An innovation funnel process for set-based conceptual design via DOE exploration, DEA selection and computer simulation

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 50, Issue 23, 2012, Pages 6792-6810

  Jeang, A ^a   Liang, Francois ^b  

^a FENG CHIA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b Department of Research and Development   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

ANSYS; conceptual design; DEA selection; DOE exploration; set base design

Indexed keywords

ANSYS; ANSYS SOFTWARE; CUSTOMER EXPECTATION; DEA SELECTION; DECISION-MAKING UNITS; DESIGN ALTERNATIVES; DESIGN PATTERNS; DETAILED DESIGN; DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE; FRONTIER ANALYSIS; MARKET UNCERTAINTY; PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS; PRODUCT PERFORMANCE; QUALITY LEVELS;

COMMERCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN;

EID: 84868578696     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: 1366588X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2011.625050     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. ANSYS, 1997. Element User's Guide. Canonsburg, PA: ANSYS. Avkiran, N.K. and Parker, B.R., 2010. Pushing the DEA research envelope. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 44 (1), 1-7.
2. Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., and Cooper, W.W., 1984. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30 (9), 1078-1092. (Pubitemid 14651320)
3. Bendsoe, M. and Kikuchi, N., 1988. Generating optimal topologies in optimal design using a homogenization method. Computer Method Applied Mechanical Engineering, 71 (2), 197-224.
4. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., and Rhodes, E.L., 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2 (6), 429-444. (Pubitemid 9402758)
5. Charnes, A., et al., 1985. Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. Journal of Econometrics, 30 (1-2), 91-107.
6. Charnes, A., et al., 1989. Cone ratio data envelopment analysis and multi-objective programming. International Journal of Systems Science, 20 (7), 1099-1118.
7. Charnes, A., et al., 1990. Polyhedral cone-ratio models with an application to large commercial banks. Journal of Econometrics, 46 (1-2), 73-91.
8. Cooper, W.W., et al., 1998. Chance constrained programming formulations for stochastic characterizations of efficiency and dominance in DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 9 (1), 53-79. (Pubitemid 128404641)
9. Cooper, W.W., et al., 2002. Chance constrained programming approaches to technical efficiencies and inefficiencies in stochastic data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53 (12), 1347-1356. (Pubitemid 35468889)
10. Cooper, W.W., Huang, Z.M., and Li, S.X., 1996. Satisficing DEA models under chance constraints. Annals of Operations Research, 66 (4), 279-295. (Pubitemid 126729290)
11. Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., and Tone, K., 2006. Introduction to data envelopment analysis and its uses with DEA-solver software and references. New York: Springer.
12. Del Prete, A., Mazzotta, D., and Anglani, A., 2010. Design optimization application in accordance with product and process requirements. Advances in Engineering Software, 41 (3), 427-432.
13. Emrouznejad, A., Parker, B.R., and Tavares, G., 2008. Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: a survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 42 (3), 151-157.
14. Herrin, W.E., Knight, J.R., and Sirmans, C.F., 2004. Pricing cutting behavior in residential markets. Journal of Housing Economics, 13 (3), 195-207. (Pubitemid 40256658)
15. Jeang, A., 2008. Combined parameter and tolerance design for quality via computer experiment: a design for thermo-electric micro-actuator. IEEE Transactions on Electronics Packaging Manufacturing, 31 (3), 192-201.
16. Jeang, A., Liang, F., and Chung, C.P., 2008. Robust product development for multiple quality characteristics using computer experiments and an optimization technique. International Journal of Production Research, 46 (12), 3415-3439. (Pubitemid 351568165)
17. Keeney, R.L. and Raiffa, H., 1993. Decisions with multiple objectives. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
18. Land, K.C., Lovell, C.A.K., and Thore, S., 1994. Productivity and efficiency under capitalism and state socialism: an empirical inquiry using chance-constrained data envelopment analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 46 (2), 139-152.
19. Malak Jr, R.J., et al., 2009. Multi-attribute utility analysis in set-based conceptual design. Computer-Aided Design, 41 (3), 214-227.
20. Marion, T.J. and Simpson, T.W., 2009. New product development practice application to an early-stage firm: the case of the Paper Pro-Stack Master. Design Studies, 30 (5), 561-587.
21. Montgomery, D.C., 2009. Design and analysis of experiments. New York: Wiley.
22. Nahm, Y.-E. and Ishikawa, H., 2006. Novel space-based design methodology for preliminary engineering design. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 28 (11-12), 1056-1070.
23. Olesen, O.B. and Petersen, N.C., 1995. Chance constrained efficiency evaluation. Management Science, 41 (3), 442-457.
24. Phadke, M.S., 1989. Quality engineering using robust design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25. Sobek, D.K., Ward, A.C., and Liker, J.K., 1999. Toyota's principles of set-based concurrent engineering. Sloan Management Review, 40 (2), 67-83.
26. Syan, C.S. and Menon, U., 1994. Concurrent engineering: concepts, implementation, and practice. New York: Chapman & Hall.
27. Tong, L.-I., Wang, C.-H., and Tsai, C.-W., 2008. Robust design for multiple dynamic quality characteristics using data envelopment analysis. Quality Reliability Engineering International, 24 (5), 557-571.
28. Ulrich, K.T. and Eppinger, S.D., 2008. Product design and development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
29. William, W.C., Lawrence, M.S., and Kaoru, T., 2000. Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
30. Wu, D. and Lee, C.-G., 2010. Stochastic DEA with ordinal data applied to a multi-attribute pricing problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 207 (3), 1679-1688.
31. Wu, D. and Olson, D.L., 2008. A comparison of stochastic dominance and stochastic DEA for vendor evaluation. International Journal of Production Research, 46 (8), 1-15.
32. Zeydan, M. and Colpan, C., 2009. A new decision support system for performance measurement using a combined fuzzy TOPSIS/DEA approach. International Journal of Production Research, 47 (15), 4327-4349.