Novel space-based design methodology for preliminary engineering design

International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

Volumn 28, Issue 11-12, 2006, Pages 1056-1070

  Nahm, Y E ^a   Ishikawa, H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ELECTRO COMMUNICATIONS   (Japan)

Author keywords

Fuzzy arithmetic; Measure of uncertainty; Robust and flexible design; Set based concurrent engineering; Simulation based design

Indexed keywords

FUZZY SETS; MAPPING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

FUZZY ARITHMETIC; MEASURE OF UNCERTAINTY; ROBUST AND FLEXIBLE DESIGN; SET-BASED CONCURRENT ENGINEERING; SIMULATION-BASED DESIGN;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 33646202272     PISSN: 02683768     EISSN: 14333015     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-004-2463-2     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Nagalingam SV, Lin GCI (1999) Latest developments in CIM. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 15:423-430
2. Prasad P (1996) Concurrent engineering fundamentals. Volume I: integrated product and process organization, and Volume II: integrated product development. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
3. Willaert SSA, De Graaf R. Minderhoud S (1998) Collaborative engineering: a case study of concurrent engineering in a wider context. J Eng Technol Manage 15:87-109
4. Sohek II DK. Ward AC, Liker JK (1999) Toyota's principles of set-based concurrent engineering. Sloan Manage Rev 40(2):67-83
5. Finch WW (1997) Predicate logic representations for design constraints on uncertainty supporting the set-based design paradigm. Dissertation. The University of Michigan
6. Ward AC, Liker JK, Cristiano JJ, Sobek II DK (1995) The second Toyota paradox: how delaying decisions can make better cars faster, Sloan Manage Rev 36(3):43-61
7. Liker JK, Sobek II DK, Ward AC, Cristiano JJ (1996) Involving suppliers in product development in the United States and Japan: evidence for set-based concurrent engineering. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 43(2): 165-178
8. Sobek II DK, Ward AC (1996) Principles of Toyota's set-based concurrent engineering process. In: Proc ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference (DETC'96), Irvine, CA, USA
9. Esterman M. Ishii K (1999) Challenges in robust concurrent product development across the supply chain. In: Proc ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference (DETC'99), Las Vegas, NV, USA
10. Wood KL, Antonsson EK (1989) Computations with imprecise parameters in engineering design: background and theory. ASME J Mech Transmiss, Automat Des 111(4):616-625
11. Antonsson EK, Otto KN (1995) Imprecision in engineering design. Trans ASME J Mech Des 117(B):25-32
12. Otto KN, Antonsson EK (1991) Trade-off strategies in engineering design. Res Eng Des 3(2):87-104
13. Otto KN, Antonsson EK (1993) Tuning parameters in engineering design. Trans ASME J Mech Des 115(1): 14-19
14. Scott M.I. Antonsson EK (1998) Aggregation functions for engineering design trade-offs. Fuzzy Sets Syst 99(3):253-264
15. Scott MJ (1999) Formalizing negotiation in engineering design. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, California Institute of Technology
16. Ward AC (1989) A theory of quantitative inference for artificial sets, applied to a mechanical design compiler. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
17. Ward AC, Lozano-Perez T, Seering WP (1990) Extending the constraint propagation of intervals. AI EDAM 4(1):47-54
18. Habib W. Ward AC (1991) In pursuit of a design mathematics: generalizing the labeled interval calculus. In: Proceedings of ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference (DTM'91), Miami Beach, USA
19. Finch WW. Ward AC (1995) Generalized set-propagation operations over relations of more than three variables. AI EDAM 9:231-242
20. Finch WW, Ward AC (1996) Quantified relations: a class of predicate logic design constraints among sets of manufacturing, operating and other variables. In: Proceedings of AS ME Design Engineering Technical Conference (DETC'96). Irvine, C'A, USA
21. Finch WW, Ward AC (1997) A set-based system for eliminating infeasible design in engineering problems dominated by uncertainty. In: Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference (DETC'97), Sacramento, CA, USA
22. Taguchi G (1987) Systems of experimental design. UNIPUB/Kraus International Publications, New York
23. Phadke MS (1989) Quality engineering using robust design. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
24. Chen W. Allen JK, Tsui KL, Mistree F (1996) A procedure for robust design: minimizing variations caused by noise factors and control factors. Transactions of the ASME J Mech Des 118:478-485
25. Chen W, Allen JK, Mistree F (1997) A robust concept exploration method for enhancing productivity in concurrent system design. Concurrent Engineering: Res Appl 5(3):203-217
26. Simpson TW, Allen JK, Mistree F, Chen W (1997) Designing ranged sets of top-level design specifications for a family of aircraft: an application of design capability indices. In: Proceedings of SAH World Aviation Congress and Exposition, Anaheim, CA, USA
27. Chen W, Yuan C (1999) A probabilistic-based design model for achieving flexibility in design. Trans ASME J Mech Des 121(1):77-83
28. Wallace DR. Jakiela MJ, Flowers WC (1996) Design search under probabilistic specifications using genetic algorithms. CAD 28(5): 405-421
29. Mistree F, Hughes OF, Bras A (1993) The compromise decision support problem and the adaptive linear programming algorithm. Structural Optimization: Status and Promise, AIAA. Washington D.C.
30. Hanss M (2002) The transformation method for the simulation and analysis of systems with uncertain parameters. Fuzzy Sets Syst 130:277-289
31. Dong WM, Wong FS (1987) Fuzzy weighted averages and implementation of the extension principle. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 21(2): 183-199
32. Dong W, Shah H (1987) Vertex method for computing functions on fuzzy variables. Fuzzy Sets Syst 24:65-78
33. Kirschman CF, Fadel GM (1997) Customer metrics for the selection of generic forms at the conceptual stage of mechanical design. In: Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference (DETC'97), Sacramento, CA, USA
34. Parunak HVD, Ward AC, Sauter J (1999) The MarCon algorithm: a systematic market approach to distributed constraint problems. AI EDAM 13(3):217-234
35. Nahm, YE, Ishikawa H (2005) Representing and aggregating engineering quantities for set-based concurrent engineering. Concurrent Eng: Res Appl 13(2):123-133
36. Wood KE, Antonsson EK, Beck JL (1989) Comparing fuzzy and probability calculus for representing imprecision in preliminary engineering design. In: Proceedings of ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference (DTM'89), Montreal, Canada
37. Eu SCY, Bukkapatnam STS, Ge P, Wang N (1999) Backward mapping methodology for design synthesis. In: Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference (DETC99), Eas Vegas, NV, USA
38. Nahm, YE, Ishikawa H (accepted) A new 3D-CAD system for set-based parametric design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol
39. Montgomery D (1991) Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley, New York
40. Lu SCY, Ge P, Wang N (1998) Application of an evolutionary modeling approach to automotive bumper system design and analysis. In: Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference (DETC'98), Atlanta, GA USA
41. Ge P, Wang N (2000) DoE study in building surrogate models for complex systems. In: Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference (DETC2000), Baltimore, ML, USA
42. Simpson TW, Peplinski J. Koch PN, Allen JK (2001) Metamodels for computer-based engineering design: survey and recommendations. Eng Comput 17(2):129-150
43. Nakazawa H (1985) Information integration method. Design Synthesis and Analysis, Elsevier, North-Holland
44. Suh NP (1990) The principles of design. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
45. Zimmermann HJ (2001) Fuzzy set theory and its applications. Kluwer, New York
46. Luoh L, Wang WJ (2000) A modified entropy for general fuzzy sets. Int J Fuzzy Syst 2(4):300-304
47. Simpson TW, Mauery TM, Korte JJ, Mistree F (2001) Kriging models for global approximation in simulation-based multidisciplinary design optimization. AIAA J 39(12):2233-2241
48. Jin R, Chen W. Simpson TW (2001) Comparative studies of metamodeling techniques under multiple modeling criteria. Struct Multidiscip Optim 23(1): 1-13
49. Kearfott B, Kreinovich V (1996) Applications of interval computations. Kluwer, New York
50. Hyvonen E, de Pascale S (2000) A new basis for spreadsheet computing: interval solver for Microsoft Excel. AI Mag 21(4):83-92