The implications of climate change scenario selection for future streamflow projection in the Upper Colorado River Basin

Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

Volumn 16, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 3989-4007

  Harding, B L ^a   Wood, A W ^b   Prairie, J R ^c  

^a AMEC FOSTER WHEELER   (United States)

^b NOAA EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^c U S BUREAU OF RECLAMATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE SCENARIOS; CLIMATE CONDITION; CLIMATE SCENARIOS; COLORADO RIVER BASIN; FUTURE CLIMATE; GLOBAL CLIMATE MODEL; HYDROLOGY MODELS; IMPACT ANALYSIS; MACRO SCALE; MEDIA COVERAGE; MULTI-MODEL ENSEMBLE; ON FLOW; SIMULATED EVOLUTIONS;

CLIMATE CHANGE; STREAM FLOW; WATERSHEDS;

CLIMATE MODELS;

CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE CONDITIONS; CLIMATE MODELING; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; PRECIPITABLE WATER; PRECIPITATION (CLIMATOLOGY); RIVER BASIN; STREAMFLOW;

COLORADO BASIN [NORTH AMERICA];

EID: 84868576809     PISSN: 10275606     EISSN: 16077938     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/hess-16-3989-2012     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Anderson, J., Chung, F., Anderson, M., Brekke, L., Easton, D., Ejeta, M., Peterson, R., and Snyder, R.: Progress on Incorporating Climate Change into Management of California's Water Resources, in: Climatic Change, Springer, The Netherlands, 89, Supplement 1, 91-108, 2008.
2. Backlund, P., Janetos, A., Schimel, D., Hatfield, J., Boote, K., Fay, P., Hahn, L., Izaurralde, C., Kimball, B. A., Mader, T., Morgan, J., Ort, D., Polley, W., Thomson, A., Wolfe, D., Ryan, M. G., Archer, S. R., Birdsey, R., Dahm, C., Heath, L., Hicke, J., Hollinger, D., Huxman, T., Okin, G., Oren, R., Randerson, J., Schlesinger, W., Lettenmaier, D., Major, D., Poff, L., Running, S., Hansen, L., Inouye, D., Kelly, B. P., Meyerson, L., Peterson, B., and Shaw, R.: The effects of climate change on agriculture, land resources, water resources, and biodiversity in the United States, A Report by the US Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., USA, 362 pp., 2008.
3. Barnett, T. P., Adam, J. C., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions, Nature, 438, 303-309, 2005.
4. Barnett, T., Pierce, D. W., Hidalgo, H., Bonfils, C., Santer, B. D., Das, T., Bala, G., Wood, A. W., Nazawa, T., Mirin, A., Cayan, D., and Dettinger, M.: Human-induced changes in the hydrology of the western United States, Science, 319, 1080-1083, doi:10.1126/science.1152538, 2008.
5. Barsugli, J., Anderson, C., Smith, J., and Vogel, J.: Options for Improving Climate Modeling to Assist Water Utility Planning for Climate Change, Water Utility Climate Alliance, San Francisco, California, 2009.
6. Brekke, L. D., Dettinger, M. D., Maurer, E. P., and Anderson, M.: Significance of model credibility in estimating climate projection distributions for regional hydroclimatological risk assessments, Climatic Change, 89, 371-394, 2008.
7. Christensen, N. S. and Lettenmaier, D. P.: A multimodel ensemble approach to assessment of climate change impacts on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River Basin, Hy-drol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 1417-1434, doi:10.5194/hess-11-1417-2007, 2007.
8. Christensen, N. S., Wood, A. W., Voisin, N., and Lettenmaier, D.: The Effects of Climate Change on the Hydrology and Water Resources of the Colorado River basin, Climatic Change, 62, 337-363, 2004.
9. Deser, C., Phillips, A., Bourdette, V., and Teng, H.: Uncertainty in climate change projections: the role of internal variability, Clim. Dynam., 38, 527-546, doi:10.1007/s00382-010-0977-x, 2012.
10. Gleckler, P. J., Taylor, K. E., and Doutraiaux, C.: Performance metrics for climate models, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D06104, doi:10.1029/2007JD008972, 2008.
11. Hawkins, E. and Sutton, R.: The potential to narrow uncertainty in projections of regional precipitation change, Clim. Dynam., 37, 407-418, doi:10.1007/s00382-010-0810-6, 2011.
12. Hayhoe, K., Cayan, D., Field, C., Frumhoff, P. C., Maurer, E. P., Miller, N. L., Moser, S. C., Schneider, S. H., Cahill, K. N., Cle-land, E. E., Dale, L., Drapek, R., Hanemann, R. M., Kalkstein, L. S., Lenihan, J., Lunch, C. K., Neilson, R. P., Sheridan, S. C., and Verville, J. H.: Emissions pathways, climate change, and impacts on California, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 101, 12422-12427, 2004.
13. Liang, S., Lettenmaier, D. P., Wood, E. F., and Burges, S. J.: A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 14415-14428, 1994.
14. Liang, S., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Wood, E. F.: One-Dimensional Statistical Dynamic Representation of Subgrid Spatial Variability of Precipitation in the Two-Layer Variable Infiltration Capacity Model, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 21403-21422, 1996.
15. Lohmann, D., Raschke, E., Nijssen, B., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Regional Scale Hydrology: I. Formulation of the VIC-2L Model Coupled to a Routing Model, Hydrol. Sci., 43, 131-142, 1998a.
16. Lohmann, D., Raschke, E., Nijssen, B., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Regional Scale Hydrology: II. Application of the VIC-2L Model to the Weser River, Germany, Hydrol. Sci., 43, 143-158, 1998b.
17. Maurer, E. P.: Uncertainty in hydrologic impacts of climate change in the Sierra Nevada, California under two emissions scenarios, Climatic Change, 82, 309-325, 2007.
18. Maurer, E. P. and Hidalgo, H. G.: Utility of daily vs. monthly large-scale climate data: an intercomparison of two statistical downscaling methods, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 551-563, doi:10.5194/hess-12-551-2008, 2008.
19. Maurer, E. P., Wood, A. W., Adam, J. C., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Nijssen, B.: A long-term hydrologically-based data set of land surface fluxes and states for the conterminous United States, J. Climate, 15, 3237-3251, 2002.
20. Maurer, E. P., Brekke, L., Pruitt, T., and Duffy, P. B.: Fine-resolution climate projections enhance regional climate change impact studies, EOS Trans. AGU, 88, 504, 2007a.
21. Maurer, E. P., Stewart, I. T., Bonfils, C., Duffy, P. B., and Cayan, D.: Detection, attribution, and sensitivity of trends toward earlier streamflow in the Sierra Nevada, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D11118, doi:10.1029/2006JD008088, 2007b.
22. Maurer, E. P., Adam, J. C., and Wood, A. W.: Climate model based consensus on the hydrologic impacts of climate change to the Rio Lempa basin of Central America, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 183-194, doi:10.5194/hess-13-183- 2009, 2009.
23. Meehl, G. A., Goddard, L., Murphy, J., Stouffer, R. J., Boer, G., Danabasoglu, G., Dixon, K., Giorgetta, M. A., Greene, A., Hawkins, E., Hegerl, G., Karoly, D., Keenlyside, N., Kimoto, M., Kirtman, B., Navarra, A., Pulwarty, R., Smith, D., Stammer, D., and Stockdale, T.: Decadal prediction: Can it be skillful?, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 90, 1467-1485, doi:10.1175/2009BAMS2778.1, 2009.
24. Milly, P. C. D., Dunne, K. A., and Vecchia, A. V.: Global pattern of trends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate, Nature, 438, 347-350, 2005.
25. Milly, P. C. D., Betancourt, J., Falkenmark, M., Hirsch, R., Kundzewicz, Z., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Stouffer, R. J.: Station-arity Is Dead: Whither Water Management?, Science, 319, 573-574, 2008.
26. Mitchell, K. E., Lohmann, D., Houser, P. R., Wood, E. F., Schaake, J. C., Robock, A., Cosgrove, B. A., Sheffield, J., Duan, Q., Luo, L., Higgins, R. W., Pinker, R. T., Tarpley, J. D., Lettenmaier, D. P., Marshall, C. H., Entin, J. K., Pan, M., Shi, W., Koren, V., Meng, J., Ramsay, B. H., and Bailey, A. A.: The multi-institution North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS): Utilizing multiple GCIP products and partners in a continental distributed hydrological modeling system, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D07S90, doi:10.1029/2003JD003823, 2004.
27. Nakicenovic, N., Davidson, O., Davis, G., Grübler, A., Kram, T., Lebre La Rovere, E., Metz, B., Morita, T., Pepper, W., Pitcher, H., Sankovski, A., Shukla, P., Swart, R., Watson, R., and Dadi, Z. (Eds.): Emissions Scenarios, A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, 599 pp., 2000.
28. Nash, L. L. and Gleick, P. H.: The Sensitivity of Streamflow in the Colorado River basin to Climatic Changes, J. Hydrol., 125, 221-241, 1991.
29. Nijssen, B., O'Donnel, G. M., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Predicting the Discharge of Global Rivers, J. Climate, 14, 3307-3323, 2001.
30. Painter, T. H., Barrett, A. P., Landry, C. C., Neff, J. C., Cassidy, M. P., Lawrence, C. R., McBride, K. E., and Farmer, G. L.: Impact of disturbed desert soils on duration of mountain snow cover, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L12502, doi:10.1029/2007GL030284, 2007.
31. Painter, T. H., Deems, J. S., Belnap, J., Hamlet, A. F., Landry, C. C., and Udall, B.: Response of Colorado River runoff to dust radiative forcing in snow, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 107, 17125-17130, 2010.
32. Payne, J. T., Wood, A. W., Hamlet, A. F., Palmer, R. N., and Let-tenmaier, D. P.: Mitigating the effects of climate change on the water resources of the Columbia River basin, Climatic Change, 62, 233-256, 2004.
33. Pennell, C. and Reichler, T.: On the Effective Number of Climate Models, J. Climate, 24, 2358-2367, doi:10.1175/2010JCLI3814.1, 2011.
34. Pierce, D. W., Barnett, T. P., Santer, B. D., and Gleckler, P. J.: Selecting global climate models for regional climate change studies, P. Nat. Acadl. Sci. USA, 106, 8441-8446, 2009.
35. Prairie, J. and Callejo, R.: Natural Flow and Salt Computation Methods, Calendar Years 1971-1995, US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Salt Lake City, Utah, 122 pp., 2005.
36. Reclamation: Sensitivity of Future CVP/SWP Operations to Potential Climate Change and Associated Sea Level Rise, Appendix R in Biological Assessment on the Continued Long-term Operations of the Central Valley Project and the State Water Project, prepared by Bureau of Reclamation, US Department of the Interior, Sacramento, California, 134 pp., 2008.
37. Reclamation: Colorado River Basin Natural Flow and Salt Data, http://www.usbr.gov/lc/region/g4000/NaturalFlow/index. html, last access: 2 April 2009.
38. Reclamation: Climate Change and Hydrology Scenarios for Oklahoma Yield Studies, Bureau of Reclamation, US Department of the Interior, Denver, Colorado, 2010.
39. Reclamation: Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study, Interim Report No. 1, Status Report, Bureau of Reclamation, US Department of the Interior, Boulder City, Nevada, 2011a.
40. Reclamation: Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study, Interim Report No. 1, Technical Report B-Water Supply Assessment, Bureau of Reclamation, US Department of the Interior, Boulder City, Nevada, 2011b.
41. Reclamation: West-Wide Climate Risk Assessments: Bias-Corrected and Spatially Downscaled Surface Water Projections, Bureau of Reclamation, US Department of the Interior, Denver, Colorado, 2011c.
42. Revelle, R. R. and Waggoner, P. E.: Effects of a Carbon Dioxide Induced Climatic Change on Water Supplies in the Western United States, in: Changing Climate, National Academy of Sciences Press, Washington, D.C., 1983.
43. Sankarasubramanian, A., Vogel, R. M., and Limbrunner, J. F.: Climate elasticity of streamflow in the United States, Water Resour. Res., 37, 1771-1781, 2001.
44. Santer, B. D., Taylor, K. E., Gleckler, P. J., Bonfils, C., Barnett, T. P., Pierce, D. W., Wigley, T. M. L., Mears, C., Wentz, F. J., Brüggemann, W., Gillett, N. P., Klein, S. A., Solomon, S. P., Stott, A., and Wehner, M. F.: Incorporating model quality information in climate change detection and attribution studies, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 106, 14778-14783 2009.
45. Seager, R. M. and Vecchi, G. A.: Greenhouse warming and the 21st Century hydroclimate of southwestern North America, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 107, 21277-21282, 2010.
46. Seager, R., Ting, M., Held, I., Kushnir, Y., Lu, J., Vecchi, G., Huang, H., Harnik, N., Leetmaa, A., Lau, N., Li, C., Velez, J., and Naik, N.: Model Projections of an Imminent Transition to a More Arid Climate in Southwestern North America, Science, 10, 1126, doi:0.1126/science.1139601, 2007.
47. Stainforth, D. A., Downing, T. E., Washington, R., Lopez, A., and New, M.: Issues in the interpretation of climate model ensembles to inform decisions Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 365, 2163-2177, 2007.
48. Stockton, C. W. and Boggess, W. R.: Geohydrological implications of climate change on water resource development, Final Report, US Army Coastal Engineering Research Center, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, p. 224, 1979.
49. Tebaldi, C. and Knutti, R.: The use of the multi-model ensemble in probabilistic climate projections, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 365, 2053-2075, doi:10.1098/rsta.2007.2076, 2007.
50. Tebaldi, C., Mearns, L. O., Hychka, D., and Smith, R. L.: Regional probabilities of precipitation change; A Bayesian analysis of multimodel simulations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L24213, doi:10.1029/2004GL021276, 2004.
51. Van Rheenen, N. T., Wood, A. W., Palmer, R. N., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Potential implications of PCM climate change scenarios for Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin hydrology and water resources, Climatic Change, 62, 257-281, 2004.
52. Wilby, R. L.: Evaluating climate model outputs for hydrological applications, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 55, 1090-1093, 2010.
53. Wilby, R. L. and Harris, I.: A framework for assessing uncertainties in climate change impacts: Low-flow scenarios for the River Thames, UK, Water Resour. Res., 42, W02419, doi:10.1029/2005WR004065, 2006.
54. Wood, E. F., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Zartarian, V. G.: A Land-Surface Hydrology Parameterization with Subgrid Variability for General Circulation Models, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 2717-2728, 1992.
55. Wood, A. W. and Lettenmaier, D. P.: A testbed for new seasonal hy-drologic forecasting approaches in the western U.S., B. Am. Me-teorol. Soc., 87, 1699-1712, doi:10.1175/BAMS-87-12-1699, 2006.
56. Wood, A. W., Maurer, E. P., Kumar, A., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Long-range experimental hydrologic forecasting for the eastern United States, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, 4429, doi:10.1029/2001jd000659, 2002.
57. Wood, A. W., Leung, L. R., Sridhar, V., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Hy-drologic implications of dynamical and statistical approaches to downscaling climate model outputs, Climatic Change, 15, 189-216, 2004.
58. Wood, A. W., Kumar, A., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: A retrospective assessment of climate model-based ensemble hydrologic forecasting in the western U.S., J. Geophys. Res., 110, D04105, doi:10.1029/2004JD004508, 2005.
59. WCRP-World Climate Research Programme's: Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 3 (CMIP3) multi-model dataset, Archive of downscaled climate projections; served at: http://gdo-dcp.ucllnl.org/downscaled cmip3 projections/, last access: 22 April 2009.