Transonic velocity fluctuations simulated using extremum diminishing uncertainty quantification based on inverse distance weighting

Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 459-479

  Witteveen, Jeroen A S ^a   Bijl, Hester ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Extremum diminishing; Inverse distance weighting; Transonic flow; Uncertainty quantification

Indexed keywords

A-COEFFICIENT; ANALYTICAL TESTS; COMPUTATIONAL PREDICTIONS; EXTREMUM DIMINISHING; INVERSE DISTANCE WEIGHTING; LIMIT VALUES; POWER PARAMETERS; PROBABILITY SPACES; RESPONSE SURFACE APPROXIMATION; TEST CASE; TRANSONIC VELOCITIES; UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATIONS; VELOCITY FLUCTUATIONS; WAVE DRAGS;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; DRAG; TRANSONIC FLOW;

PROBABILITY;

ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK; INVERSE PROBLEM; PROBABILITY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SHOCK WAVE; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; VARIANCE ANALYSIS;

EID: 84869088048     PISSN: 09354964     EISSN: 14322250     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00162-011-0233-y     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Babuška, I., Tempone, R., Zouraris, G.E.: Galerkin finite element approximations of stochastic elliptic partial differential equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 42, 800-"825 (2004)
2. Babuška, I., Nobile, F., Tempone, R.: A stochastic collocation method for elliptic partial differential equations with random input data. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 45, 1005-"1034 (2007)
3. Bartier, P.M., Keller, C.P.: Multivariate interpolation to incorporate thematic surface data using inverse distance weighting (IDW). Comput. Geosci. 22, 795-"799 (1996)
4. Bowen, G.J., Revenaugh, J.: Interpolating the isotopic composition of modern meteoric precipitation. Water Resour. Res. 39, 1299 (2003)
5. Chorin, A.J., Marsden, J.E.: A Mathematical Introduction to Fluid Mechanics. Springer, New York (1979)
6. Cressman, G.P.: An operational objective analysis system. Mon. Weather Rev. 87, 367-"374 (1959)
7. Deb, M., Babuška, I., Oden, J.: Solution of stochastic partial differential equations using Galerkin finite element techniques. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 190, 6359-"6372 (2001) (Pubitemid 32984202)
8. Ghanem, R.G., Spanos, P.: Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach. Springer-"Verlag, New York (1991)
9. Ghanem, R.: Ingredients for a general purpose stochastic finite elements implementation. Comput. Method. Appl. M. 168, 19-"34 (1999)
10. Hammersley, J.M., Handscomb, D.C.: Monte Carlo Methods. Methuen's monographs on applied probability and statistics. Fletcher & Son Ltd., Norwich (1964)
11. Hosder, S., Walters, R.W. Perez, R.: A non-"intrusive polynomial chaos method for uncertainty propagation in CFD simulations. In: Proceedings of the 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, AIAA-"2006-"891 (2006)
12. Hosder, S., Walters, R.W., Balch, M., Efficient sampling for non-"intrusive polynomial chaos applications with multiple uncertain input variables. In: Proceedings of the 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, AIAA-"2007-"1939 (2007)
13. Jameson, A.: Positive schemes and shock modelling for compressible flows. Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids 20, 743-"776 (1995)
14. Koobus, B., Farhat, C.: Second-order time-accurate and geometrically conservative implicit schemes for flow computations on unstructured dynamic meshes. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 170, 103-"129 (1999)
15. Loève, M.: Probability Theory, fourth ed. Springer-"Verlag, New York (1977)
16. Loeven, G.J.A., Bijl, H.: Probabilistic collocation used in a two-"step approach for efficient uncertainty quantification in computational fluid dynamics. CMES 36, 193-"212 (2008)
17. Le Maître,O.P., Knio,O.M., Najm,H.N., Ghanem,R.G.:Astochastic projectionmethod for fluid flow: I.Basic formulation. J. Comput. Phys. 173, 481-"511 (2001)
18. Le Maître, O.P., Reagan, M.T., Najm, H.N., Ghanem, R.G., Knio, O.M.: A stochastic projection for fluid flow: II. Random process. J. Comput. Phys. 181, 9-"44 (2002)
19. Le Maître, O.P., Najm, H.N., Ghanem, R.G., Knio, O.M.: Multi-"resolution analysis ofWiener-"type uncertainty propagation schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 197, 502-"531 (2004) (Pubitemid 38955945)
20. Mathelin, L., Hussaini, M.Y., Zang, T.A., Bataille, F.: Uncertainty propagation for a turbulent, compressible nozzle flow using stochastic methods. AIAA J. 42, 1669-"1676 (2004)
21. Mathelin, L., Hussaini, M.Y., Zang, Th.A.: Stochastic approaches to uncertainty quantification in CFD simulations. Num. Alg. 38, 209-"236 (2005) (Pubitemid 41195956)
22. Mathelin, L., Le Maître, O.: Dual-"based a posteriori error estimate for stochastic finite elementmethods. Comm. App. Math. Comput. Sci. 2, 83-"115 (2007)
23. Melchers, R.E.: Structural Reliability: Analysis and Prediction. Wiley, New York (1987)
24. Najm, H.N.: Uncertainty quantification and polynomial chaos techniques in computational fluid dynamics. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 41, 35-"52 (2009)
25. Nellner, P.-Ch., Zierep, J.: A local solution method for shock boundary-"layer interaction on a swept wing. Acta Mech. 101, 45-"57 (1993)
26. Okabe, A.,Boots, B., Sugihara,K.: Spatial Tessellations:Concepts andApplications ofVoronoi Diagrams.Wiley, Chichester, New York (1992)
27. Reagan, M.T., Najm, H.N., Ghanem, R.G., Knio, O.M.: Uncertainty quantification in reacting-"flow simulations through non-"intrusive spectral projection. Combust. Flame 132, 545-"555 (2003) (Pubitemid 36344128)
28. Shepard, D.: A two-"dimensional interpolation function for irregularly-"spaced data. In: Proceedings of the 1968 ACM National Conference, 517-"524 (1968)
29. Tatang, M.A.: Direct Incorporation of Uncertainty in Chemical and Environmental Engineering Systems. PhD thesis, MIT, Cambridge (1995)
30. Wan, X., Karniadakis, G.E.: An adaptive multi-"element generalized polynomial chaos method for stochastic differential equations. J. Comput. Phys. 209, 617-"642 (2005) (Pubitemid 40919643)
31. Wiener, N.: The homogeneous chaos. Am. J. Math. 60, 897-"936 (1938)
32. Witteveen, J.A.S., Bijl, H.: A monomial chaos approach for efficient uncertainty quantification in nonlinear problems. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 30, 1296-"1317 (2008)
33. Witteveen, J.A.S., Bijl, H.: Effect of randomness on multi-frequency aeroelastic responses resolved by unsteady adaptive stochastic finite elements. J. Comput. Phys. 228, 7025-"7045 (2009)
34. Witteveen, J.A.S., Loeven, G.J.A., Bijl, H.: An adaptive stochastic finite elements approach based on Newton-"Cotes quadrature in simplex elements. Comput. Fluids 38, 1270-"1288 (2009)
35. Witteveen, J.A.S., Bijl, H.: A TVD uncertainty quantification method with bounded error applied to transonic airfoil flutter. Commun. Comput. Phys. 6, 406-"432 (2009)
36. Xiu, D., Karniadakis, G.E.: The Wiener-"Askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 24, 619-"644 (2002)
37. Xiu, D., Lucor, D., Su, C.,-H., Karniadakis, G.E.: Stochastic modeling of flow-"structure interactions using generalized polynomial chaos. J. Fluid. Eng. 124, 51-"59 (2002) (Pubitemid 40000429)
38. Xiu, D., Karniadakis, G.E.: Modeling uncertainty in flow simulations via generalized polynomial chaos. J. Comput. Phys. 187, 137-"167 (2003) (Pubitemid 36515575)
39. Xiu, D.: Fast numerical methods for stochastic computations: A review. Commun. Comput. Phys. 5, 242-"272 (2009)
40. Yates, E. Jr.: AGARD Standard Aeroelastic Configurations for Dynamic Response. Candidate Configuration I.-"Wing 445.6. Technical Memorandum 100492, NASA (1987)
41. Van Zuijlen, A.H., De Boer, A., Bijl, H.: Higher-order time integration through smooth mesh deformation for 3D fluidstructure interaction simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 224, 414-"430 (2007)