Experimental tests and analytical model of high damping rubber dissipating devices

Engineering Structures

Volumn 28, Issue 13, 2006, Pages 1874-1884

  Dall'Asta, A ^a   Ragni, L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMERINO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITÀ POLITECNICA DELLE MARCHE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Dynamic behaviour of damper devices; Experimental tests; High damping rubber; Mullins effect; Rheological model

Indexed keywords

CYCLIC LOADS; DAMPING; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RHEOLOGY; STRAIN RATE; VISCOELASTICITY;

DAMPER DEVICES; DYNAMIC BEHAVIOUR; HIGH DAMPING RUBBER; MULLINS EFFECT; RHEOLOGICAL MODEL;

RUBBER;

CYCLIC LOADS; DAMPING; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RHEOLOGY; RUBBER; STRAIN RATE; VISCOELASTICITY;

ANALYTICAL METHOD; CYCLIC LOADING; DAMPING; DYNAMIC PROPERTY; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; RUBBER; STRAIN RATE;

EID: 33750616685     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.03.025     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Dall'Asta A., Dezi L., Giacchetti R., Leoni G., Ragni L.. Dynamic response of composite frames with rubber-based dissipating devices: experimental tests. In: Proceedings of ICASS, fourth international conference on advances in steel structures. 2005
2. Bartera F., and Giacchetti R. Steel dissipating braces for upgrading existing building frames. J Construct Steel Res 60 3 (2004) 751-769
3. Govindjee S., and Simo J.C. Transition from micro-mechanics to computationally efficient phenomenology: carbon black filled rubbers incorporating Mullins effect. J Mech Phys Solids 40 (1992) 213-233
4. Lion A. On large deformation behaviour of reinforced rubber at different temperatures. J Mech Phys Solids 45 (1997) 1805-1834
5. FEMA 450: NEHRP Recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. Part 1: Provisions. Washington D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency; 2003
6. FEMA 356: Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency; 2000
7. PrEN 1998-2. Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 2: Bridges. Brussels (Belgium): CECN, European Committee for standardization, 2003
8. Dorfmann A., and Ogden R.W. A constitutive model for the Mullins effect with permanent set in particle-reinforced rubber. Int J Solids Struct 41 (2004) 1855-1878
9. Lion A. A physically based method to represent the thermomechanical behaviour of elastomers. Acta Mech 123 (1997) 1-25
10. Govindjee S., and Simo J.C. A micro-mechanically based continuum damage model for carbon black filled-rubber incorporating the Mullins effect. J Mech Phys Solids 39 (1991) 87-112
11. Dorfmann A., and Ogden R.W. A pseudo-elastic model for loading, partial unloading and reloading of particle-reinforced rubber. Int J Solids Struct 40 (2003) 2699-2714
12. Govindjee S., and Simo J.C. Mullins effect and the strain amplitude dependence of the storage modulus. Int J Solids Struct 29 (1992) 1737-1751
13. Haupt P., and Sedlan H. Viscoplasticity of elastomeric materials: experimental facts and constitutive modelling. Arch Appl Mech 71 (2001) 89-109
14. Chopra A.K. Dynamics of structures: theory and applications to earthquake engineering. 2nd ed. (2000), Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (NJ)
15. Fabrizio M., Morro A.. Mathematical problems in linear viscoelasticity, Philadelphia: SIAM-Studies In Applied Mathematics; 1992