A multidimensional analysis of electricity generation options with different scenarios in Turkey

Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning and Policy

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 44-55

  Boran, F E ^a   Dizdar, E ^b   Toktas, I ^c   Boran, K ^a   Eldem, C ^a   Asal, O ^a  

^a GAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b KARABUK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c YILDIRIM BEYAZIT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Electricity generation; Modified TOPSIS Method; Multi criteria decision making

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON MONOXIDE; COSTS; DECISION MAKING; ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION; GAS EMISSIONS; GAS PLANTS; GLOBAL WARMING; GREENHOUSE GASES; LIGNITE;

COAL BASED POWER PLANTS; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; ENERGY; ENERGY SOURCE; ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS; MODIFIED TOPSIS METHOD; MULTI CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; MULTI-DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; MULTICRITERION DECISION MAKINGS;

DEVELOPING COUNTRIES;

EID: 84868640588     PISSN: 15567249     EISSN: 15567257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15567240903117591     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Akpinar, E. K., and Akpinar, S. 2004. Determination of the wind energy potential for Maden-Elazi ̈g, Turkey. Energ. Convers. Manage. 45:2901-2914.
2. Balat, M. 2006. Current geothermal energy potential in Turkey and use of geothermal energy. Energ. Source. Part B. 1:55-65. (Pubitemid 44115045)
3. Bilen, K., Ozyurt, O., Bakirci, K., Karsli, S., Erdogan, S., Yilmaz, M., and Comakli, O. 2008. Energy production, consumption, and environmental pollution for sustainable development: A case study in Turkey. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 12:1529-1561. (Pubitemid 351615085)
4. Boran, F. E., and Boran K. 2012. Evaluation of natural gas systems: A comparison with Turkey. Energ. Source. Part B 7:222-229.
5. Boran, F. E., Boran, K., and Dizdar, E. 2012a. A fuzzy multi criteria decision making to evaluate energy policy based on information axiom: Case study in Turkey. Energ. Source. Part B 7:230-240.
6. Boran, F. E., Boran, K., and Menlik, T. 2012b. Evaluation of renewable energy technologies for electricity generation in Turkey using Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS. Energ. Source. Part B 7:81-90.
7. Boran, F. E., Menlik, T., and Boran, K. 2010. Multi-criteria axiomatic design approach to evaluate sites for grid-connected photovoltaic power plants: A case study in Turkey. Energ. Source. Part B 5:290-300.
8. Cerci, Y. 2003. Performance evaluation of a single-flash geothermal power plant in Denizli Turkey. Energy 28:27-35. (Pubitemid 35404966)
9. Cheng, C. H. 1999. Evaluating weapon systems using ranking fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 107:25-35.
10. Deng, H., Yeh, C. H., and Willis, R. J. 2000. Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights. Comput. Oper. Res. 27:963-973. (Pubitemid 30334512)
11. Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2006. Turkey Country Analysis Brief. Available at: http://www.eia.doe.gov.
12. Gokcen, G., Ozturk, H. K., and Hepbasli, A. 2004. Overview of Kizildere geothermal power plant in Turkey. Energ. Convers. Manage. 45:83-98.
13. Gunerhan, G., Kocar, G., and Hepbasli, A. 2001. Geothermal energy utilization in Turkey. Int. J. Energ. Res. 25:769-784.
14. Gungor, Z., and Arikan, F. 2000. A fuzzy outranking method in energy policy planning. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 114:115-122.
15. Hepbasli, A., and Ozgener, O. 2004a. A review on the development of wind energy in Turkey. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 8:257-276.
16. Hepbasli, A., and Ozgener, L. 2004b. Development of geothermal energy utilization in Turkey: A review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 8:433-460.
17. Hwang, C. L., and Yoon, K. 1981. Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
18. International Energy Agency (IEA). 2005. Energy policies of IEA countries: Turkey 2005 review. Paris: OECD/IEA.
19. International Hydropower Association (IHA). 2006. Hydropower information and country report for Turkey. Available from http://www.hydropower.org
20. Kilic, F. C., and Kaya, D. 2007. Energy production, consumption, policies, and recent developments in Turkey. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 11:1312-1320. (Pubitemid 44827852)
21. Kose, R. 2004. An evaluation of wind energy potential as a power generation source in Kutahya Turkey. Energ. Convers. Manage. 45:1631-1641.
22. Masters, G. M. 2004. Renewable and Efficient Electric Power Systems. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
23. Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources (MENR). 2005. Energy Report of Turkey. Ankara, Turkey. Available at: http://www.enerji.gov.tr.
24. Renewables. 2005. Global Status Report. Available at: www.ren21.net.
25. Renewable Energy Network (REN). 2006. Renewables Global Status Report. Available at: www.worldwatch.com.
26. Saaty, T. L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27. Sancton, T. 2000. The energy crunch. Time 156:36-41.
28. State Institute of Statistics (DIE). 2004. Statistic yearbook of Turkey in 2003. Ankara, Turkey: Prime Ministry, Republic of Turkey.
29. Sozen, A., and Arcaklioglu, E. 2007. Prospects for future projections of the basic energy sources in Turkey. Energ. Source. Part B 2:183-201. (Pubitemid 47360116)
30. Sozen, A., and Nalbant, M. 2007. Situation of Turkey's energy indicators among the EU member states. Energ. Policy 35:4993-5002. (Pubitemid 47065330)
31. Topcu, I. Y., and Ulengin, F. 2004. Energy for the future: An integrated decision aid for the case of Turkey. Energy 29:137-154. (Pubitemid 37312613)
32. Turkish Electricity Transmission Company (TEIAS). 2007. Turkish electrical energy 10-year generation capacity projection (2007-2016). Ankara, Turkey: TEIAS.
33. World Energy Council Turkish National Committee (WECTNC). 2003. Energy report of Turkey in 2002.
34. Yuksek, O., Komurcu, M. I., Yuksel, I., and Kaygusuz, K. 2006. The role of hydropower meeting the electric energy demand in Turkey. Energ. Policy 34:3093-3103. (Pubitemid 44226065)
35. Yuksel, I. 2006. Southeastern Anatolia Project (GAP) for irrigation and hydroelectric power in Turkey. Energ. Explor. Exploit. 24:361-370. (Pubitemid 46094914)
36. Yuksel, I. 2008. Hydropower in Turkey for a clean and sustainable energy future. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 12:1622-1640. (Pubitemid 351615087)