Value-centred HCI

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 82, Issue , 2004, Pages 149-160

  Cockton, Gilbert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUNDERLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Context; Design; Guidelines; Stakeholders; Usability; Value centred HCI

Indexed keywords

CONTEXT DESIGN; NEW SOURCES; RESEARCH AGENDA; SINGLE PROCESS; VALUE-CENTRED HCI;

DESIGN; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 77953073119     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1028014.1028038     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. Barnum, C., Bevan, N., Cockton, G., Nielsen, J., Spool, J., and Wixon, D., "The "Magic Number 5": Is It Enough for Web Testing?" in CHI 2003 Extended Abstracts, ACM, 698-699, 2003.
2. Bevan, N., "Quality in use: Meeting user needs for quality," J. System and Software, 49(1), 89-96, 1999. (Pubitemid 30523059)
3. Card, S.K., Moran, T., and Newell, A., The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1983.
4. Carroll, J.M. (ed.), Scenario Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in Systems Development, Wiley, 1995.
5. Cassidy, B., Cockton, G. and Coventry, L., "An Interaction Analysis Approach to Accessibility," to appear in Proc. HCI 2004, Vol 2, 2004.
6. Clarke, S, Encouraging the Effective Use of Contextual Information in Design, PhD Thesis, Department of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, 1997.
7. Cockton, G., "A New Model for Separable Interactive Systems," in Proc. INTERACT'87, eds. H.-J. Bullinger and B. Shackel, North-Holland, 1033-1038, 1987.
8. Cockton, G., "Designing abstractions for communication control," in Formal Methods in Human Computer Interaction, eds. M.D. Harrison and H.W. Thimbleby, Cambridge University Press, 233-271, 1990.
9. Cockton G., "The Architectural Bases of Design Reuse" in User Interface Management and Design, eds. D.A. Duce, M.R. Gomes, F.R.A. Hopgood and J.R. Lee, Springer-Verlag, 15 34, 1991.
10. Cockton, G., "From Quality in Use to Value in the World", in CHI 2004 Extended Abstracts, ACM, ISBN 1-5811 3-703-6, 1287-1290, 2004.
11. Cockton, G. and Clarke, S., "Using Contextual Information Effectively in Design", in Proc. INTERACT 99, eds. A. Sasse and C. Johnson, 578-585, 1999.
12. Cockton, G. and Lavery, D. "A Framework for Usability Problem Extraction", in Proc. INTERACT 99, eds. A. Sasse and C. Johnson, 347-355, 1999.
13. Cockton, G., Lavery, D., and Woolrych, A., "Inspection-based methods", in The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, eds. J. Jacko and A. Sears, 1118-1138, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003.
14. Cockton, G. & Woolrych, A., "Understanding Inspection Methods: Lessons from an Assessment of Heuristic Evaluation," in People & Computers XV, eds. A. Blandford, J. Vanderdonckt and P.D. Gray, Springer-Verlag, 171-92, 2001
15. Cooper, A. and Reimann, R.M, About Face 2.0: The Essentials of Interaction Design, Wiley 2003.
16. Curtis, B., "The crucible of a new discipline," in Proc. First U.S.A-Japan Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, G. Salvendy (ed.), Elsevier, 67-72, 1984
17. Dix, A.J., Formal Methods for Interactive Systems, Academic Press, 1991.
18. Doherty E.P, Cockton G., Bloor C. & Benigno, D., "Mixing Oil and Water: Transcending Method Boundaries in Assistive Technology for Traumatic Brain Injury," in Proc. First Conference on Universal Usability, eds. J. Sholtz and J. Thomas, ACM, 110-117, 2000.
19. Doherty E.P, Cockton G., Bloor C. & Benigno, D., "Improving the Performance of the Cyberlink Mental Interface with the Yes/No Program," in Proc. CHI 2001, eds. Eds. J.A. Jacko, A. Sears, M. Beaudouin-Lafon & R.J.K Jacob, ACM, 69-76, 2001.
20. Gnanayutham, P., Bloor C., and Cockton G. "Artificial Intelligence to Enhance a Brain Computer Interface," in Proceedings of HCI International 2003, ed. C. Stephanidis 1397-1401, LEA 2003.
21. Gram, C. and Cockton, G. (eds.), Design Principles for Interactive Systems, Chapman and Hall, 1996
22. Gray, W. D., John, B. E., & Atwood, M.E., "Project Ernestine: Validating GOMS for predicting and explaining real-world task performance," Human Computer Interaction., 8(3), 237-309, 1993.
23. Hansen, W.J., "User Engineering Principles for Interactive Systems" in Fall Joint Computer Conference, 523-532, AFIPS, 1971.
24. Haraway, D., Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. Routledge, 1991
25. Hughes, J., Why Functional Programming Matters, http://www.md.chalmers. se/~rjmh/Papers/whyfp.pdf, last accessed 28/7/04.
26. John, B.E., & Mashyna, M.M, "Evaluating a multimedia authoring tool," J. American Society for Information Science, 48(11), 1004-1022, 1997.
27. Landauer, T. K. and Nielsen, J. "A Mathematical Model of the Finding of Usability Problems," in Proc. INTERCHI '93, 206-213, 1993.
28. Lavery, D. Cockton, G. and Atkinson, M.P.,"Comparison of Evaluation Methods Using Structured Usability Problem Reports," in Behaviour and Information Technology, 16(4), 246-266. 1997
29. Lieberman, H. The Tyranny of Evaluation, http://web.media.mit.edu/ ~lieber/Misc/Tyranny-Evaluation.html, last accessed 28/7/04.
30. Maguire, M., "An Evaluation of Published Recommendations on the Design of Man-Computer Dialogues," Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, 16(3), 237-261, 1982. (Pubitemid 12082991)
31. Marx, K., Economic & Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844, Progress Publishers, Moscow 1959;
32. Martin, D., Bowers, J., Wastell, D.G., "The interactional affordances of technology: an ethnography of human-computer interaction in an ambulance control centre", in People and Computers XII, eds. H. Thimbleby, B. O'Conaill and P. Thomas, Springer, 263-281, 1997.
33. Monk, A.F., Wright, P.C., Davenport, L. & Haber, J. Improving your human-computer interface: a practical technique, Prentice-Hall, 1993.
34. Moore, G.E., "Cramming more components onto integrated circuits," in Electronics, 38(8), 1965.
35. Nielsen, J. "Enhancing the Explanatory Power of Usability Heuristics", in Proc. CHI'94, eds. B. Adelson, S. Dumais, S., and J. Olson, ACM, 152-158, 1994.
36. Object Management Group, Introduction to OMG's Unified Modeling Language™ (UML®), http://www.omg.org/gettingstarted/what-is-uml.htm, last accessed 28/7/04.
37. Open University PMT607 course team with G. Cockton, Design Tools, PMT607 (HCI) Unit 8, Open University: Milton Keynes, 1990.
38. Perlman, G., "Making the right choices with menus," in Proc. INTERACT'84, 291-7, 1984.
39. Pew, R. W., "Evolution of human-computer interaction: from Memex to Bluetooth and beyond", in The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, eds. J. Jacko and A. Sears, 1-17, LEA, 2003
40. Preece. J. A Guide to Usability: Human Factors in Computing, Addison Wesley, 1992
41. State of Arizona, POLICY P130 Web Site Accessibility, http://gita.state.az.us/policies-standards/html/p130-web-site-accessibility- policy.htm, last accessed 28/7/04
42. Sommerville, I., Rodden, T., Bentley, R., and Sawyer, P. "Sociologists can be surprisingly useful in interactive systems design," in People and Computers VII, eds. A. Monk, D. Diaper and M. Harrison, 341-353, 1992.
43. Spool, J. and Schroeder, W. "Testing Websites: Five Users is Nowhere Near Enough," in CHI 2001 Extended Abstracts, ACM, 285-286, 2001.
44. van Welie, M., and van der Veer, G. C., "Pattern Languages in Interaction Design: Structure and Organization", in Proc INTERACT 2003, 2003.
45. Wasserman, A.I., "The design of idiot-proof interactive systems," in Proc. National Computer Conference, AFIPS, M34-M38, 1973.
46. Whiteside, J., Bennett, J., & Holtzblatt, K., "Usability engineering: Our experience and evolution," in Handbook of HCI, 1st Edition, ed. M. Helander., North-Holland, 791-817, 1988.
47. Zhai, S., Evaluation is the worst form of HCI research except all those other forms that have been tried, http://www.almaden.ibm.com/u/zhai/papers/ EvaluationDemocracy.htm, last accessed 28/7/04.