Undergraduate students searching and reading Web sources for writing

Educational Media International

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 201-215

  Li, Yongyan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

undergraduate students; Web based research; write from sources

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869188085     PISSN: 09523987     EISSN: 14695790     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09523987.2012.738013     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abdullah, N. and Gibb, F. 2008a. Students' attitudes towards e-books in a Scottish higher education institution: Part 1. Library Review, 57(8): 593-605.
2. Abdullah, N. and Gibb, F. 2008b. Students' attitudes towards e-books in a Scottish higher education institution: Part 2. Library Review, 57(9): 676-689.
3. Allison, D. and Ip, K.S. 1991. Misreading viewpoints: Reading problems among ESL university students in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching, 14: 33-50.
4. Barber, C.F. 2008. Domestic violence against men. Nursing Standard, 22(51): 35-39.
5. Belcher, D. and Hirvela, A. 2001. Linking literacies: Perspectives on L2 reading-writing connections, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
6. Burton, V.T. and Chadwick, S.A. 2000. Investigating the practices of student researchers: Patterns of use and criteria for use of Internet and library sources. Computers and Composition, 17: 309-328.
7. Carlson, J. 2006. An examination of undergraduate student citation behavior. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(1): 14-22.
8. Carr, N. 2010. The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains, New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
9. Chew, S.C. and Lauderdale, P., eds. 2010. Theory and methodology of world development: The writings of Andre Gunder Frank, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
10. Currie, L., Devlin, F., Emde, J. and Graves, K. 2010. Undergraduate search strategies and evaluation criteria: Searching for credible sources. New Library World, 111(3/4): 113-124.
11. Fleming-May, R. and Yuro, L. 2009. From student to scholar: The academic library and social sciences PhD students' transformation. Libraries and the Academy, 9(2): 199-221.
12. Flower, L., Stein, V., Ackerman, J., Kantz, M.J., McCormick, K. and Peck, W.C., eds. 1990. Reading-to-write: Exploring a cognitive and social process, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
13. Greene, S. 1993. The role of task in the development of academic thinking through reading and writing in a college history course. Research in the Teaching of English, 27: 46-75.
14. Gregory, C.L. 2008. "But I want a real book": An investigation of undergraduates' usage and attitudes toward electronic books. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 47: 266-273.
15. Harwood, N., & Petrić, B. (2011). Performance in the citing behaviour of two successful student writers. Paper to present at the AAAL2011, March 26-29, 2011, Chicago, IL.
16. Head, A.J. (2007). Beyond Google: How do students conduct academic research? First Monday, 12(8). Retrieved fromhttp://firstmonday.org/issues/issue12_8/head/index.html
17. Higgins, L. 1993. "Reading to argue: Helping students transform source texts". In Hearing ourselves think: Cognitive research in the college writing classroom, Edited by: Penrose, A.M. and Sitko, B.M. 70-101. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
18. Hirvela, A. 2005. Computer-based reading and writing across the curriculum: Two case studies of L2 writers. Computers and Composition, 22: 337-356.
19. Johns, A.M. 2006. "Areas of research that influence L2 writing instruction". In Current trends in the development and teaching of the four language skills, Edited by: Uso-Juan, E., Martinez-Flor, A. and Carlos Palmer-Silveira, J. 401-422. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
20. Kuhlthau, C. 1985. Teaching the library research process, New York, NY: Centre for Applied Research in Education.
21. Kuhlthau, C. 2004. Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information services, 2nd ed., Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
22. Kuhlthau, C.C., Heinström, J. & Todd, R.J. (2008). The "information search process" revisited: is the model still useful? Information Research, 13(4) paper 355. Retrieved from http://InformationR.net/ir/13-4/paper355.html
23. Levine-Clark, M. 2006. Electronic book usage: A survey at the University of Denver. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 6: 285-299.
24. Li, Y. and Casanave, C.P. 2012. Two first-year students' strategies for writing from sources: Patchwriting or plagiarism?. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(2): 165-180.
25. McClure, R. and Clink, K. 2009. How do you know that? An investigation of student research practices in the digital age. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 9(1): 115-132.
26. McDowell, L. 2002. Electronic information resources in undergraduate education: An exploratory study of opportunities for student learning and independence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3): 255-266.
27. Nelson, J. 1993. "The library revisited: Exploring students' research processes". In Hearing ourselves think: Cognitive research in the college writing classroom, Edited by: Penrose, A.M. and Sitko, B.M. 102-122. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
28. Nelson, J. and Hayes, J.R. 1988. How the writing context shapes college students' strategies for writing from sources, Berkeley: University of California; Carnegie Mellon University.
29. Nicholas, D., Rowlands, I., Clark, D. and Huntington, P. 2008. UK scholarly e-book usage: A landmark survey. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 60(4): 311-334.
30. Parsons, T. 1964. Evolutionary universals in society. American Sociological Review, 29(3): 339-357.
31. Penrose, A.M. and Sitko, B.M., eds. 1993. Hearing ourselves think: Cognitive research in the college writing classroom, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
32. Radia, P. and Stapleton, P. 2008. Unconventional Internet genres and their impact on second language undergraduate students' writing process. Internet & Higher Education, 11(1): 9-17.
33. Reinking, D. 1987. "Computers, reading, and a new technology of print". In Reading and computers: Issues for theory and practice, Edited by: Reinking, D. 3-23. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
34. Reinking, D., Labbo, L. and McKenna, M. 1997. "Navigating the changing landscape of literacy: Current theory and research in computer-based reading and writing". In Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts, Edited by: Flood, J., Heath, S.B. and Capp, D. 77-92. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
35. Shelburne, W.A. 2009. E-book usage in an academic library: User attitudes and behaviors. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 33: 59-72.
36. Sin, D. (2009, May 25). Non-locals lead way in campus research slots Quota opposed for HK students. South China Morning Post, p. 1.
37. Spivey, N.N. 1990. Transforming texts: Constructive processes in reading and writing. Written Communication, 7(2): 256-287.
38. Stapleton, P. 2010. Writing in an electronic age: A case study of L2 composing processes. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9: 295-307.
39. Stotsky, S. 1990. On planning and writing plans. Or beware of borrowed theories!. College Composition and Communication, 41(1): 37-57.
40. Wang, Y.-M. and Artero, M. 2005. Caught in the Web: University student use of Web resources. Educational Media International, 42(1): 71-82.
41. Wu, M.-D. and Chen, S.-C. 2011. Graduate students' usage of and attitudes towards e-books: Experiences from Taiwan. Electronic Library and Information Systems, 45(3): 294-307.