Optical tweezers reveal relationship between microstructure and nanoparticle penetration of pulmonary mucus

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 109, Issue 45, 2012, Pages 18355-18360

  Kirch, Julian ^a   Schneider, Andreas ^a   Abou, Béreng̀ere ^b   Hopf, Alexander ^c   Schaefer, Ulrich F ^a   Schneider, Marc ^a   Schall, Christian ^c   Wagner, Christian ^a   Lehr, Claus Michael ^a,d  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DIDEROT   (France)

^c FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE   (Germany)

^d HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR INFECTION RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cryoelectronmicroscopy; Forced penetration; Pulmonary drug delivery

Indexed keywords

CHITOSAN; MACROGOL; MAGNETIC NANOPARTICLE; MUCIN; NANOPARTICLE;

ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; ELECTRON TOMOGRAPHY; GEL; HYDROGEL; MATERIAL COATING; MUCUS; OPTICAL TWEEZERS; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPIRATORY MUCUS; RIGIDITY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

CELLULOSE; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; HUMANS; HYDROGELS; LUNG; MAGNETIC PHENOMENA; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; MUCUS; NANOPARTICLES; OPTICAL TWEEZERS; PARTICLE SIZE; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; RHEOLOGY;

EID: 84868599371     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1214066109     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Kirch J, et al. (2012) Mucociliary clearance of micro- and nanoparticles is independent of size, shape and charge - an ex vivo and in silico approach. J Control Release 159(1):128-134.
2. Smith DJ, Gaffney EA, Blake JR (2007) A model of tracer transport in airway surface liquid. Bull Math Biol 69(3):817-836. (Pubitemid 46466308)
3. Rothen-Rutishauser B, et al. (2010) Relating the physicochemical characteristics and dispersion of multiwalled carbon nanotubes in different suspension media to their oxidative reactivity in vitro and inflammation in vivo. Nanotoxicology 4(3):331-342.
4. Rothen-Rutishauser BM, Kiama SG, Gehr P (2005) A three-dimensional cellular model of the human respiratory tract to study the interaction with particles. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 32(4):281-289. (Pubitemid 40478303)
5. Lai SK, Wang YY, Wirtz D, Hanes J (2009) Micro- and macrorheology of mucus. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 61(2):86-100.
6. Lieleg O, Ribbeck K (2011) Biological hydrogels as selective diffusion barriers. Trends Cell Biol 21(9):543-551.
7. Macierzanka A, et al. (2011) Adsorption of bile salts to particles allows penetration of intestinal mucus. Soft Matter 7:8077-8084.
8. Sanders NN, et al. (2000) Cystic fibrosis sputum: A barrier to the transport of nanospheres. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162(5):1905-1911.
9. Mura S, et al. (2011) Biodegradable nanoparticles meet the bronchial airway barrier: How surface properties affect their interaction with mucus and epithelial cells. Biomacromolecules 12(11):4136-4143.
10. Olmsted SS, et al. (2001) Diffusion of macromolecules and virus-like particles in human cervical mucus. Biophys J 81(4):1930-1937. (Pubitemid 32917145)
11. Dawson M, Wirtz D, Hanes J (2003) Enhanced viscoelasticity of human cystic fibrotic sputum correlates with increasing microheterogeneity in particle transport. J Biol Chem 278(50):50393-50401. (Pubitemid 37548883)
12. Yoncheva K, Lizarraga E, Irache JM (2005) Pegylated nanoparticles based on poly (methyl vinyl ether-co-maleic anhydride): Preparation and evaluation of their bioadhesive properties. Eur J Pharm Sci 24(5):411-419. (Pubitemid 40387255)
13. Lai SK, et al. (2007) Rapid transport of large polymeric nanoparticles in fresh undiluted human mucus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(5):1482-1487. (Pubitemid 46214616)
14. Crater JS, Carrier RL (2010) Barrier properties of gastrointestinal mucus to nanoparticle transport. Macromol Biosci 10(12):1473-1483.
15. Smart JD (2005) The basics and underlying mechanisms of mucoadhesion. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 57(11):1556-1568.
16. Kuhn SJ, Hallahan DE, Giorgio TD (2006) Characterization of superparamagnetic nanoparticle interactions with extracellular matrix in an in vitro system. Ann Biomed Eng 34(1):51-58.
17. Gillis RB, et al. (2012) Molecular weight distribution analysis by ultracentrifugation: Adaptation of a new approach for mucins. Carbohydr Polym, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.018.
18. Sarbolouki MN, Mahnam K, Rafiee-Pour HA (2004) Determination of pore/protein size via electrophoresis and slit sieve model. Electrophoresis 25(17):2907-2911. (Pubitemid 39294838)
19. Chrambach A, Rodbard D (1971) Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Science 172 (3982):440-451.
20. Andrews GP, Laverty TP, Jones DS (2009) Mucoadhesive polymeric platforms for controlled drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 71(3):505-518.
21. Florey HW (1962) The secretion and function of intestinal mucus. Gastroenterology 43:326-329.
22. Ruge CA, et al. (2012) The interplay of lung surfactant proteins and lipids assimilates the macrophage clearance of nanoparticles. PLoS One 7(7):e40775.
23. Lai SK, Wang YY, Hida K, Cone R, Hanes J (2010) Nanoparticles reveal that human cervicovaginal mucus is riddled with pores larger than viruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(2):598-603.
24. Kirch J, Guenther M, Schneider M, Schaefer UF, Lehr C-M (2012) Computational fluid dynamics of nanoparticle disposition in the airways: Mucus interactions and mucociliary clearance. Comput Vis Sci, 10.1007/s00791-012-0184- x.
25. Gfeller KY, Nugaeva N, Hegner M (2005) Rapid biosensor for detection of antibiotic-selective growth of Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(5):2626-2631. (Pubitemid 40647009)
26. Gastaldi AC, Jardim JR, King M (2000) The influence of temperature and length of time of storage of frog mucus samples. Biorheology 37(3):203-211. (Pubitemid 30624463)
27. Ziehl A, Bammert J, Holzer L, Wagner C, Zimmermann W (2009) Direct measurement of shear-induced cross-correlations of Brownian motion. Phys Rev Lett 103(23):230602.
28. Cheezum MK, Walker WF, Guilford WH (2001) Quantitative comparison of algorithms for tracking single fluorescent particles. Biophys J 81(4):2378-2388. (Pubitemid 32917184)