Coastal area land-cover change analysis for Connecticut

English Remote Sensing of Coastal Environments

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 333-354

  Hurd, James D ^a   Civco, Daniel L ^a   Wilson, Emily H ^a   Arnold, Chester L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84868567471     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (14)

1. Bank of America, 1995, Beyond Sprawl: New Patterns of Growth to Fit the New California, Bank of America Environmental Polices and Programs, San Francisco, CA, 11pp.
2. Sierra Club, 1997, Sprawl Costs us All: A Guide to the Costs of Sprawl and How to Create Livable Communities in Maryland, Sierra Club Foundation, Annapolis, MD, 16pp.
3. Koeln, G. and Bissonnette, J., 2000, Cross-correlation analysis: Mapping landcover change with a historic landcover database and a recent, single-date multispectral image, in Proceedings of the 2000 ASPRS Annual Convention, Washington, DC.
4. Smith, F.G.F., Herold, N., Jones, T., and Sheffield, C., 2002, Evaluation of cross- correlation analysis, a semi-automated change detection, for updating of an existing landcover classification, in Proceedings of the 2002 ASPRS Annual Convention, Washington, DC.
5. Story, M. and Congalton, R.G., 1986, Accuracy assessment: A user’s perspective, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 52(3): 397–399.
6. Congalton, R.G., Oderwald, R.G., and Mead, R.A., 1983, Assessing Landsat classifica- tion accuracy using discrete multivariate analysis statistical techniques, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 49(12): 1671–1678.
7. Fung, T. and LeDrew, E., 1988, The determination of optimal threshold levels for change detection using various accuracy indices, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 54(10): 1449–2454.
8. Schueler, T.R., 1994, The Importance of Imperviousness, Watershed Protection Techniques, 1(3): 100–111.
9. Arnold, C.L. and Gibbons, C.J., 1996, Impervious surface coverage: The emergence of a key environmental indicator, Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(2): 3243–258.
10. Brabec, E., Schulte, S., and Richards, P.L., 2002, Impervious surfaces and water quality: A review of current literature and its implications for watershed planning, Journal of Planning Literature, 16(4): 499–514.
11. Clausen, J.C., Warner, G., Civco, D., and Hood, M., 2003, Nonpoint education for municipal officials impervious surface research, Final Report, Connecticut DEP, 18pp.
12. Schueler, T.R., 2003, Impacts of impervious cover on aquatic systems, Watershed Protection Research Monograph No. 1, Center for Watershed Protection, Ellicott City, MD.
13. Booth, D.B., Hartley, D., and Jackson, R., 2002, Forest cover, impervious-surface area, and mitigation of stormwater impacts, Journal of the American Resources Association, 38(3): 835–846.
14. Goetz, S.J., Write, R.K., Smith, A.J., Zinecker, E., and Schaub, E., 2003, IKONOS imagery for resource management: Tree cover, impervious surfaces, and riparian buffer analyses in the mid-Atlantic region, Remote Sensing of Environment, 88: 195–208.