.
9. Breen M, Lazebnik R, Wilson D,. Three-dimensional registration of magnetic resonance image data to histological sections with model-based evaluation. Ann Biomed Eng 2005; 33: 1100-1112.
10. Langer DL, van der Kwast TH, Evans AJ, et al. Prostate tissue composition and MR measurements: investigating the relationships between ADC, T2, K(trans), v(e), and corresponding histologic features. Radiology 2010; 255: 485-494.
11. Shah V, Pohida T, Turkbey B, et al. A method for correlating in vivo prostate magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology using individualized magnetic resonance-based molds. Rev Sci Instrum 2009; 80: 104301-104306.
12. Drew B, Jones EC, Reinsberg S, Yung AC, Goldenberg SL, Kozlowski P,. Device for sectioning prostatectomy specimens to facilitate comparison between histology and in vivo MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 32: 992-996.
13. Madabhushi A, Feldman MD, Metaxas DN, Tomaszeweski J, Chute D,. Automated detection of prostatic adenocarcinoma from high-resolution ex vivo MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005; 24: 1611-1625.
14. Groenendaal G, Moman MR, Korporaal JG, et al. Validation of functional imaging with pathology for tumor delineation in the prostate. Radiother Oncol 2010; 94: 145-150.
15. Jackson AS, Reinsberg SA, Sohaib SA, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for prostate cancer localization. Br J Radiol 2009; 82: 148-156.
16. Taylor LS, Porter BC, Nadasdy G, et al. Three-dimensional registration of prostate images from histology and ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004; 30: 161-168.
17. Park H, Piert MR, Khan A, et al. Registration methodology for histological sections and in vivo imaging of human prostate. Acad Radiol 2008; 15: 1027-1039.
18. Bardinet E, Ourselin S, Dormont D, et al. Co-registration of histological, optical and MR data of the human brain. MICCAI, September 25-28, 2002, Tokyo. In:, Dohi T, Kikinis R, editors. MICCAI '02 Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention-Part I. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2489. London: Springer; 2002. p 548-555.
19. Kim B, Boes JL, Frey KA, Meyer CR,. Mutual information for automated unwarping of rat brain autoradiographs. Neuroimage 1997; 5: 31-40.
20. Meyer C, Moffat B, Kuszpit K, et al. A methodology for registration of a histological slide and in vivo MRI volume based on optimizing mutual information. Mol Imaging 2006; 5: 16-23.
21. Xu J, Humphrey PA, Kibel AS, et al. Magnetic resonance diffusion characteristics of histologically defined prostate cancer in humans. Magn Reson Med 2009; 61: 842-850.
22. Gibson E, Crukley C, Gõmez JA, et al. Tissue block MRI for slice orientation-independent registration of digital histology images to ex vivo MRI of the prostate. International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, IEEE, March 30 to April 2, 2011, Chicago. p 566-569.
23. Zhan Y, Ou Y, Feldman M, Tomaszeweski J, Davatzikos C, Shen D,. Registering histologic and MR images of prostate for image-based cancer detection. Acad Radiol 2007; 14: 1367-1381.
24. Chappelow J, Bloch BN, Rofsky N, et al. Elastic registration of multimodal prostate MRI and histology via multiattribute combined mutual information. Med Phys 2011; 38: 2005-2018.
25. Ou Y, Dinggang S, Feldman M, Tomaszewski J, Davatzikos C,. Non-rigid registration between histological and MR images of the prostate: a joint segmentation and registration framework. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop, IEEE Computer Society, June 20-25, 2009, Miami. p 125-132.
26. Gibson E, Crukley C, Gõmez JA, et al. Validation of direct registration of whole-mount prostate digital histopathology to ex vivo MR images. Prostate Cancer Imaging Workshop, MICCAI, September 22, 2011, Toronto. In:, Madabhushi A, Dowling J, Huisman H, Barratt D, editors. Prostate cancer imaging. Image analysis and image-guided interventions. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6963. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 2011. p 134-145.
27. Lagarias JC, Reeds JA, Wright MH, Wright PE,. Convergence Properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions. SIAM J Optimiz 1998; 9: 112-147.
28. Fitzpatrick JM, West JB, Maurer CR,. Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998; 17: 694-702.
29. Turnbull LW, Buckley DL, Turnbull LS, Liney GP, Knowles AJ,. Differentiation of prostatic carcinoma and benign prostatic hyperplasia: correlation between dynamic Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging and histopathology. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 9: 311-316.
30. Engelbrecht MR, Huisman HJ, Laheij RJF, et al. Discrimination of prostate cancer from normal peripheral zone and central gland tissue by using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2003; 229: 248-254.
31. Rouvière O, Raudrant A, Ecochard R, et al. Characterization of time-enhancement curves of benign and malignant prostate tissue at dynamic MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 931-942.
32. Kimm SY, Lee JH, Nishimura DG, et al. MR-histology correlation in ex-vivo human prostate specimens. In: Proc 17th Annual Meeting ISMRM, Honolulu; 2009 (abstract 2241).
33. Epstein JI, Sanderson H, Carter HB, Scharfstein DO,. Utility of saturation biopsy to predict insignificant cancer at radical prostatectomy. Urology 2005; 66: 356-360.
34. Stamey TA, Freiha FS, McNeal JE, Redwine EA, Whittemore AS, Schmid HP,. Localized prostate cancer. Relationship of tumor volume to clinical significance for treatment of prostate cancer. Cancer 1993; 71: 933-938.