Factor analysis of the ESL/EFL Strategy Inventory for Language Learning: Generation 1.5 Korean immigrant college students' language learning strategies

Language, Culture and Curriculum

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 231-247

  Heo, Misook ^a   Stoffa, Rosa ^a   Kush, Joseph C ^a  

^a DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

factor analysis; Generation 1.5; Korean immigrant college students; language learning; second language; strategy inventory for language learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84868581244     PISSN: 07908318     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07908318.2012.706302     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Alexander, P. A. 1995. Superimposing a situation-specific and domain-specific perspective on an account of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 30(4): 189-194. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3004_3
2. Anderson, N. J. 1991. Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing. Modern Language Journal, 75(4): 460-472. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05384.x
3. Anisef, P., Axelrod, P., Baichman-Anisef, E., James, C. and Turrittin, A. 2000. Opportunity and uncertainty: Life course experiences of the class of '73, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
4. Benesch, S. 2008. 'Generation 1.5' and its discourses of partiality: A critical analysis. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 7(3-4): 294-311. doi:10.1080/15348450802237954
5. Brown, A. L. and Palincsar, A. S. 1982. Inducing strategic learning from text by means of informed, self-control training. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 2(1): 1-17.
6. Carrell, P., Pharis, B. and Liberto, J. 1989. Metacognitive strategy training for ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 23(4): 647-678. (doi:10.2307/3587536)
7. Cattell, R. B. 1966. The scree-test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2): 245-276. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
8. Chamot, A. 1987. "The learning strategies of ESL students". In Learner strategy in language learning, Edited by: Wenden, A. and Rubin, J. 71-83. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9. Chamot, A. U. 2004. Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1(1): 14-26. Retrieved July 5, 2012, fromhttp://e-flt.nus.edu.sg/v1n12004/chamot.pdf
10. Choi, Y. and Kim, Y. S. 2010. Acculturation and the family: Core vs. peripheral changes among Korean Americans. Gaeioe Hanin Yon Gu, 21: 135-190.
11. Cliff, N. and Hamburger, C. D. 1967. Study of sampling errors in factor analysis by means of artificial experiments. Psychological Bulletin, 68(6): 430-445. doi:10.1037/h0025178
12. Cohen, A. 1998. Strategies in learning and using a second language, Harlow: Addison Wesley.
13. Cortazzi, M. and Jin, L. 1996. "Cultures of learning: Language classrooms in China". In Society and the language classroom, Edited by: Coleman, H. 169-206. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Danico, M. Y. 2004. The 1.5 Generation: Becoming Korean American in Hawaii, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
15. Dinovitzer, R., Hagan, J. and Parker, P. 2003. Choice and circumstance: Social capital and planful competence in the attainments of immigrant youth. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 28(4): 463-488.
16. Dörnyei, Z. 2005. The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Dörnyei, Z. and Skehan, P. 2003. "Individual differences in second language learning". In Handbook of second language acquisition, Edited by: Doughty, C. and Long, M. 589-630. Oxford: Blackwell.
18. El-Dib, M. A.B. 2004. Language learning strategies in Kuwait: Links to gender, language level, and culture in a hybrid context. Foreign Language Annals, 37(1): 85-95. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2004.tb02176.x
19. Ellis, R. 1986. Understanding second language acquisition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Ellis, R. 1994. The study of second language acquisition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Flavell, J. H. 1992. "Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry". In Metacognition: Core readings, Edited by: Nelson, T. 2-9. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
22. Gardner, R. C., Tremblay, P. F. and Masgoret, A. M. 1997. Towards a full model of second language learning: An empirical investigation. The Modern Language Journal, 81(3): 344-362. (doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05495.x)
23. Goldschmidt, M. M. and Miller, C. Z. 2005. Beyond the academic needs of Generation 1.5. Research & Teaching in Developmental Education, 21(2): 10-19.
24. Gorsuch, R. L. 1983. Factor analysis, 2, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Green, J. and Oxford, R. L. 1995. A close look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2): 261-297. (doi:10.2307/3587625)
26. Griffiths, C. (2004). Language learning strategies: Theory and research. Auckland: AIS St. Helens, Centre for Research in International Education.
27. Harklau, L., Losey, K. and Siegal, M. 1999. Generation 1.5 meets college composition: Issues in the teaching of writing to U.S.-educated learners of ESL, Edited by: Harklau, L., Losey, K. and Siegal, M. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Horn, J. L. 1965. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2): 179-185. doi:10.1007/BF02289447
29. Hsiao, T.-Y. and Oxford, R. L. 2002. Comparing theories of language learning strategies: A confirmatory factor analysis. Modern Language Journal, 86(3): 368-383. doi:10.1111/1540-4781.00155
30. Jang, H., Reeve, J., Ryan, R. M. and Kim, A. 2009. Can self-determination theory explain what underlies the productive, satisfying learning experiences of collectivistically oriented Korean students?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3): 644-661. (doi:10.1037/a0014241)
31. Janzen, J. and Stoller, F. 1998. Integrating strategic reading in L2 instruction. Reading in a Foreign Language, 12(1): 251-269.
32. Kato, S. 2005. How language learning strategies affect English proficiency in Japanese university students. Bunkyo Institute University Research, 7(1): 229-262.
33. Khalil, A. 2005. Assessment of language learning strategies used by Palestinian EFL learners. Foreign Language Annals, 38(1): 108-117. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2005.tb02458.x
34. Kim, U. and Park, Y. S. 2006. Indigenous psychological analysis of academic achievement in Korea: The influence of self-efficacy, parents, and culture. International Journal of Psychology, 41(4): 287-292. (doi:10.1080/00207590544000068)
35. Kush, J. C., Watkins, M. W., Ward, T. J., Ward, S. B., Canivez, G. L. and Worrell, F. C. 2001. Construct validity of the WISC-III for White and Black students from the WISC-III standardization sample and for Black students referred for psychological evaluation. School Psychology Review, 30(1): 70-88.
36. Lautenschlager, G. J. 1989. A comparison of alternatives to conducting Monte Carlo analyses for determining parallel analysis criteria. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24(3): 365-395. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2403_6
37. Lee, S. J. 1996. Unraveling the 'model minority' stereotypes: Listening to Asian American youth, New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
38. Lew, J. and Anyon, J. 2003. Asian Americans in class: Charting the achivement gap among Korean American youth, New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
39. LoCastro, V. 1994. Learning strategies and learning environments. TESOL Quarterly, 28(2): 409-414. (doi:10.2307/3587445)
40. Macaro, E. 2001. Learning strategies in foreign and second language classrooms, New York, NY: Continuum International.
41. Macaro, E. 2006. Strategies for language learning and for language use: Revising the theoretical framework. The Modern Language Journal, 90(iii): 320-337. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00425.x
42. MacCallum, R. C., Wegener, D. T., Uchino, B. N. and Fabrigar, L. R. 1993. The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1): 185-199. (doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.185)
43. MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Shang, S. and Hong, S. 1999. Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1): 84-99. (doi:10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84)
44. Nyikos, M. and Oxford, R. L. 1993. A factor analytic study of language-learning strategy use: Interpretations from information-processing theory and social psychology. Modern Language Journal, 77(1): 11-22. (doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1993.tb01940.x)
45. O'Malley, J. M. and Chamot, A. U. 1990. Learning strategies in second language acquisition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Oxford, R. L. 1989. Use of language learning strategies: A synthesis of studies with implications for strategy training. System, 17(2): 235-247. (doi:10.1016/0346-251X(89)90036-5)
47. Oxford, R. L. 1990. Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know, New York, NY: Newbury House.
48. Oxford, R. L. 2001. "Language learning strategies". In The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages, Edited by: Carter, R. and Nunan, D. 166-172. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. Oxford, R. and Burry-Stock, J. A. 1995. Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the strategy inventory for language learning (SILL). System, 23(1): 1-23. doi:10.1037/h0025178doi:10.1016/0346-251X(94)00047-A
50. Oxford, R. and Nyikos, M. 1989. Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. Modern Language Journal, 73(3): 291-300. doi:10.2307/327003
51. Palmer, J. D. 2007. Who is the authentic Korean American? Korean-born Korean American high school students' negotiations of ascribed and achieved identities. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 6(4): 277-298. doi:10.1080/15348450701542272
52. Park, G.-P. 1997. Language learning strategies and English proficiency in Korean university students. Foreign Language Annals, 30(2): 211-221. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1997.tb02343.x
53. Phakiti, A. 2003. A closer look at gender and strategy use in L2 reading. Language Learning, 53(4): 649-702. doi:10.1046/j.1467-9922.2003.00239.x
54. Pressley, M. 2002. "Metacognition and self-regulated comprehension". In What research has to say about reading instruction, Edited by: Farstrup, A. and Samuels, S. J. 291-309. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
55. Roberge, M. (2005, March). Working with Generation 1.5 student writers in college composition. Paper presented at the Conference on College Composition and Communication, San Francisco, CA.
56. Robson, G. and Midorikawa, H. 2001. How reliable and valid is the Japanese version of the strategy inventory for language learning (SILL)?. JALT Journal, 23(2): 202-226.
57. Rubin, J. 1981. Study of cognitive processes in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, II(2): 117-131. doi:10.1093/applin/II.2.117
58. Rubin, J. 1987. "Learner strategies: Theoretical assumptions, research history and typology". In Learner strategies in language learning, Edited by: Wenden, A. and Rubin, J. 15-30. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
59. Rumbaut, R.G., & Ima, K. (1988). The adaptation of Southeast Asian refugee youth: A comparative study (Final report to the Office of Resettlement). San Diego, CA: San Diego State University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED 299 372)
60. Skehan, P. 1991. Individual differences in second-language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13(2): 275-298. (doi:10.1017/S0272263100009979)
61. Sorensen, C. W. 1994. Success and education in South Korea. Comparative Education Review, 38(1): 10-35. (doi:10.1086/447223)
62. Stern, H. H. 1983. Fundamental concepts of language teaching, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
63. Stern, H. H. 1992. Issues and options in language teaching, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64. Tabachnick, B. G. and Fidell, L. S. 2001. Using multivariate statistics, 4, New York, NY: Harper Collins College.
65. Terrazas, A. 2009. Korean immigrants in the United States. Retrieved July 5, 2012, fromhttp://www.migrationinformation.org/USfocus/print.cfm?ID=716
66. US Census Bureau. (2008). United States-selected population profile in the United States. Retrieved July 5, 2012, fromhttp://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ACS_08_1YR_S0201&prodType=table
67. Vann, R. J. and Abraham, R. G. 1990. Strategies of unsuccessful learners. TESOL Quarterly, 24(2): 177-198. (doi:10.2307/3586898)
68. Velicer, W. F. and Fava, J. L. 1998. Effects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery. Psychological Methods, 3(2): 231-251. (doi:10.1037/1082-989X.3.2.231)
69. Watanabe, Y. (1990). External variables affecting language learning strategies of Japanese EFL learners: Effects of entrance examination, years spent at college/university, and staying overseas (Unpublished master's thesis). Lancaster University, UK.
70. Yang, N. D. 1999. The relationship between EFL learners' beliefs and learning strategy use. System, 27(4): 515-535. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00048-2
71. Zhang, L. J. 2001. Awareness in reading: EFL students' metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies in an acquisition-poor environment. Language Awareness, 10(4): 268-288. doi:10.1080/09658410108667039
72. Zhang, L. J. 2002. Exploring EFL reading as a metacognitive experience: Reader awareness and reading performance. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 12: 65-90.
73. Zhang, L. J. 2003. Research into Chinese EFL learner strategies: Methods, findings and instructional issues. RELC Journal, 34(3): 284-322. doi:10.1177/003368820303400303