Evaluation of natural gas systems: A comparison study for Turkey

Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning and Policy

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 222-229

  Boran, F E ^a   Boran, K ^a  

^a GAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

modified TOPSIS; multi criteria decision making; natural gas; natural gas systems; Turkey

Indexed keywords

COMBINE CYCLE PLANT; COMBINED HEAT AND POWER PLANTS; COMPARISON STUDY; CRITICAL ENERGY; EFFICIENCY INDICATORS; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; FUEL CELL POWER PLANTS; MIDDLE EAST; MODIFIED TOPSIS; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION; NATURAL GAS SYSTEMS; NATURAL SYSTEMS; TECHNIQUE FOR ORDER PREFERENCE BY SIMILARITY TO IDEAL SOLUTIONS; TURKEY;

DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; ELECTRIC GENERATORS; GAS PLANTS; GAS TURBINE POWER PLANTS; GLOBAL WARMING; GREENHOUSE GASES; NATURAL GAS;

NATURAL GASOLINE PLANTS;

EID: 84855835801     PISSN: 15567249     EISSN: 15567257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15567240902744643     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Afgan, N. A., Pilavachi, P. A., and Carvalho, M. G. 2007. Multi-criteria evaluation of natural gas resources. Energ. Policy 35: 704-713. (Pubitemid 44597261)
2. Balat, M. 2004. Oil and natural gas transport systems, trade and consumption trends in Turkey. Energ. Explor. Exploit. 22: 207-216. (Pubitemid 41216619)
3. Balat, M., Ayar, G., Oguzhan, C., and Uluduz, H. 2007. Influence of fossil energy applications on environmental pollution. Energ. Source. Part B 2: 213-226. (Pubitemid 47360100)
4. Bagci, A. S., and Ozturk, E. 2007. Performance prediction of underground gas storage in salt caverns. Energ. Source. Part B 2: 155-165. (Pubitemid 47360114)
5. Bilen, K., Ozyurt, O., Bakirci, K., Karsli, S., Erdogan, S., Yilmaz, M., and Comakli, O. 2008. Energy production, consumption, and environmental pollution for sustainable development: A case study in Turkey. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 12: 1529-1561. (Pubitemid 351615085)
6. Boran, F. E., Boran, K., and Menlik, T. 2012. Evaluation of renewable energy technologies for electricity generation in Turkey using intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS. Energ. Source. Part B 7: 81-90.
7. Boran, F. E., Menlik, T., and Boran, K. 2010. Multi-criteria axiomatic design approach to evaluate sites for grid-connected photovoltaic power plants: A case study in Turkey. Energ. Source. Part B 5: 290-300.
8. British Petroleum (BP). 2008. Statistical Review of World Energy
9. Cetin, T., and Oguz, F. 2007. The reform in the Turkish natural gas market: A critical evaluation. Energ. Policy 35: 3856-3867. (Pubitemid 46577891)
10. Demirbas, A. 2003. Energy and environmental issues relating to greenhouse gas emissions in Turkey. Energ. Convers. Manage. 44: 203-213. (Pubitemid 34974831)
11. Demirbas, M. F. 2007. Progress of fossil fuel science. Energ. Source. Part B 2: 243-257. (Pubitemid 47360103)
12. Demirbas, M. F., and Balat, H. 2008. Major utilization of natural gas for Turkey's energy necessity in recent years. Energ. Source. Part B 3: 166-176. (Pubitemid 351433446)
13. Deng, H., Yeh, C. H., and Willis, R. J. 2000. Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights. Comput. Oper. Res. 27: 963-973. (Pubitemid 30334512)
14. Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2004. Available at: http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/turkey.html#gas
15. Evans, A., Strezov, V., and Evans, T. J. 2009. Assessment of sustainability indicators for renewable energy technologies. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 13: 1082-1088.
16. Hwang, C. L., and Yoon, K. 1981. Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
17. Hordeski, M. F. 2003. New Technologies for Energy Efficiency. New York: Marcel Dekker.
18. Houghton, J. 1997. Global Warming: The Complete Briefing., 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. International Energy Agency (IEA). 2006. International energy annual 2004
20. Kilic, F. C., and Kaya, D. 2007. Energy production, consumption, policies, and recent developments in Turkey. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 11: 1312-1320. (Pubitemid 44827852)
21. Ozturk, M., Bezir, N. C., and Ozek, N. 2008. Energy market structure of Turkey. Energ. Source. Part B 3: 384-395.
22. Saaty, T. L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
23. Sozen, A., and Arcaklioglu, E. 2007. Prospects for future projections of the basic energy sources in Turkey. Energ. Sources Part B 2: 183-201. (Pubitemid 47360116)
24. Sozen, A., Gulseven, Z., and Arcaklioglu, E. 2007. Forecasting based on sectoral energy consumption of GHGs in Turkey and mitigation policies. Energ. Policy 35: 6491-6505. (Pubitemid 350028965)
25. Sozen, A., and Nalbant, M. 2007. Situation of Turkey's energy indicators among the EU member states. Energ. Policy 35: 4993-5002. (Pubitemid 47065330)
26. Turedi, N., and Demirbas, A. 2004. Strategic importance of natural gas and electricity. Energ. Sources 26: 1379-1388.
27. Williams, L. D. 2005. Environmental Science Demystified. New York: McGraw-Hill.