Development and validation of the Consumer Quality index instrument to measure the experience and priority of chronic dialysis patients

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Volumn 27, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 3284-3291

  Van Der Veer, Sabine N ^a   Jager, Kitty J ^a   Visserman, Ella ^c   Beekman, Robert J ^b   Boeschoten, Els W ^d   De Keizer, Nicolette F ^a   Heuveling, Lara ^d   Stronks, Karien ^a   Arah, Onyebuchi A ^a,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b Dutch Kidney patient Association (NVN)   (Netherlands)

^c Bureau Blaauwbroek voor Vraaggestuurde Zorg   (Netherlands)

^d Hans Mak Institute   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

chronic kidney failure therapy; patient satisfaction; questionnaires; renal dialysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONSUMER QUALITY INDEX; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT; HOME DIALYSIS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; RELIABILITY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HEMODIALYSIS, HOME; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RENAL DIALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84864580597     PISSN: 09310509     EISSN: 14602385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfs023     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Blumenthal D. Part 1: quality of care-what is it? N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 891-894.
2. Improving the 21st-century health care system. In: Institute of Medicine, ed. Crossing the Quality Chasm. A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 2005 pp. 39-60.
3. Kimmel PL. Psychosocial factors in adult end-stage renal disease patients treated with hemodialysis: correlates and outcomes. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 35: S132-S140.
4. Kovac JA, Patel SS, Peterson RA et al. Patient satisfaction with care and behavioral compliance in end-stage renal disease patients treated with hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 39: 1236-1244.
5. Barendse SM, Speight J, Bradley C. The Renal Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (RTSQ): a measure of satisfaction with treatment for chronic kidney failure. Am J Kidney Dis 2005; 45: 572-579.
6. Kirchgessner J, Perera-Chang M, Klinkner G et al. Satisfaction with care in peritoneal dialysis patients. Kidney Int 2006; 70: 1325-1331.
7. De Boer D, Delnoij D, Rademakers J. Do patient experiences on priority aspects of health care predict their global rating of quality of care? A study in five patient groups. Health Expect 2010; 13: 285-297.
8. Sitzia J, Wood N. Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45: 1829-1843.
9. Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) In-center Hemodialysis Survey. www.cahps.ahrq.gov. (21 February 2011, date last accessed).
10. Delnoij DM, Rademakers JJ, Groenewegen PP. The Dutch consumer quality index: an example of stakeholder involvement in indicator development. BMC Health Serv Res 2010; 10: 88.
11. Sixma HJ, Delnoij DM, Stubbe J et al. Handboek CQI Ontwikkeling: richtlijnen en voorschriften voor de ontwikkeling van een CQI meetinstrument (Manual for Development of a CQ Index Measurement Instrument). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Centrum Klantervaring Zorg, 2008.
12. van der Sande FM, Kooman JP, Ikenroth LJ et al. A system of quality management in dialysis. Semin Dial 2003; 16: 453-457.
13. Visserman EA, Stronks K, Boeschoten EWet al. CQ-index Dialyse: Meetinstrumentontwikkeling. Kwaliteit van dialysezorg vanuit patiëntenperspectief (Development of CQ-index for Chronic Dialysis. Quality of Care from the Patient Perspective). Bussum, the Netherlands: Dutch Kidney Patient Association (NVN), 2009.
14. Dillman DA. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2000.
15. Floyd FJ, Widaman KF. Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychol Assess 2005; 7: 286-299.
16. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16: 297-334.
17. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales. A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. 2008. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
18. Sixma HJ, Kerssens JJ, Campen CV et al. Quality of care from the patients' perspective: from theoretical concept to a new measuring instrument. Health Expect 1998; 1: 82-95.
19. Wuerth DB, Finkelstein SH, Kliger AS et al. Patient assessment of quality of care in a chronic peritoneal dialysis facility. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 35: 638-643.
20. Rubin HR, Jenckes M, Fink NE et al. Patient's view of dialysis care: development of a taxonomy and rating of importance of different aspects of care. CHOICE study. Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for ESRD. Am J Kidney Dis 1997; 30: 793-801.
21. Wasserfallen JB, Moinat M, Halabi G et al. Satisfaction of patients on chronic haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Swiss Med Wkly 2006; 136: 210-217.
22. Fadem SZ, Walker DR, Abbott G et al. Satisfaction with renal replacement therapy and education: the american association of kidney patients survey. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2011; 6: 605-612.
23. Arah OA, ten Asbroek AH, Delnoij DM et al. Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Hospital-level Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Survey instrument. Health Serv Res 2006; 41: 284-301.
24. Rubin HR, Fink NE, Plantinga LC et al. Patient ratings of dialysis care with peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis. JAMA 2004; 291: 697-703.
25. Damman OC, Stubbe JH, Hendriks M et al. Using multilevel modeling to assess case-mix adjusters in consumer experience surveys in health care. Med Care 2009; 47: 496-503.
26. Jacobi CE, Boshuizen HC, Rupp I et al. Quality of rheumatoid arthritis care: the patient's perspective. Int J Qual Health Care 2004; 16: 73-81.
27. Agoritsas T, Lubbeke A, Schiesari L et al. Assessment of patients' tendency to give a positive or negative rating to healthcare. Qual Saf Health Care 2009; 18: 374-379