Mechanical evaluation and cell response of woven polyetheretherketone scaffolds

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 100 A, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 3326-3331

  Edwards, S L ^a   Werkmeister, J A ^a  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

Fibroblasts; Polyetheretherketone; Scaffold; Tissue engineering

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; ELASTICITY; ETHERS; FIBROBLASTS; POLYETHER ETHER KETONES; POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATES; SCAFFOLDS; TISSUE ENGINEERING; WEAR RESISTANCE; WEAVING;

BIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; BIOMEDICAL DEVICES; BURST STRENGTH; CELL NUMBER; CELL RESPONSE; CURVATURE ANGLE; ELASTIC RECOVERY; FIBROBLAST CELLS; HIGH PERFORMANCE POLYMER; HIGH RESISTANCE; IN-VITRO; LARGE PORES; MECHANICAL EVALUATION; MOUSE-FIBROBLASTS; MULTI-FILAMENT; SOFT TISSUE; STRUCTURAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; TISSUE ENGINEERING SCAFFOLD; WOVEN STRUCTURE;

SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

POLYETHERETHERKETONE; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL CELL CULTURE; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRUCTURE; FIBROBLAST; IN VITRO STUDY; MOUSE; NANOFABRICATION; NONHUMAN; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84869085234     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34286     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Eschbach L. Nonresorbable polymers in bone surgery. Injury 2000;31:D22-D27. (Pubitemid 32401107)
2. Williams DF, McNamara A, Turner RM. Potential of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and carbon-fibre-reinforced PEEK in medical applications. J Mater Sci Lett 1987;6:188-190. (Pubitemid 17571474)
3. Fujihara K, Huang Z-M, Ramakrishna S, Satknanantham K, Hamada H. Performance study of braided carbon/PEEK composite compression bone plates. Biomaterials 2003;24:2661-2667. (Pubitemid 36506488)
4. Fujihara K, Huang Z-M, Ramakrishna S, Satknanantham K, Hamada H. Feasibility of knitted carbon/PEEK composites for orthopaedic bone plates. Biomaterials 2004;25:3877-3885. (Pubitemid 38327077)
5. Sagomonyants KB, Jarman-Smith ML, Devine JN, Aronow MS, Gronowicz GA. The in vitro response of human osteoblasts to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) substrates compared to commercially pure titanium. Biomaterials 2008;29:1563-1572.
6. von Wilmowsky C, Vairaktaris E, Pohle D, Rechtenwald T, Lutz R, Münstedt H, Koller G, Schmidt M, Neukam FW, Schlegel KA, Nkenke E. Effects of bioactive glass and β-TCP containing three-dimensional laser sintered polyetheretherketone composites on osteoblasts in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008;87 A: 896-902.
7. Morrison C, Macnair R, MacDonald C, Wykman A, Goldie I, Grant MH. In vitro biocompatibility testing of polymers for orthopaedic implants using cultured fibroblasts and osteoblasts. Biomaterials 1995;16:987-992.
8. Katzer A, Marquardt H, Westendorf J, Wening JV, von Foerster G. Polyetheretherketone-Cytotoxicity and mutagenicity in vitro. Biomaterials 2002;23:1749-1759.
9. Scotchford CA, Garle MJ, Batchelor J, Bradley J, Grant DM. Use of a novel carbon fibre composite material for the femoral stem component of a THR system: In vitro biological assessment. Biomaterials 2003;24:4871-4879. (Pubitemid 37188667)
10. Hunter A, Archer CW, Walker PS, Blunn GW. Attachment and proliferation of osteoblasts and fibroblasts on biomaterials for orthopaedic use. Biomaterials 1995;16:287-295.
11. von Wilmowsky C, Lutz R, Meisel U, Srour S, Rupprecht S, Toyoshima T, Nkenke E, Schlegel KA, Pohle D, Münstedt H, et al. In vivo evaluation of β-TCP containing 3D laser sintered poly (ether ether ketone) composites in pigs. J Bioact Compat Polym 2009;24:169-184.
12. Nieminen T, Kallela I, Wuolijoki E, Kainulainen H, Hiidenheimo I, Rantala I. Amorphous and crystalline polyetheretherketone: Mechanical properties and tissue reactions during a 3-year followup. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008;84 A: 377-383.
13. Jockisch KA, Brown SA, Bauer TW, Merritt K. Biological response to chopped-carbon-fibre-reinforced PEEK. J Biomed Mater Res 1992;26:133-146.
14. Rivard CH, Rhalmi S, Coillard C. In vivo biocompatibility testing of PEEK polymer for a spinal implant system: A study in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;62:488-498.
15. Toth JM, Wang M, Estes BT, Scifert JL, Seim HB, Turner AS. Polyetheretherketone as a biomaterial for spinal applications. Biomaterials 2006;27:324-334. (Pubitemid 41457235)
16. Scholes SC, Unsworth A. Pitch-based carbon-fibre-reinforced poly (ether-ether-ketone) OPTIMA (R) assessed as a bearing material in a mobile bearing unicondylar knee joint. Proc Inst Mech Eng H Eng Med 2009;223:13-25.
17. Scolozzi P, Martinez A, Jaques B. Complex orbito-fronto-temporal reconstruction using computer-designed PEEK implant. J Craniofac Surg 2007;18:224-228. (Pubitemid 46170771)
18. Tan KH, Chua CK, Leong KF, Cheah CM, Gui WS, Tan WS, Wiria FE. Selective laser sintering of biocompatible polymers for applications in tissue engineering. Biomed Mater Eng 2005;15:113-124. (Pubitemid 40916706)
19. Li Y, Ma T, Yang S-T, Kniss DA. Thermal compression and characterization of three-dimensional nonwoven PET matrices as tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials 2001;22:609-618. (Pubitemid 32015883)
20. Ma T, Li Y, Yang S-T, Kniss DA. Effects of pore size in 3-D fibrous matrix on human trophoblast tissue development. Biotechnol Bioeng 2000;70:606-618.
21. Kang X, Xie Y, Kniss DA. Adipose tissue model using three-dimensional cultivation of preadipocytes seeded onto fibrous polymer scaffolds. Tissue Eng 2005;11:458-468. (Pubitemid 40632561)
22. 2001.2.15 A. Determination of thickness of textile fabrics. Australian Standards: Australian Standards; 1989.
23. AS2001.2.13. Determination of mass per unit area of fabrics. Australian Standards: Australian Standards; 1987.
24. 2001.2.3.1 A. Determination of maximum force and elongation at maximum force under the strip method. Australian Standards: Australian Standards; 2001.
25. 2001.2.19 A. Determination of bursting force of textile fabrics-Ball burst methods. Australian Standards: Australian Standards; 1988.
26. Briem D, Strametz S, Schroder K, Meenen NM, Lehmann W, Linhart W, Ohl A, Rueger JM. Response of primary fibroblasts and osteoblasts to plasma treated polyetheretherketone (PEEK) surfaces. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2005;16:671-677. (Pubitemid 40908902)
27. Noiset O, Schneider Y-J, Marchand-Brynaert J. Fibronectin adsorption or/and covalent grafting on chemically modified PEEK film surfaces. J Biomater Sci Polym Edn 1999;10:657-677. (Pubitemid 29259806)
28. Edwards SL, Church JS, Alexander DLJ, Russell SJ, Ingham E, Ramshaw JAM, Werkmeister JA. Modelling tissue growth within nonwoven scaffold pores. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2011;17:123-130.
29. Hogan ME, Degaetano DH, Klomparens KL. Effects of substrate texture and curvature on the morphology of cultured cells. J Electron Microsc Tech 1991;18:106-116.
30. Mohamed MH, Bogdanovich AE, Ing H, Dickinson LC, Singletary JN, Lienhart RB. A new generation of 3D woven fabric preforms and composites. SAMPE J 2001;37:8-17. (Pubitemid 32443839)
31. Moutos FT, Freed LE, Guilak F. A biomimetic three-dimensional woven composite scaffold for functional tissue engineering of cartilage. Nat Mater 2007;6:162-167. (Pubitemid 46197652)
32. McCullen SD, Haslauer CM, Loboa EG. Fibre-reinforced scaffolds for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: Use of traditional textile substrates to nanofibrous arrays. J Mater Chem 2010;20:8776-8788.