A fuzzy multi criteria decision making to evaluate energy policy based on an information axiom: A case study in Turkey

Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning and Policy

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 230-240

  Boran, F E ^a   Boran, K ^a   Dizdar, E ^b  

^a GAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b KARABUK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

axiomatic design; energy policy; fuzzy set; information; multi criteria decision making

Indexed keywords

AXIOMATIC DESIGN; ECONOMIC GROWTHS; ELECTRIC POWER DEMANDS; ELECTRICITY-CONSUMPTION; EVALUATION PROCESS; FUZZY - MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; FUZZY INFORMATION; INFORMATION; INFORMATION AXIOM; MULTI-CRITERIA; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; OBJECTIVE CRITERIA; POLICY PROBLEM; POWER MARKETS; SOCIAL BENEFITS;

AIRFOILS; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; FOSSIL FUELS; FUZZY SETS; POPULATION STATISTICS; RATING; SOLAR ENERGY; WIND POWER;

ENERGY POLICY;

EID: 84855822392     PISSN: 15567249     EISSN: 15567257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15567240902839294     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Akay, D., and Kulak, O. 2007. Evaluation of product design concepts using grey-fuzzy information axiom. J. Grey Syst. 19: 221-234.
2. Boran, F. E., and Boran, K. 2012. Evaluation of natural gas systems: A comparison with Turkey. Energ. Source. Part B 7: 222-229.
3. Boran, F. E., Boran, K., and Menlik, T. 2012. The evaluation of renewable energy technologies for electricity generation in Turkey using intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS. Energ. Source. Part B 7: 81-90.
4. Boran, F. E., Menlik, T., and Boran, K. 2010. Multi-criteria axiomatic design approach to evaluate sites for grid-connected photovoltaic power plants: A case study in Turkey. Energ. Source. Part B 5: 290-300.
5. Eraslan, E., Akay, D., and Kurt, M. 2006. Usability ranking of intercity bus passenger seats using fuzzy axiomatic theory. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 4101: 141-148. (Pubitemid 44543901)
6. Gungor, Z., and Arikan, F. 2000. A fuzzy outranking method in energy policy planning. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 114: 115-122.
7. Hamalainen, R. P. 1990. A decision aid in public debate on nuclear power. European J. Oper. Res. 48: 66-76.
8. Hamalainen, R. P., and Seppalainen, T. O. 1986. The analytic network process in energy policy planning. Socio. Econ. Plan. Sci. 20: 399-405.
9. International Energy Agency (IEA). 2001. Turkey 2001 review. Paris: OECD/IEA.
10. Kone, A. C., and Buke, T. 2007. An Analytical Network Process (ANP) evaluation of alternative fuels for electricity generation in Turkey. Energ. Policy 35: 5220-5228. (Pubitemid 47065349)
11. Kulak, O. 2005. A decision support system for fuzzy multi-attribute selection of material handling equipments. Expert Syst. Appl. 29: 310-319. (Pubitemid 40970641)
12. Kulak, O., and Kahraman, C. 2005a. Multi-attribute comparison of advanced manufacturing systems using fuzzy vs. crisp axiomatic design approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 95: 415-424. (Pubitemid 40114615)
13. Kulak, O., and Kahraman, C. 2005b. Fuzzy multi-attribute selection among transportation companies using axiomatic design and analytic hierarchy process. Inform. Sciences 170: 191-210. (Pubitemid 40183405)
14. Kulak, O., Durmusoglu, M. B., and Kahraman, C. 2005a. Fuzzy multi-attribute equipment selection based on information axiom. J. Mater. Processing Tech. 169: 337-345. (Pubitemid 41427063)
15. Kulak, O., Kahraman, C., Oztaysi, B., and Tanyas, M. 2005b. Multi attribute information project selection using fuzzy axiomatic design. Journal of Enterprise Management 18: 275-288. (Pubitemid 40924228)
16. Liang, Z., Yang, K., Sun, Y., Yuan, J., Hongwei, Z., and Zhang, Z. 2006. Decision support for choice optimal power generation projects: Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model based on the electricity market. Energ. Policy 34: 3359-3364.
17. Lootsma, F. A., Boonekamp, P. G. M., Cooke, R. M., and VanOostvoorn, F. 1990. Choice of long-term strategy for the national electricity supply via scenario analysis and multi-criteria analysis: A case study. European J. Oper. Res. 48: 189-203.
18. Pohekar, S. D., and Ramachandran, M. 2004. Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planningA review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 8: 365-381.
19. Saaty, T. L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
20. Shannon, C. E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27: 379-426.
21. Suh, N. P. 1990. The Principles of Design. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
22. Suh, N. P. 1995. Design and operation of large systems. Annals of CIRP 14: 203-213.
23. Suh, N. P. 2001. Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
24. Topcu, I. Y., and Ulengin, F. 2004. Energy for the future: An integrated decision aid for the case of Turkey. Energy 29: 137-154. (Pubitemid 37312613)
25. Turkish Electricity Transmission Company (TEIAS). 2007. Turkish electrical energy 10-year generation capacity projection (2007-2016).