Exploring the relationships between patient characteristics and their dialysis care experience

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Volumn 27, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 4188-4196

  Van Der Veer, Sabine N ^a   Arah, Onyebuchi A ^a,b,c   Visserman, Ella ^d,e   Bart, Hans A J ^d   De Keizer, Nicolette F ^a   Abu Hanna, Ameen ^a   Heuveling, Lara M ^f   Stronks, Karien ^a   Jager, Kitty J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d Dutch Kidney patient Association (NVN)   (Netherlands)

^e Bureau Blaauwbroek voor Vraaggestuurde Zorg   (Netherlands)

^f Hans Mak Institute   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

case mix adjustment; health care outcome assessment; health care quality indicators; patient satisfaction; renal dialysis

Indexed keywords

ALBUMIN;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ALBUMIN BLOOD LEVEL; ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; DIALYSIS; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HEART INFARCTION; HEMODIALYSIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL HISTORY; NEPHROLOGIST; NURSE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL STATUS;

AGED; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RENAL DIALYSIS;

EID: 84869421966     PISSN: 09310509     EISSN: 14602385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfs351     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Blumenthal D. Part 1: quality of care-what is it? N Engl J Med 1996; 335:891-894.
2. Improving the 21st-century health care system, chap. 2. In: Institute of Medicine (ed.). Crossing the Quality Chasm. A New Health System for the 21st Century, 6th edn. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 2005, pp 39-60.
3. Davies E, Shaller D, Edgman-Levitan S et al. Evaluating the use of a modified CAHPS survey to support improvements in patient-centred care: lessons from a quality improvement collaborative. Health Expect 2008; 11:160-176. (Pubitemid 351724999)
4. Crow R, Gage H, Hampson S et al. The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature. Health Technol Assess 2002; 6:1-244.
5. Sixma HJ, Delnoij DM, Stubbe J et al. Handboek CQI Ontwikkeling: richtlijnen en voorschriften voor de ontwikkeling Van een CQI meetinstrument (Manual for development of a CQ Index measurement instrument), 2nd edn. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Centrum Klantervaring Zorg, 2008.
6. Delnoij DM, Rademakers JJ, Groenewegen PP. The Dutch consumer quality index: an example of stakeholder involvement in indicator development. BMC Health Serv Res 2010; 10:88.
7. Van der Veer SN, Jager KJ, Visserman E et al. Development and validation of the consumer quality Index instrument to measure the experience and priority of chronic dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2012; 27:3284-3291.
8. Damman OC, Stubbe JH, Hendriks M et al. Using multilevel modeling to assess case-mix adjusters in consumer experience surveys in health care. Med Care 2009; 47:496-503.
9. O'Malley AJ, Zaslavsky AM, Elliott MN et al. Case-mix adjustment of the CAHPS Hospital Survey. Health Serv Res 2005; 40:2162-2181. (Pubitemid 41814231)
10. Farley DO, Elliott MN, Haviland AM et al. Understanding variations in Medicare Consumer Assessment of Health Care Providers and Systems scores: California as an example. Health Serv Res 2011; 46:1646-1662.
11. Hall JA, Dornan MC. Patient sociodemographic characteristics as predictors of satisfaction with medical care: a meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med 1990; 30:811-818. (Pubitemid 20133350)
12. Cohen G Age and health status in a patient satisfaction survey. Soc Sci Med 1996; 42:1085-1093. (Pubitemid 26109028)
13. Zapka JG, Palmer RH, Hargraves JL et al. Relationships of patient satisfaction with experience of system performance and health status. JAmbul Care Manage 1995; 18:73-83.
14. Linn LS, Greenfield S. Patient suffering and patient satisfaction among the chronically ill. Med Care 1982; 20:425-431. (Pubitemid 12038217)
15. Rubin HR, Fink NE, Plantinga LC et al. Patient ratings of dialysis care with peritoneal dialysis vs haemodialysis. JAMA 2004; 291:697-703. (Pubitemid 38543789)
16. Juergensen E, Wuerth D, Finkelstein SH et al. Haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: patients' assessment of their satisfaction with therapy and the impact of the therapy on their lives. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 1:1191-1196.
17. Prus SG. Comparing social determinants of self-rated health across the United States and Canada. Soc Sci Med 2011; 73:50-59.
18. Dillman DA. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2000.
19. Zeger SL, Liang KY, Albert PS. Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics 1988; 44:1049-1060. (Pubitemid 19026037)
20. Jager KJ, Zoccali C, Macleod A et al. Confounding: what it is and how to deal with it. Kidney Int 2008; 73:256-260.
21. Tripepi G, Jager KJ, Dekker FW et al. Testing for causality and prognosis: etiological and prognostic models. Kidney Int 2008; 74:1512-1515.
22. De Boer D, Delnoij D, Rademakers J. Do patient experiences on priority aspects of health care predict their global rating of quality of care? A study in five patient groups. Health Expect 2010; 13:285-297.
23. Sitzia J, Wood N. Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45:1829-1843. (Pubitemid 27525984)
24. Arah OA, ten Asbroek AH, Delnoij DM et al. Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Hospital-level Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Survey instrument. Health Serv Res 2006; 41:284-301.
25. Zaslavsky AM, Zaborski L, Cleary PD. Does the effect of respondent characteristics on consumer assessments vary across health plans? Med Care Res Rev 2000; 57:379-394. (Pubitemid 30663095)
26. Elliott MN, Swartz R, Adams J et al. Case-mix adjustment of the National CAHPS benchmarking data 1.0: a violation of model assumptions? Health Serv Res 2001; 36:555-573. (Pubitemid 32660572)
27. Agoritsas T, Lubbeke A, Schiesari L et al. Assessment of patients' tendency to give a positive or negative rating to healthcare. Qual Saf Health Care 2009; 18:374-379.
28. Stack AG. Determinants of modality selection among incident US dialysis patients: results from a national study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13:1279-1287. (Pubitemid 34441409)
29. Van de Luijtgaarden MW, Noordzij M, Stel VS et al. Effects of co-morbid and demographic factors on dialysis modality choice and related patient survival in Europe. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011; 26:2940-2947.
30. Arah OA, Roset B, Delnoij DM et al. Associations between technical quality of diabetes care and patient experience. Health Expect, 2011 (Epub ahead of print).
31. Isaac T, Zaslavsky AM, Cleary PD et al. The relationship between patients' perception of care and measures of hospital quality and safety. Health Serv Res 2010; 45:1024-1040.