A development framework for value-centred design

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 1292-1295

  Cockton, Gilbert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUNDERLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Design; Evaluation; Scenarios; Value centred HCI

Indexed keywords

CONTEXT OF USE; DESIGN PROJECTS; DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGY; DIGITAL PRODUCTS; EVALUATION; IMPACT ANALYSIS; INTERACTIVE SYSTEM; MAIN PROCESS; SCENARIOS; VALUE DELIVERY; VALUE-CENTRED HCI;

HUMAN ENGINEERING; ITERATIVE METHODS;

DESIGN;

EID: 84869105716     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1056808.1056899     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Beyer, H. and Holtzblatt, K., Contextual Design, Morgan Kaufman, 1998.
2. Card, S.K., "The human, the computer, the task and their interaction - analytic models and use-centered design," in Mind matters: a tribute to Allen Newell, Steier, D.M. & Mitchell, T.M., (eds); 250-312; 1996.
3. Cockton, G., "From Quality in Use to Value in the World", CHI 2004 Extended Abstracts, 1287-90, 2004.
4. Cockton, G., "Three and a Half Decades of HCI: Three Bricks Walls and Half a Ladder," in Proc. HCI 2004, Vol. 2, eds. A. Dearden and Leon Watts, 17-20, 2004.
5. Cockton, G., "Value-Centred HCI", in Proceedings of NordiCHI 2004, ed. A. Hyrskykari, 149-160, 2004.
6. Cooper, A. and Reimann, R.M, About Face 2.0: The Essentials of Interaction Design, Wiley, 2003.
7. John, B., "Beyond the UI: Product, Process and Passion," in Proc. NordiCHI 2004, 285-286, 2004
8. Light, A. "HCI 2004 hears the New Rules of Design," http://www.usabilitynews.com/news/article1933.asp
9. Wasserman, A.I., "The design of idiot-roof interactive systems," in Proc. National Computer Conference, AFIPS, M34-M38, 1973.
10. Wilson, C., "Reader's Questions: Severity Scale for Classifying Usability Problems," Usability Interface," 5(4), April 1999, available at http://www.stcsig.org/ usability/newsletter/9904-severity-scale.html
11. Wixon, D., "Evaluating usability methods: why the current literature fails the practitioner," in Interactions, 10(4), 28-34, 2003.