Dominance of Lactobacillus acidophilus in the facultative jejunal Lactobacillus microbiota of fistulated beagles

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 78, Issue 19, 2012, Pages 7156-7159

  Tang, Yurui ^a   Manninen, Titta J K ^a   Saris, Per E J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

16S RRNA GENE; DNA FINGERPRINTS; LACTOBACILLUS ACIDOPHILUS; MICROBIOTAS; REP-PCR;

GENE ENCODING; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RNA;

BACILLI;

BACTERIAL DNA; RIBOSOME DNA; RNA 16S;

BACTERIUM; DOMINANCE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL COUNT; BIODIVERSITY; BIOTA; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DNA FINGERPRINTING; DNA SEQUENCE; DOG; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; JEJUNUM; LACTOBACILLUS; MICROBIOLOGY; MOLECULAR TYPING;

ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; BIOTA; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; DNA FINGERPRINTING; DNA, BACTERIAL; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; DOGS; JEJUNUM; LACTOBACILLUS; MOLECULAR TYPING; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

LACTOBACILLUS; LACTOBACILLUS ACIDOPHILUS;

EID: 84868307783     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01975-12     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Abbas Hilmi HT, Surakka A, Apajalahti J, Saris PE. 2007. Identification of the most abundant Lactobacillus species in the crop of 1-and 5-weekold broiler chickens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:7867-7873.
2. Bâati L, Fabre-Gea C, Auriol D, Blanc PJ. 2000. Study of the cryotolerance of Lactobacillus acidophilus: effect of culture and freezing conditions on the viability and cellular protein levels. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 59:241-247.
3. Baillon ML, Marshall-Jones ZV, Butterwick RF. 2004. Effects of probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus strain DSM13241 in healthy adult dogs. Am. J. Vet. Res. 65:338-343.
4. Beasley SS, Manninen TJ, Saris PE. 2006. Lactic acid bacteria isolated from canine faeces. J. Appl. Microbiol. 101:131-138.
5. Beasley SS. 2004. Isolation, identification and exploitation of lactic acid bacteria from human and animal microbiota. PhD thesis. University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
6. Bravo JA, et al. 2011. Ingestion of Lactobacillus strain regulates emotional behavior and central GABA receptor expression in a mouse via the vagus nerve. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108:16050-16055.
7. Chrzastowska M, Kander M, Depta A. 2009. Prospects for the use of probiotic bacteria in the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases in dogs. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 12:279-284.
8. Dogi CA, Perdigón G. 2006. Importance of the host specificity in the selection of probiotic bacteria. J. Dairy Res. 73:357-366.
9. Fu CJ, Carter JN, Li Y, Porter JH, Kerley MS. 2006. Comparison of agar plate and real-time PCR on enumeration of Lactobacillus, Clostridium perfringens and total anaerobic bacteria in dog faeces. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 42:490-494.
10. Gevers D, Huys G, Swings J. 2001. Applicability of rep-PCR fingerprinting for identification of Lactobacillus species. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 205: 31-36.
11. Greetham HL, Giffard C, Hutson RA, Collins MD, Gibson GR. 2002. Bacteriology of the Labrador dog gut: a cultural and genotypic approach. J. Appl. Microbiol. 93:640-646.
12. Harmoinen JA, Mättö JM, Rinkinen ML, Wilsson-Rahmberg M, Westermarck E. 2001. Permanent jejunal fistula: promising method for obtaining small intestinal chyme without disturbing intestinal function. Comp. Med. 51:252-256.
13. Heikkilä MP, Saris PE. 2003. Inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus by the commensal bacteria of human milk. J. Appl. Microbiol. 95:471-478.
14. Herstad HK, Nesheim BB, L'Abée-Lund T, Larsen S, Skancke E. 2010. Effects of a probiotic intervention in acute canine gastroenteritis-a controlled clinical trial. J. Small Anim. Pract. 51:34-38.
15. Ljungh A, Wadström T. 2006. Lactic acid bacteria as probiotics. Curr. Issues Intest. Microbiol. 7:73-89.
16. Manninen TJ, Rinkinen ML, Beasley SS, Saris PE. 2006. Alteration of the canine small-intestinal lactic acid bacterium microbiota by feeding of potential probiotics. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:6539-6543.
17. Mentula S, et al. 2005. Comparison between cultured small-intestinal and fecal microbiotas in beagle dogs. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:4169-4175.
18. Naidu AS, Bidlack WR, Clemens RA. 1999. Probiotic spectra of lactic acid bacteria (LAB). Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 39:13-126.
19. Perdigón G, Fuller R, Raya R. 2001. Lactic acid bacteria and their effect on the immune system. Curr. Issues Intest. Microbiol. 2:27-42.
20. Rinkinen ML, Koort JM, Ouwehand AC, Westermarck E, Björkroth KJ. 2004. Streptococcus alactolyticus is the dominating culturable lactic acid bacterium species in canine jejunum and feces of four fistulated dogs. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 230:35-39.
21. Sonnenburg JL, Chen CT, Gordon JI. 2006. Genomic and metabolic studies of the impact of probiotics on a model gut symbiont and host. PLoS Biol. 4:e413. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040413.
22. Strompfová V, Lauková A, Ouwehand AC. 2004. Lactobacilli and enterococci- potential probiotics for dogs. Folia Microbiol. (Praha) 49: 203-207.
23. Strompfová V, Marcináková M, Simonová M, Bogovic-Matijasić B, Lauková A. 2006. Application of potential probiotic Lactobacillus fermentum AD1 strain in healthy dogs. Anaerobe 12:75-79.
24. Versalovic J, Schneider M, De Bruijn FJ, Lupski JR. 1994. Genomic fingerprinting of bacteria using repetitive sequence-based polymerase chain reaction. Methods Mol. Cell. Biol. 5:25-40.
25. Wilsson-Rahmberg M, Jonsson O. 1997. Method for long-term intestinal access in the dog. Lab. Anim. 31:231-240.