An efficient remote sensing solution to update the NCWI

Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing

Volumn 78, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 537-547

  Stein, Beth R ^a   Zheng, Baojuan ^a   Kokkinidis, Loannis ^a   Kayastha, Nilam ^a   Seigler, Taylor ^a   Gökkaya, Kemal ^a   Gopalakrishnan, Ranjith ^a   Hwang, Won Hoi ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVANCED SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADARS; AERIAL IMAGES; CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; COASTAL WETLANDS; COMMON REED; COST-EFFICIENT; DATA SETS; DECISION TREE ANALYSIS; EAST COAST; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; FIELD SURVEYS; GEOGRAPHIC DATABASE; HYPERSPECTRAL DATA; INTEGRATED APPROACH; INVASIVE SPECIES; INVENTORY DATA; LANDSAT; LANDSAT SATELLITE; LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING; MATCHED FILTERING; MULTI-TEMPORAL; NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; OBJECT BASED; OMISSION ERRORS; PHRAGMITES AUSTRALIS; RADAR DATA; RESOURCE MANAGERS; SPATIAL EXTENT;

ATMOSPHERICS; CONSERVATION; DECISION TREES; ECOSYSTEMS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT; OPTICAL RADAR; REMOTE SENSING; RESEARCH; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SOIL SURVEYS; SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR;

WETLANDS;

COASTAL WETLAND; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; GRASS; INVASIVE SPECIES; LANDSAT; LIDAR; NATURAL RESOURCE; REMOTE SENSING; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; SATELLITE DATA; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR;

ATLANTIC COAST [NORTH AMERICA]; ATLANTIC COAST [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

PHRAGMITES AUSTRALIS;

EID: 84868564237     PISSN: 00991112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Artigas, F.J., and J.S. Yang, 2005. Hyperspectral remote sensing of marsh species and plant vigour gradient in the New Jersey Meadowlands, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(23):5209-5220.
2. Baghdadi, N., M. Bernier, R. Gauthier, and I. Neeson, 2001. Evaluation of C-band SAR data for wetlands mapping, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(1):71-88.
3. Carle, M.V., 2011. Estimating wetland losses and gains in coastal North Carolina, Wetlands, 31(6):1275-1285.
4. Carreño, M.F., M.A. Esteve, J. Martinez, J.A. Palazón, and M.T. Pardo, 2008. Habitat changes in coastal wetlands associated to hydrological changes in the wetland, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 77(3):475-483.
5. Center for Coastal Resources Management, 2012. Tidal Marsh Inventory, URL: http://ccrm.vims.edu/gis_data_maps/static_maps/gis/tmi.html, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester Point, Virginia (last date accessed 15 December 2011).
6. Chust, G., I. Galparsoro, A. Borja, J. Franco, and A. Uriarte, 2008. Coastal and estuarine habitat mapping, using LIDAR height and intensity and multi-spectral imagery, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 78(4):633-643.
7. CMI, 2011. Updated Wetland Maps for 18 Coastal Refuges, Virginia Tech website, URL: http://cmi.vt.edu/Articles/art_RefugeNWI. html, Conservation Management Institute at Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia (last date accessed: 2 February 2012).
8. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, E.T. Laroe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C.
9. Dahl, T.E., and M.D. Watmough, 2007. Current approaches to wetland status and trends monitoring in prairie Canada and the continental United States of America, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 33(S1):S17-S27.
10. Dooley, E. E., 2005. Millennium ecosystem assessment, Environmental health perspectives, 113(9):A591-A591.
11. ESA, 2012a. ASAR, Earthnet Online, URL: https://earth.esa.int/web/guest/missions/esa-operational-eo-missions/env isat/instruments/asar, European Space Agency, Paris, France (last date accessed: 2 February 2012).
12. ESA, 2012b. CHRIS, Earthnet Online, URL: https://earth.esa.int/web/guest/missions/esa-operational-eo-missions/pro ba/instruments/chris, European Space Agency, Paris, France (last date accessed: 2 February 2012).
13. Fry, J., G. Xian, S. Jin, J. Dewitz, C. Homer, L. Yang, C. Barnes, N. Herold, and J. Wickham, 2011. Completion of the 2006 National Land Cover Database for the Conterminous United States, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 77(9):858-864.
14. Galbraith, J.M., P.F. Donovan, K.M. Smith, and C.E. Zipper, 2003. Using GIS to predict wetland occurrence, Soil Science, 168(8):563-575.
15. Grenier, M., A.M. Demers, S. Labrecque, M. Benoit, R.A. Fournier, and B. Drolet, 2007. An object-based method to map wetland using RADARSAT-1 and Landsat ETM images: test case on two sites in Quebec, Canada, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 33(S1):S28-S45.
16. He, K.S., D. Rocchini, M. Neteler, and H. Nagendra, 2011. Benefits of hyperspectral remote sensing for tracking plant invasions, Diversity and Distributions, 17:381-392.
17. Henderson, F. M., and A. J. Lewis, 2008. Radar detection of wetland ecosystems: a review, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(20):5809-5835.
18. Hurd, J.D., D.I. Civco, E.H. Wilson, and C.L. Arnold, 2009. Coastal area land-cover change analysis for Connecticut, Remote Sensing of Coastal Environments (Y. Wang, editor), CRC Press, Boca Raton, F.L., pp. 333-353.
19. Kasischke, E.S., J.M. Melack, and M.C. Dobson, 1997. The use of imaging radars for ecological applications-A review, Remote Sensing of Environment, 59(2):141-156.
20. Kesgin, B., and E. Nurlu, 2009. Land cover changes on the coastal zone of Candarli Bay, Turkey using remotely sensed data, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 157(1-4):89-96.
21. Laba, M., R. Downs, S. Smith, S. Welsh, C. Neider, S. White, M. Richmond, W. Philpot, and P. Baveye, 2008. Mapping invasive wetland plants in the Hudson River National Estuarine Research Reserve using quickbird satellite imagery, Remote Sensing of Environment, 112(1):286-300.
22. Lang, M.W., and G.W. McCarty, 2008. Remote sensing data for regional wetland mapping in the United States: trends and future prospects, Wetlands: Ecology, Conservation and Restoration (R.E. Russo, editor), Nova Science Publishers, Inc., New York, N.Y., pp. 73-112.
23. Lang, M.W., and G.W. McCarty, 2009. Lidar intensity for improved detection of inundation below the forest canopy, Wetlands, 29(4):1166-1178.
24. Lu, S., S. Funakoshi, Y. Shimizu, J. Ishii, A.M. de Asis, M. Ajima, I. Washitani, and K. Omasa, 2006. Estimation of plant abundance and distribution of Miscanthus sacchariflorus and Phragmites australis using matched filtering of hyperspectral image, Eco-Engineering, 18(2):65-70.
25. Lunetta, R. S., R. G. Congalton, L. K. Fenstermaker, J. R. Jensen, K. C. McGwire, and L. R. Tinney, 1991. Remote sensing and geographic information system data integration: error sources and research issues, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 57:677-687.
26. Maxa, M., and P. Bolstad, 2007. Mapping northern wetlands with high resolution satellite images and LiDAR, Wetlands, 29(1):248-260.
27. Moore, I.D., P.E. Gessler, G.A. Nielsen, and G.A. Peterson, 1993. Soil attribute prediction using terrain analysis, Soil Science Society of America Journal, 57(2):443-452.
28. MRLC, 2011. National Land Cover Database 2006, URL: http://www. mrlc.gov/nlcd06_data.php, Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium, Sioux Falls, South Dakota (last date accessed: 16 February 2012).
29. Murphy, P.N.C., J. Ogilvie, and P. Arp, 2009. Topographic modeling of soil moisture conditions: a comparison and verification of two models, European Journal of Soil Science, 60(1):94-109.
30. National Research Council, 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and Boundaries, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 328 pp.
31. NOAA, 2000. National Coastal Wetlands Inventory; Distribution and Abundance of Wetlands in Coastal Regions of the Contiguous United States; NOAA/NOS, URL: ftp://www.msp.noaa.gov/pub/metadata/metadata_archive_20080731/NOS_Metada ta/NOPUB/NOPUB_37.htm, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Greenbelt, Maryland (last date accessed: 22 February 2012).
32. NOAA Coastal Services Center, 2012. Coastal Change Analysis Program Regional Land Cover, Digital Coast, URL: http://www.csc. noaa.gov/digitalcoast/data/ccapregional/, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Charleston, South Carolina (last date accessed: 3 February 2012).
33. NCDOT, 2007. NCDOT GIS Contour and Elevation Data, Data Distribution, URL: http://www.ncdot.org/it/gis/DataDistribution/ContourElevationData/, North Carolina Department of Transportation, Raleigh, North Carolina (last date accessed: 3 February 2012).
34. NCGICC, 2012. NC OneMap GeoSpatial Portal, URL: http://data.nconemap. com/geoportal/, North Carolina Geographic Information Coordinate Council, Raleigh, North Carolina (last date accessed: 10 February 2012).
35. NRCS, 2011. Geospatial Data Gateway, URL: http://datagateway.nrcs. usda.gov/, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Jackson, Mississippi (last date accessed: 13 January 2012).
36. Ozesmi, S. L., and M. E. Bauer, 2002. Satellite remote sensing of wetlands, Wetlands Ecology and Management, 10(5):381-402.
37. Parker Williams, A., and E.R. Hunt, 2002. Estimation of leafy spurge cover from hyperspectral imagery using mixture tuned matched filtering, Remote Sensing of Environment, 82:446-456.
38. Pengra, B.W., C.A. Johnston, and T.R. Loveland, 2007. Mapping an invasive plant, Phragmites australis, in coastal wetlands using the EO-1 Hyperion hyperspectral sensor, Remote Sensing of Environment, 108(1):74-81.
39. Richardson, M.C., M.J. Fortin, and B.A. Branfireun, 2009. Hydrogeomorphic edge detection and delineation of landscape functional units from lidar digital elevation models, Water Resources Research, 45.
40. Schmid, T., J. Gumuzzio, M. Rodríguez, and M. Koch, 2010. Application of hyperspectral spaceborne data to identify sensitive wetland areas of Central Spain, Proceedings of the Hyperspectral 2010 Workshop, 17-19 March 2010, Frascati, Italy (ESA SP-683).
41. Schoeneberger, P.J., D.A. Wysocki, E.C. Benham, and W.D. Broderson, 2002. Field book for describing and sampling soils, version 2.0, Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, NE.
42. Sørensen, R., and J. Seibert, 2007. Effects of DEM resolution on the calculation of topographical indices: TWI and its components, Journal of Hydrology, 347(1-2):79-89.
43. Sørensen, R., U. Zinko, and J. Seibert, 2006. On the calculation of the topographic wetness index: evaluation of different methods based on field observations, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 10:101-112.
44. Stolt, M.H., and J.C. Baker, 1995. Evaluation of National Wetland Inventory maps to inventory wetlands in the southern Blue Ridge of Virginia. Wetlands, 15(4):346-353.
45. Sutter, L., 1999. DCM Wetland Mapping in Coastal North Carolina, URL: http://dcm2.enr.state.nc.us/wetlands/WTYPEMAPDOC.pdf, North Carolina Division of Coastal Management, Morehead City, North Carolina (last date accessed: 2 February 2012).
46. Tiner, R.W., 1999. Wetland indicators: a guide to wetland identification, delineation, classification, and mapping, CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, Florida, 424 pp.
47. Töyrä, J., A. Pietroniro, L.W. Martz, and T.D. Prowse, 2002. A multisensor approach to wetland flood monitoring, Hydrological Processes, 16:1569-1581.
48. Underwood, E., S. Ustin, and D. DiPietro, 2003. Mapping nonnative plants using hyperspectral imagery, Remote Sensing of Environment, 86(2):150-161.
49. U.S. BLS, 2011. May 2010 State Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates, URL: http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_va.htm, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, District of Columbia
50. U.S. FWS, 2011. National Wetlands Inventory, URL: http://www.fws. gov/wetlands/, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, District of Columbia (last date accessed 3 February 2012).
51. U.S. FWS Northeast Region, 2011. NWI Overview, National Wetlands Inventory, URL: http://www.fws.gov/northeast/wetlands/overview_nwi.html, U.S. Department of the Interior, Hadley, Massachusetts (last date accessed: 3 February 2012).
52. USGS EROS, 2010. Landsat: A Global Land-Imaging Project, USGS Publications Warehouse, URL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2010/3026/pdf/FS2010-3026.pdf, U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Observation Systems, Sioux Falls, South Dakota (last date accessed: 7 January 2012).
53. Werner, H.W., 2004. Accuracy assessment of National Wetland Inventory maps at Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks, Park Science, 23(1).
54. Whitcomb, J., M. Moghaddam, K. McDonald, J. Kellndorfer, and E. Podest, 2009. Mapping vegetated wetlands of Alaska using Lband radar satellite data, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 35(1):54-72.
55. Wilen, B.O., and M.K. Bates, 1995. The US Fish and Wildlife Service's National Wetlands Inventory Project, Vegetatio, 118(1-2):153-169.
56. Wright, C., and A. Gallant, 2007. Improved wetland remote sensing in Yellowstone National Park using classification trees to combine TM imagery and ancillary environmental data, Remote Sensing of Environment, 107(4):582-605.