Beyond school boundaries: New health imperatives, families and schools

Discourse

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 635-654

  Rich, Emma ^a  

^a University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

disordered eating; family; health imperatives; health policy; obesity; schools; surveillance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869171215     PISSN: 01596306     EISSN: 14693739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01596306.2012.696498     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Armstrong, D. 1995. The rise of surveillance medicine. Sociology of Health and Illness, 17: 393-404. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.ep10933329
2. Ball, K. 2005. Organization, surveillance and the body: Towards a politics of resistance. Organization, 12(1): 89-108. doi:10.1177/1350508405048578
3. Beckett, L. 2004. Editorial: Health, the body, and identity work in health and physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 9(2): 171-173. doi:10.1080/1357332042000233921
4. Bullen, E., Kenway, J. and Hay, V. 2000. New labour, social exclusion and educational risk management: The case of 'gymslip mums'. Educational Research Journal, 26(4): 441-456. doi:10.1080/713651575
5. Burrows, L. and Wright, J. 2004. The good life: New Zealand children's perspectives on health and self. Sport, Education and Society, 9(2): 193-207. doi:10.1080/1357332042000233930
6. Burrows, L. and Wright, J. 2007. Prescribing practices: Shaping healthy children in schools. International Journal of Children's Rights, 15: 83-98. doi:10.1163/092755607X181685
7. Bury, M. and Gabe, J. 2004. The sociology of health and illness. A reader, London: Routledge.
8. Clough, P.T. 2003. Affect and control: Rethinking the body 'Beyond sex and gender'. Feminist Theory, 4(3): 359-364. doi:10.1177/14647001030043010
9. Clough, P.T., & Halley, J. 2007. The affective turn: Theorizing the social. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
10. Conrad, P. 1992. Medicalization and social control. Annual Review of Sociology, 18: 209-232. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.001233
11. Conrad, P. 2007. The medicalization of society: On the transformation of human conditions into treatable disorders, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
12. Dawson, S. 2006. The impact of institutional surveillance technologies on student behaviour. Surveillance and Society, 4(1/2): 69-84.
13. Department for Education and Skills (DfES). 2003. Every child matters (Green Paper, Cm. 5860). London: The Stationery Office (TSO).
14. Department of Health (DoH). 2004. Choosing health: Making healthier choices easier. London: The stationary office.
15. Department of Health (DH). 2006. Measuring childhood obesity: Guidance to primary care trusts. Retrieved from http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4126385
16. De Pian, L., Evans, J., & Rich, E. (2010 April). Young people's decision making about health as an embodied social process: Reflections from the field. Paper presented at 'Researching Young Lives: Power, Representation and the Research Process' conference, University of Limerick, Ireland.
17. Dowty, T. 2008. Pixie-dust and privacy: What's happening to children's rights in England. Children and Society, 22(5): 393-399. doi:10.1111/j.1099-0860.2008.00173.x
18. Evans, B. and Colls, R. 2009. Measuring fatness, governing bodies: The spatialities of the body mass index (BMI) in anti-obesity politics. Antipode, 41: 1051-1083. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00706.x
19. Evans, B. and Colls, R. 2010. "'Doing more good than harm'? The absent presence of children's bodies in (anti)obesity policy". In The Obesity Debate, Edited by: Monaghan, L., Rich, E. and Aphramor, L. 115-138. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
20. Evans, J. and Davies, B. 2010. Family, class and embodiment: Why school physical education makes so little difference to post school participation patterns in physical activity. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(7): 765-784. doi:10.1080/09518398.2010.529473
21. Evans, B. and Colls, R. 2011. "Doing more good than harm? The absent presence of children's bodies in (anti-)obesity policy". In Debating obesity: Critical perspectives, Edited by: Rich, E., Monaghan, L.F. and Aphramor, L. 115-138. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
22. Evans, J., Rich, E., Davies, B. and Allwood, R. 2008. Education, disordered eating and obesity discourse: Fat fabrications, London: Routledge.
23. Fairclough, N. 2000. New labour, new language, London: Routledge.
24. Fotel, T. and Thomsen, T.U. 2004. The surveillance of children's mobility. Surveillance & Society, 1(4): 535-554.
25. Fraser, S., Maher, J.M. and Wright, J. 2010. Between bodies and collectivities: Articulating the action of emotion in obesity epidemic discourse. Social Theory and Health, 8: 192-209. doi:10.1057/sth.2009.28
26. Fullagar, S. 2009. "Governing healthy family lifestyles through discourses of risk and responsibility". In Biopolitics and the 'obesity epidemic': Governing bodies, Edited by: Wright, J. and Harwood, V. 108-126. New York, NY: Routledge.
27. Gard, M. and Wright, J. 2005. The obesity epidemic, London: Routledge.
28. Gillies, V. 2005. Meeting parents' needs? Discourses of 'support' and 'inclusion' in family policy. Critical Social Policy, 25: 70 doi:10.1177/0261018305048968
29. Giroux, H.A. 1998. Public pedagogy and rodent politics: Cultural studies and the challenge of Disney. Arizona Journal of Hispanic Cultural Studies, 2: 253-266. doi:10.1353/hcs.2011.0009
30. Giroux, H.A. 2003. Racial injustice and disposable youth in the age of zero tolerance. Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(4): 553-565. doi:10.1080/0951839032000099543
31. Green, S. 1999. A plague on the panoptican: Surveillance and power in the global information economy. Information, Communication & Society, 2(1): 26-44. doi:10.1080/136911899359745
32. Griffith, A. and Smith, D. 2005. Mothering for schooling, Abingdon: Routledge Falmer.
33. Haggerty, K.D. and Ericson, R. 2000. The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology, 51(4): 605-622. doi:10.1080/00071310020015280
34. Halse, C., Honey, A. and Boughtwood, D. 2008. Inside anorexia: The experience of girls and their families, London: Jessica Lang.
35. Heir, S.P. 2003. Probing the surveillant assemblage: On the dialectics of surveillance practices as processes of social control. Surveillance and Society, 1(3): 399-411.
36. Henderson, A.C., Harmon, S.M. and Houser, J. 2010. A new state of surveillance? An application of Michel Foucault to modern motherhood. Surveillance & Society, 7(3/4): 231-247.
37. Horvat, E.M., Weininger, E.B. and Lareau, A. 2003. From social ties to social capital: Class differences in the relations between school and parent networks. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2): 319-351. doi:10.3102/00028312040002319
38. House of Commons Health Committee (HOC). 2004. Obesity, third report of session 2003-04 (Vol. 1 report). Retrieved from http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmhealth/23/2304htm#a6
39. Jutel, A. 2005. Weighing health: The moral burden of obesity. Social Semiotics, 15(2): 113-125. doi:10.1080/10350330500154717
40. Jutel, A. 2006. The emergence of overweight as a disease entity: Measuring up normality. Social Science and Medicine, 63(9): 2268-2276. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.05.028
41. Katz, C. 2006. "The state goes home: Local hypervigilance of children and the global retreat from social reproduction". In Surveillance and security: Technological politics and power in everyday life, Edited by: Monahan, T. 27-36. New York, NY: Routledge.
42. Kellner, D. and Share, J. 2007. Critical media literacy: Crucial policy choices for a twenty-first-century democracy. Policy Futures in Education, 5: 59-69. doi:10.2304/pfie.2007.5.1.59
43. Kirk, D. 1993. The body, schooling and culture, Deakin: Deakin University Press.
44. Leahy, D. 2009. "Disgusting pedagogies". In Biopolitics and the 'obesity epidemic', Edited by: Wright, J. and Harwood, V. 172-182. New York, NY: Routledge.
45. Lyon, D. 2002. Editorial: surveillance studies-Understanding visibility, mobility and the phonetic fix. Surveillance and Society, 1(1): 1-7.
46. Lyon, D. 2006. Theorizing surveillance: The panopticon and beyond. Devon: Willan Publishing.
47. Lyon, D. 2007. Surveillance studies: An overview, Cambridge: Polity.
48. Marx, G. and Steeves, V. 2010. From the beginning: Children as subjects and agents of surveillance. Surveillance and Society, 7(3/4): 192-230.
49. McCahill, M. and Finn, R. 2010. The social impact of surveillance in three UK Schools: 'Angels', 'devils' and 'teen mums'. Surveillance & Society, 7(3/4): 273-289.
50. McIntosh, I., Punch, S., Dorrer, N. and Emond, R. 2010. 'You don't have to be watched to make your toast': Surveillance and food practices within residential care for young people. Surveillance & Society, 7(3/4): 290-303.
51. McPhail, D., Gwen, E., Chapman, G. and Beagan, B. 2011. 'Too much of that stuff can't be good': Canadian teens, morality, and fast food consumption. Social Science and Medicine, 73: 301-307. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.05.022
52. Misra, K. 2006. Politico-moral transactions in Indian AIDS Service: Confidentiality, rights and new modalities of governance. Anthropological Quarterly, 79(1): 33-74. doi:10.1353/anq.2006.0008
53. Monahan, T. and Wall, T. 2007. Somatic surveillance: Corporeal control through information networks. Surveillance & Society, 4(3): 154-173.
54. Monahan, T., & Torres, R. 2009. Schools under surveillance: Cultures of control in Public education. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
55. Nichols, N. and Griffith, A.I. 2009. Talk, text and educational action: An institutional ethnography of policy in practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2): 241-255. doi:10.1080/03057640902902286
56. Osmond, C. 2010. Anti-social behaviour and its surveillant inter-assemblage in New South Wales, Australia. Surveillance & Society, 7(3/4): 325-343.
57. Rail, G. 2009. "Canadian youth's discursive constructions of health in the context of obesity discourse". In Biopolitics and the 'obesity epidemic': Governing bodies, Edited by: Wright, J. and Harwood, V. 141-156. London: Routledge.
58. Rich, E. and Perhamus, L. 2011. Editorial: Health surveillance, the body and surveillance. International Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(7): 759-776. doi:10.1080/09518398.2010.529475
59. Rich, E., Evans, J. and De Pian, L. 2011. "Children's bodies, surveillance and the obesity crisis". In Debating obesity: Critical perspectives, Edited by: Rich, E., Monaghan, L. and Aphramor, L. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
60. Rich, E., Monaghan, L., & Aphramor, L. 2011. Debating obesity: Critical perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
61. Rose, N. 2000. Community, citizenship and the third way. American Behaviour Scientist, 43(9): 1395-1411. doi:10.1177/00027640021955955
62. Sandlin, J.A., O'Malley, P. and Burdick, J. 2011. Mapping the complexity of public pedagogy scholarship: 1894-2010. Review of Educational Research, 81(3): 338-375. doi:10.3102/0034654311413395
63. Savage, G.C. 2010. "Problematizing 'Public Pedagogy' in Educational Research". In Public pedagogy: Education and learning beyond schooling, Edited by: Sandlin, J.A., Schultz, B.D. and Burdick, J. 103-115. New York: Routledge.
64. Schubert, W.H. 1981. Knowledge about out-of-school curriculum. Educational Forum, 45: 185-199. doi:10.1080/00131728109336070
65. Schubert, W.H. 2010. "Outside curricula and public pedagogy". In Handbook of public pedagogy: Education and learning beyond schooling, Edited by: Sandlin, J., Schultz, B.D. and Burdick, J. 10New York, NY: Routledge.
66. Shilling, C. 2008. Changing bodies: Habit, crisis and creativity, London: Sage.
67. Steeves, V. and Jones, O. 2010. Editorial: Surveillance and children. Surveillance & Society, 7(3/4): 187-191.
68. Sylva, A. and Pugh, B. 2005. Transforming the early years in England. Oxford Review of Education, 31(1): 11-27. doi:10.1080/0305498042000337165
69. Valentine, G. and Holloway, S.L. 2002. 'Cyberkids? Exploring children's identities and social networks in on-line and off-line worlds' Annals. Association of American Geographers, 92: 302-319. doi:10.1111/1467-8306.00292
70. Walkerdine, V. 2009. "Biopedagogy and beyond". In Biopolitics and the 'obesity epidemic', Edited by: Wright, J. and Harwood, V. 199-209. London: Routledge.
71. Williams, F. 2004. What matters is who works: Why every child matters to new labour. Commentary on the DfES green paper every child matters. Critical Social Policy, 24: 406-427. doi:10.1177/0261018304044366
72. World Health Organization (WHO). 1998. 'Obesity': Preventing and managing the global epidemic. Geneva: Author.
73. Wright, J. 2009. "Biopower, biopedagogies and the obesity epidemic". In Biopolitics and the 'obesity epidemic', Edited by: Wright, J. and Harwood, V. 199-209. London: Routledge.
74. Wright, J. and Harwood, V. 2009. Biopolitics and the 'obesity epidemic': Governing bodies, New York, NY: Routledge.
75. Yar, M. 2003. Panoptic power and the pathologisation of vision: Critical reflections on the Foucauldian thesis. Surveillance & Society, 1(3): 254-271.