Prostate: Registration of digital histopathologic images to in vivo MR images acquired by using endorectal receive coil

Radiology

Volumn 263, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 856-864

  Ward, Aaron D ^a   Crukley, Cathie ^b   McKenzie, Charles A ^c   Montreuil, Jacques ^a   Gibson, Eli ^a   Romagnoli, Cesare ^d   Gomez, Jose A ^c   Moussa, Madeleine ^c   Chin, Joseph ^c   Bauman, Glenn ^c   Fenster, Aaron ^a  

^a ROBARTS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b LAWSON HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^d LONDON HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ENDORECTAL RECEIVE COIL; EX VIVO STUDY; FIDUCIAL MARKER; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE REGISTRATION; IMAGE SLICING ERROR; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; RADIATION EQUIPMENT; TISSUE SLICE;

CONTRAST MEDIA; FIDUCIAL MARKERS; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, INTERVENTIONAL; MALE; PROSTATE; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84862505075     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12102294     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. LaSpina M, Haas GP. Update on the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer. Can J Urol 2008;15(Suppl 1):3-13; discussion 13.
2. Falzarano S, Magi-Galluzzi C. Staging prostate cancer and its relationship to prognosis. Diagn Histopathol 2010;16(9):432-438.
3. Epstein JI, Partin AW, Sauvageot J, Walsh PC. Prediction of progression following radical prostatectomy: a multivariate analysis of 721 men with long-term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol 1996;20(3):286-292. (Pubitemid 26071509)
4. Welch HG, Black WC. Overdiagnosis in cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102(9):605-613.
5. Ahmed HU, Kirkham A, Arya M, et al. Is it time to consider a role for MRI before prostate biopsy? Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2009;6(4):197-206.
6. Bax J, Cool D, Gardi L, et al. Mechanically assisted 3D ultrasound guided prostate biopsy system. Med Phys 2008;35(12):5397-5410.
7. Krieger A, Susil RC, Ménard C, et al. Design of a novel MRI compatible manipulator for image guided prostate interventions. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2005;52(2):306-313. (Pubitemid 40188679)
8. Marks L, Ward AD, Gardi L, et al. Tracking of prostate biopsy sites using a 3D ultrasound device (Artemis). J Urol 2010;183(4)Suppl:e832.
9. Cool D, Sherebrin S, Izawa J, Chin J, Fenster A. Design and evaluation of a 3D transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy system. Med Phys 2008;35(10):4695-4707.
10. van Lin EN, Fütterer JJ, Heijmink SW, et al. IMRT boost dose planning on dominant intraprostatic lesions: gold marker-based three-dimensional fusion of CT with dynamic contrast-enhanced and 1H-spectroscopic MRI. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;65(1):291-303.
11. Pinkawa M, Attieh C, Piroth MD, et al. Dose-escalation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: evaluation of the dose distribution with and without 18F-choline PET-CT detected simultaneous integrated boost. Radiother Oncol 2009;93(2):213-219.
12. Epstein JI, Sanderson H, Carter HB, Scharfstein DO. Utility of saturation biopsy to predict insignificant cancer at radical prostatectomy. Urology 2005;66(2):356-360. (Pubitemid 41138097)
13. Schned AR, Wheeler KJ, Hodorowski CA, et al. Tissue-shrinkage correction factor in the calculation of prostate cancer volume. Am J Surg Pathol 1996;20(12):1501-1506. (Pubitemid 26411718)
14. Jager GJ, Ruijter ET, van de Kaa CA, et al. Local staging of prostate cancer with endorectal MR imaging: correlation with histopathology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166(4):845-852. (Pubitemid 26102064)
15. Chen LH, Ho H, Lazaro R, et al. Optimum slicing of radical prostatectomy specimens for correlation between histopathology and medical images. Int J CARS 2010;5(5):471-487.
16. Langer DL, van der Kwast TH, Evans AJ, et al. Prostate tissue composition and MR measurements: investigating the relationships between ADC, T2, K(trans), v(e), and corresponding histologic features. Radiology 2010;255(2):485-494.
17. Shah V, Pohida T, Turkbey B, et al. A method for correlating in vivo prostate magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology using individualized magnetic resonance-based molds. Rev Sci Instrum 2009;80(10):104301.
18. Groenendaal G, Moman MR, Korporaal JG, et al. Validation of functional imaging with pathology for tumor delineation in the prostate. Radiother Oncol 2010;94(2):145-150.
19. Rouvière O, Reynolds C, Hulshizer T, et al. MR histological correlation: a method for cutting specimens along the imaging plane in animal or ex vivo experiments. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;23(1):60-69. (Pubitemid 43100719)
20. Rosen Y, Bloch BN, Lenkinski RE, Greenman RL, Marquis RP, Rofsky NM. 3T MR of the prostate: reducing susceptibility gradients by inflating the endorectal coil with a barium sulfate suspension. Magn Reson Med 2007;57(5):898-904. (Pubitemid 46709410)
21. Ourselin S, Roche A, Prima S, Ayache N. Block matching: a general framework to improve robustness of rigid registration of medical images. Third International Conference on Medical Robotics, Imaging and Computer Assisted Surgery (MICCAI 2000) 1935 (2000); 557-566.
22. Wells WM 3rd, Viola P, Atsumi H, Nakajima S, Kikinis R. Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information. Med Image Anal 1996;1(1):35-51. (Pubitemid 126421955)
23. Arun KS, Huang TS, Blostein SD. Least-squares fitting of two 3-d point sets. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1987;9(5):698-700.
24. Gibson E, Fenster A, Crukley C, et al. Image-guided prostate sectioning supporting registration of graded cancerous foci from digital histopathology images to in vivo MRI: an interactive 3D visualization tool. Proceedings of SPIE: medical imaging 2011. Bellingham, Wash: International Society for Optical Engineering, 2011.
25. Bookstein FL. Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1989;11(6):567-585.
26. Fitzpatrick JM, West JB, Maurer CR Jr. Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998;17(5):694-702. (Pubitemid 128747725)
27. Ward AD, Crukley C, McKenzie C, et al. Registration of in vivo prostate magnetic resonance images to digital histopathology images. Lecture notes in computer science, prostate cancer imaging, computer-aided diagnosis, prognosis, and intervention: medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention (MICCAI) 6367, 66-76, 2010.