Magnetic resonance diffusion characteristics of histologically defined prostate cancer in humans

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 842-850

  Xu, Junqian ^a   Humphrey, Peter A ^a   Kibel, Adam S ^a,b,c   Snyder, Abraham Z ^a,b   Narra, Vamsidhar R ^a   Ackerman, Joseph J H ^a,b,c   Song, Sheng Kwei ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c USA   (United States)

Author keywords

Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC); Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI); Fractional anisotropy (FA); Prostate carcinoma (PCa)

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; CALCIUM COMPOUNDS; CLUSTERING ALGORITHMS; DISEASES; HISTOLOGY; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SURFACE DIFFUSION; TENSORS; TISSUE; UROLOGY;

APPARENT DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA; DIFFUSION CHARACTERISTICS; FRACTIONAL ANISOTROPY; HUMAN PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE CARCINOMA; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; TISSUE CLASSIFICATION;

DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING;

ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER TISSUE; CONTRAST; DIFFUSION; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; EX VIVO STUDY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGING AND DISPLAY; IN VIVO STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; TUMOR LOCALIZATION;

EID: 66249118987     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21896     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Jemal A. Slegel R. Ward E. Murray T. Xu J. Sraigal C. Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2006, CA Cancer J Clin 2008;56:106-130
2. Kantoff P. W. Rarroll P. R. D'Amico A. V. editors. Prostate cancer; principles and practice. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2002:278-280.
3. Keetcli D. W. Catalona WJ. Smith D. S. Serial prostatic biopsies in men with persistently elevated serum prostate specific antigen values. J Urol 1994:151:1571-1574.
4. Katz A. E. Rewcastle JC. The current and potential role of cryoablation as a primary therapy for localized prostate cancer, Cnrr Oncol Rep 2003; 5:231-238.
5. Guckenberger M. Flentje M. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (TMRT) of localized prostate cancer: a review and future perspectives, Strahlenther Onkol 2007;183:57-62.
6. Cesaretti J. A. Stone N. N. Skouteris V. M. Park J. L. Stock RG. Brachytherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer. Cancer J 2007:13:302-312
7. Rouviere O. Souchon R. Salomir R. Gelet A. Chapelon J. Y. Lyonnet D. Transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of prostate cancer: effective treatment requiring accurate imaging, Eur J Radiol 2007:63:317-327
8. Coakley F. V. Qayyum A. Kurhanewicz J. Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopic imaging of prostate cancer. J Urol 2003;170:S69-S75; discussion S75-S66
9. Kurhanewicz J. Swanson M. G. Nelson S. J. Vigneron D. B. Combined magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopic imaging approach to molecular imaging of prostate cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:451-463.
10. Padhani A. R. Capitis ki C. J. Macvicar D. A. Parker C. J. Suckling J. Revell P. B. Leach M. O. Dearnaley D. P. Husband J. E. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: correlation with morphology and tumour stage, histological grade and PSA. Clin Radiol 2000;55:99-109
11. Engelbrecht M. R. Huisman Hj, Laheij R. J. Jager G. J. van Leenders G. J. Hulsbergen-Van De Kaa C. A. de la Rosette J. J. Blickman J. G. Barentsz JO. Discrimination of prostate cancer from normal peripheral zone and central gland tissue by using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2003:229:248-254.
12. Basser P. J. Pierpaoli C. Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quaiitilalive-diffusion-lensor MRI. J Magn Reson B 1998;111:209-219
13. Song S. K. Qu Z. Garabedian E. M. Gordon JL Milbrandt J. Ackerman JJ. Improved magnetic resonance imaging detection of prostate cancer in a transgenic mouse model. Cancer Res 2002;62:1555-1558.
14. Gibbs P. Tozer DJ. Liney G. P. Tumbull LW. Comparison of quantitative T2 mapping and diffusion-weighted imaging in the normal and pathologic prostate, Magn Reson Med 2001;46:1054-1050.
15. Issa B. In vivo measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient In normal and malignant prostatic tissues using echo-planar imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:196-200.
16. Chan I. Wells W III, Mulkern R. V. Haker S. Zhang J. Zou K. H. Maier S. E. Tempany CM. Detection of prostate cancer by integration of line-scan diffusion, T2-mapping and T2-weighted magnetic resonance Imaging; a multichannel statistical classifier. Med Phys 2003; 30:2390-2398.
17. Hosseinzadeh K. Schwarz SD. Endorectal diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer to differentiate malignant and benign peripheral zone tissue. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:654.
18. Sato C. Naganawa S. Nakamura T. Kurnada H. Miura S. Takizawa O. Ishigaki T. Differentiation of noncancerous tissue and cancer lesions by apparent diffusion coefficient values in transition and peripheral zones of the prostate. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;21:258-282
19. Pickles M. D. Gibbs P. Sreenivas M. Tumbull L. W. Diffusion-weighted imaging of normal and malignant prostate tissue at 3.0T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;23:130-134.
20. Kozlowski P. Chang S. D. Jones E. C. Berean K. W. Chen H. Coldenberg SL. Combined diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis-correlation with biopsy and histopathology. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;4124:108-113.
21. Gibbs P. Pickles M. D. Tumbull L. W. Diffusion imaging of the prostate at 3.0 tesla. Invest Radiol 2006;41:185-188.
22. Griswold M. A. Jakob P. M. Heidemann K. M. Nittka M. Jellus V. Wang J. Kiefer B. Haase A. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002;47:1202-1210
23. Hasan K. M. Parker D. L. Alexander A. L. Comparison of gradient encoding schemes for diffusion-tensor MRI. JMagnReson Imaging 2001;13:769-780.
24. Shimony J. S. Burton H. Epstein A. A. McLaren D. G. Sun S. W. Snyder AZ. Diffusion tensor Imaging reveals white matter reorganization in early blind humans. Cereb Cortex 2006;4116:1653-1881.
25. Stejskal E. G. Tanner JE. Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient, J Chem Phys 1965;42: 288-292.
26. Humphrey P. A. Vollmer R. T. Intraglandular tumor extent and prognosis in prostatic carcinoma: application of a grid method to prostatectomy specimens. Hum Pathol 1990:21:799-804.
27. Xu J. Humphrey P. A. Kibel A. S. Snyder A. Z. Narra V. R. Song SK. ADC Decrease in histology Identified prostate cancer. In: Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Berlin, Germany, 2007, p. 3668
28. Budde M. D. Kirn J. H. Liang H. F. Schmidt R. E. Russell J. H. Gross A. H. Song SK. Toward accurate diagnosis of white matter pathology using diffusion tensor imaging, Magn Reson Med 2007;57:688-695.
29. Williams MC. Does M. D. Price R. R. ADC mapping of whole excised human prosta te. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Kyoto, Japan, 2004. p. 2084.
30. Quint L. E. Van Erp JS. Bland PIT Del Buono E. A. Mandell S. H. Grossman H. B. Gikas PW. Prostate cancer: correlation of MR images with tissue optical density at pathologic examination. Radiology 1991;179:837-842.
31. Liney GP. Turnhull L. W. Lowry M. Turnbull L. S. Knowles AJ. Horsman A. In vivo quantificatian of citrate concentration and water T2 relaxation time of the pathologic prostate gland using 1H MRS and MRI Magn Reson Imaging 1997;15:61177-1186.
32. Chen A. P. Xu D. Henry R. Qayyum A. Kurhanewicz J. Vigneron DB. Diffusion tensor imaging of the prostate following therapy. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2003. p. 579.
33. Vigneron D. B. Xu D. Chen A. P. Swanson M. G. Kurhanewicz J. Diffusion tensor Imaging of the prostate using single-shot fast spin echo. In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 2002, p, 457
34. Sinha S. Sinha U. In vivo diffusion tensor imaging of the human prostate. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:530-537.
35. Reinsberg S. A. Brewster J. M. Payne G. S. Leach M. O. deSouza NM. Anisotropic diffusion in prostate cancer: fact or artefact? In: Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Miami Beach. Florida, USA, 2005. p. 269.
36. Haker S. J. Szot Barnes A. Maier S. E. Tompany C. M. Mulkern RV. Diffusion tensor imaging for prostate cancer detection: preliminary results from a biopsy-based assessment. In: Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Miami Beach, Florida, USA, 2005. p. 2126
37. Roebuck J. R. Haker S. J. Tempany C. M. Rybicki F. J. Maier S. E. Mulkern RV. Diffusion tensor imaging of the prostate: low anisotropics in central gland and peripheral zone in men with adenocarcinoma. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Seattle, Washington, USA, 2006. p. 3338
38. Meyer C. R. Moffat B. A. Kuszpit K. K. Bland P. L. McKeever P. E. Johnson T. D. Chenevert T. L. Rehemtulla A. Ross BD. A methodology for registration of a histological slide and in vivo MRI volume based on optimizing mutual information. Mol Imaging 2006;5:16-23.