Performance-based seismic bridge design for damage and loss limit states

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 36, Issue 13, 2007, Pages 1953-1971

  Mackie, K R ^a   Stojadinovic B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^b Berkeley   (United States)

Author keywords

Confidence level; Highway bridge; Performance objective; Performance based earthquake engineering; Repair cost ratio

Indexed keywords

CONCRETE BRIDGES; HAZARDS; HIGHWAY BRIDGES; LOAD LIMITS; OVERPASSES; REINFORCED CONCRETE;

CONFIDENCE LEVEL; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; REPAIR COST RATIO;

SEISMIC DESIGN;

BRIDGE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PROBABILITY; SEISMIC DESIGN; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 35748930847     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.699     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC). Vision 2000: A Framework for Performance-based Design, vols. I-IIII. Structural Engineers Association of California: Sacramento, 1995.
2. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Report No. FEMA-273, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 1997.
3. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. Report No. FEMA-302, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 1997.
4. Department of Energy (DOE). Natural phenomena hazards design and evaluation criteria for Department of Energy facilities. Report No. DOE-STD-1020-94, US Department of Energy, Washington, DC, 1994.
5. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame buildings. Report No. FEMA-350, SAC Joint Venture, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 2000.
6. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Pre-standard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Report No. FEMA-356, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 2000.
7. Krawinkler H, Zareian F, Medina RA, Ibarra LF. Decision support for conceptual performance-based design. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006; 35(1):115-133.
8. Lagaros ND, Fotis AD, Krikos SA. Assessment of seismic design procedures based on the total cost. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006; 35(11):1381-1401.
9. Cornell CA, Krawinkler H. Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment. PEER Center News 2000; 3(2):1-2.
10. Jalayer F. Direct probabilistic seismic analysis: implementing nonlinear dynamic assessments. Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 2003.
11. Baker J, Cornell CA. Which spectral acceleration are you using? Earthquake Spectra 2006; 22(2):293-312.
12. Shome N, Cornell CA. Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures. Report No. RMS 35, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1999.
13. Baker J, Cornell CA. Uncertainty specification and propagation for loss estimation using FOSM methods. Report No. 2003/07, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 2003.
14. Mackie K, Stojadinović B. Seismic demands for performance-based design of bridges. Report No. 2003/16, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 2003.
15. Mackie KR, Stojadinović B. Fragility basis for California highway overpass bridge seismic decision making. Report No. 2005/02, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 2005.
16. Berry MP, Eberhard MO. Performance models for flexural damage in reinforced concrete columns. Report No. 2003/18, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 2003.
17. Panagiotakos TB, Fardis MN. Deformations of reinforced concrete members at yielding and ultimate. ACI Structural Journal 2001; 98(2):135-148.
18. Hose Y, Silva P, Seible F Development of a performance evaluation database for concrete bridge components and systems under simulated seismic loads. Earthquake Spectra 2000; 16(2):413-442.
19. Cornell CA, Jalayer F, Hamburger RO, Foutch DA. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC/FEMA steel moment frame guidelines. Journal of Structural Engineering 2002; 128(4):526-533.
20. Yun S-Y, Hamburger RO, Cornell CA, Foutch DA. Seismic performance evaluation for steel moment frames. Journal of Structural Engineering 2002; 128(4):534-545.
21. Mackie KR, Stojadinović B. R-Factor parameterized bridge damage fragility curves. Journal of Bridge Engineering 2007, in press.
22. HAZUS. Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology, Technical Manual SR2. National Institute of Building Sciences for Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 1999.
23. Basöz N, Mander J. Enhancement of the Highway Transportation Lifeline Module in HAZUS. National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, DC, 1999.