Still No Phonological Typicality Effect on Word Reading Time (and No Good Explanation of One, Either): A Rejoinder to Farmer, Monaghan, Misyak, and Christiansen

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1326-1328

  Staub, Adrian ^a   Grant, Margaret ^a   Clifton, Charles ^a   Rayner, Keith ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; NOTE; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS;

EYE MOVEMENTS; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS;

EID: 80052834637     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0024193     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. Farmer T.A., Christiansen M.H., Monaghan P. Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006, 103:12203-12208. 10.1073/pnas.0602173103.
2. Farmer T.A., Monaghan P., Misyak J.B., Christiansen M.H. Phonological typicality influences sentence processing in predictive contexts: A reply to Staub et al. (2009). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2011.
3. Staub A., Clifton C. Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: Evidence from either... or. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2006, 32:425-436. 10.1037/0278-7393.32.2.425.
4. Staub A., Clifton C., Frazier L. Heavy NP shift is the parser's last resort: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 2006, 54:389-406. 10.1016/j.jml.2005.12.002.
5. Staub A., Grant M., Clifton C., Rayner K. Phonological typicality does not influence fixation durations in normal reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2009, 35:806-814. 10.1037/a0015123.