Gaze fluctuations are not additively decomposable: Reply to Bogartz and Staub

Cognition

Volumn 126, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 128-134

  Kelty Stephen, Damian G ^a   Mirman, Daniel ^b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MOSS REHABILITATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Fixations; Gaze; Interactivity; Multifractal; Saccades

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; EYE FIXATION; GAZE; HISTOGRAM; HUMAN; MODEL; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; VISUAL STIMULATION;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COGNITION; EYE MOVEMENTS; FIXATION, OCULAR; FRACTALS; HUMANS; OCULOMOTOR MUSCLES; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SACCADES;

EID: 84868342436     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.002     Document Type: Note

References (33)

1. Bechtel W. Constructinge a philosophy of science of cognitive science. Topics in Cognitive Science 2009, 1:548-569.
2. Blignaut P.J. Fixation identification: The optimum threshold for a dispersion algorithm. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2009, 71:881-895.
3. Bogartz R.S., Staub A. Gaze step distributions reflect fixations and saccades: A comments on Stephen and Mirman (2010). Cognition 2012, 123(2):325-334. 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.12.014.
4. Chhabra A.B., Jensen R.V. Direct determination of the f(α) singularity spectrum. Physics Review Letters 1989, 62:1327-1330.
5. Dell G.S. A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review 1986, 93(3):283-321.
6. Doma H., Hallett P. Dependence of saccadic eye-movements on stimulus luminance, and an effect of task. Vision Research 1988, 28:915-924.
7. Engbert R., Kliegl R. How tight is the link between lexical processing and saccade programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2003, 26:491-492.
8. Farmer T.A., Christiansen M.H., Monaghan P. Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2006, 103(32):12203-12208. 10.1073/pnas.0602173103.
9. Farmer T.A., Monaghan P., Misyak J.B., Christiansen M.H. Phonological typicality influences sentence processing in predictive contexts: Reply to Staub, Grant, Clifton, and Rayner (2009). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2011, 37(5):1318-1325. 10.1037/a0023063.
10. Holden J.G., Van Orden G., Turvey M.T. Dispersion of response times reveals cognitive dynamics. Psychological Review 2009, 116:318-342.
11. α fluctuation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2010, 139:436-463.
12. Karsh R., Breitenbach F.W. Looking at looking: The amorphous fixation measure. Eye movements and psychological functions: International views 1983, 53-64. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. R. Groner, C. Menz, D.F. Fisher, R.A. Monty (Eds.).
13. Manor B.R., Gordon E. Defining the temporal threshold for ocular fixation in free-viewing visuocognitive tasks. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2003, 128:85-93.
14. McClelland J.L., Mirman D., Holt L.L. Are there interactive processes in speech perception?. Trends in Cognitive Science 2006, 10:363-369.
15. Mirman, D., Bolger, D. J., Khaitan, P., McClelland, J. L. (in press). Interactive activation and mutual constraint satisfaction in perception and cognition. Cognitive Science.
16. Mirman D., Irwin J.R., Stephen D.G. Eye-movement dynamics and cognitive self-organization in typical and atypical development. Cognitive Neurodynamics 2012, 6:61-73.
17. Nyström M., Holmqvist K. An adaptive algorithm for fixation, saccade, and glissade detection in eyetracking data. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 2010, 42:188-204.
18. Pillalamarri R.S., Barnette B.D., Birkmire D., Karsh D. Cluster: A program for the identification of eye-fixation-cluster characteristics. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 1993, 25:9-15.
19. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 1998, 124:372-422.
20. Rumelhart D.E. Toward an interactive model of reading. Attention and Performance VI 1977, 573-603. LEA, Hillsdale, NJ. S. Dornic (Ed.).
21. Salvucci D.D., Goldberg J.H. Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols. Proceedings of the eye-tracking research and applications symposium 2000, 71-78. ACM Press, New York. A.T. Duchowski (Ed.).
22. Schreiber T., Schmitz A. Improved surrogate data for nonlinearity tests. Physics Review Letters 1996, 77:635-638.
23. Schreiber T., Schmitz A. Surrogate time series. Physica D 2000, 142:346-382.
24. Shic F., Chawarska K., Scassellati B. The amorphous fixation measure revisited: With applications to autism. Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society 2008, 1964. Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX. B.C. Love, K. McRae, V.M. Sloutsky (Eds.).
25. Sornette D. Critical phenomena in natural sciences: Chaos, fractals, self-organization, and disorder: Concepts and tools 2004, Springer, New York.
26. Staub A., Grant M., Clifton C., Rayner K. Phonological typicality does not influence fixation durations in normal reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2009, 35(3):806-814. 10.1037/a0015123.
27. Staub A., Grant M., Clifton C., Rayner K. Still no phonological typicality effect on word reading time (and no good explanation of one, either): A rejoinder to Farmer, Monaghan, Misyak, and Christiansen. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2011, 37:1326-1328.
28. Stephen D.G., Anastas J.R., Dixon J.A. Scaling in executive control reflects multiplicative multifractal cascade dynamics. Frontiers in Physiology-Fractal Physiology 2012, 3:102.
29. Stephen D.G., Mirman D. Interactions dominate the dynamics of visual cognition. Cognition 2010, 115:154-165.
30. Theiler J., Linsay P., Rubin D. Detecting nonlinearity in data with long coherence times. Time series prediction: Forecasting the future and understanding the past 1994, 429-455. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. A. Weigand, N. Gershenfeld (Eds.).
31. Van Orden G., Holden J.G., Turvey M.T. Self-organization of cognitive performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2003, 132:331-350.
32. Van Orden G., Holden J.G., Turvey M.T. Human cognition and 1/f scaling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2005, 134:117-123.
33. Van Orden G., Kello C.T., Holden J.G. Situated behavior and the place of measurement in psychological theory. Ecological Psychology 2010, 22:24-43.