Extrastriate cortex and medial temporal lobe regions respond differentially to visual feature overlap within preferred stimulus category

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 50, Issue 13, 2012, Pages 3053-3061

  Mundy, M E ^a,b   Downing, P E ^c   Graham, K S ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Ambiguity; Discrimination learning; Extrastriate; Memory; MTL; Perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXTRASTRIATE CORTEX; FACE; FEMALE; FUSIFORM FACE AREA; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATERAL OCCIPITAL COMPLEX; MALE; MEDIAL TEMPORAL LOBE; NORMAL HUMAN; PARAHIPPOCAMPAL PLACE AREA; PERIRHINAL CORTEX; PREDICTION; RECOGNITION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISION; VISUAL FEATURE OVERLAP; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FACE; FEMALE; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMANS; MALE; PARAHIPPOCAMPAL GYRUS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPACE PERCEPTION; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84868304009     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Andrews T.J., Ewbank M.P. Distinct representations for facial identity and changeable aspects of faces in the human temporal lobe. NeuroImage 2004, 23:905-913.
2. Barense M.D., Gaffan D., Graham K.S. The human medial temporal lobe processes online representations of complex objects. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:2963-2974.
3. Barense M.D., Henson R.N., Graham K.S. Perception and conception: temporal lobe activity during complex discriminations of familiar and novel faces and objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2010, 23:3052-3067.
4. Barense M.D., Henson R.N., Lee A.C., Graham K.S. Medial temporal lobe activity during complex discrimination of faces, objects, and scenes: effects of viewpoint. Hippocampus 2010, 20:389-401.
5. Barense M.D., Bussey T.J., Lee A.C., Rogers T.T., Davies R.R., Saksida L.M., et al. Functional specialization in the human medial temporal lobe. Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 25:10239-10246.
6. Bartko S.J., Winters B.D., Cowell R.A., Saksida L.M., Bussey T.J. Perceptual functions of perirhinal cortex in rats: zero-delay object recognition and simultaneous oddity discriminations. Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27:2548-2559.
7. Bartko S.J., Winters B.D., Cowell R.A., Saksida L.M., Bussey T.J. Perirhinal cortex resolves feature ambiguity in configural object recognition and perceptual oddity tasks. Learning and Memory 2007, 14:821-832.
8. Beckmann C.F., Jenkinson M., Smith S.M. General multilevel linear modeling for group analysis in fMRI. NeuroImage 2003, 20:1052-1063.
9. Bird C.M., Shallice T., Cipolotti L. Fractionation of memory in medial temporal lobe amnesia. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:1160-1171.
10. Buckley M.J., Booth M.C., Rolls E.T., Gaffan D. Selective perceptual impairments after perirhinal cortex ablation. Journal of Neuroscience 2001, 21:9824-9836.
11. Buckley M.J., Gaffan D. Impairment of visual object discrimination learning after perirhinal cortex ablation. Behavioural Neuroscience 1997, 111:467-475.
12. Buckner R.L., Goodman J., Burock M., Rotte M., Koutstaal W., Schacter D., et al. Functional-anatomic correlates of object priming in humans revealed by rapid presentation event-related fMRI. Neuron 1998, 20:285-296.
13. Bussey T.J., Saksida L.M. Memory, perception, and the ventral visual-perirhinal-hippocampal stream: thinking outside of the boxes. Hippocampus 2007, 17:898-908.
14. Bussey T.J., Saksida L.M., Murray E.A. Perirhinal cortex resolves feature ambiguity in complex visual discriminations. European Journal of Neuroscience 2002, 15:365-374.
15. Cowell R.A., Bussey T.J., Saksida L.M. Components of recognition memory: dissociable cognitive processes or just differences in representational complexity?. Hippocampus 2010, 20:1245-1262.
16. Cowell R.A., Bussey T.J., Saksida L.M. Functional dissociations within the ventral object processing pathway: cognitive modules or a hierarchical continuum?. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2010, 22:2460-2479.
17. Devlin J.T., Price C.J. Perirhinal contributions to human visual perception. Current Biology 2007, 17:1484-1488.
18. Diana R.A., Yonelinas A.P., Ranganath C. Imaging recollection and familiarity in the medial temporal lobe: a three component model. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11:379-386.
19. Diana R.A., Yonelinas A.P., Ranganath C. Medial temporal lobe activity during source retrieval reflects information type, not memory strength. Journal of Cognitive Neurosciences 2010, 22:1808-1818.
20. Downing P., Peelen M. The role of occipitotemporal body-selective regions in person perception. Cognitive Neuroscience 2011, 2(3-4):186-203.
21. Downing P., Yuhong J., Shuman M., Kanwisher N. A cortical area selective for processing the human body. Science 2001, 293:2470-2473.
22. Epstein R.A. Parahippocampal and retrosplenial contributions to human spatial navigation. Trends in Cognitive Science 2008, 12:388-396.
23. Epstein R., Harris A., Stanley D., Kanwisher N. The parahippocampal place area: recognition, navigation, or encoding?. Neuron 1999, 23:115-125.
24. Epstein R., Kanwisher N. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 1998, 392:598-601.
25. Epstein R.A., Whitney E.P., Feiler A.M. Where am I now? Distinct roles for parahippocampal and retrosplenial cortices in place recognition. Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27:6141-6149.
26. Gotts S.J., Milleville S.C., Bellgowan P.S.F., Martin A. Broad and narrow conceptual tuning in the human frontal lobes. Cerebral Cortex 2011, 21:477-491.
27. Graham K.S., Barense M.D., Lee A.C.H. Going beyond LTM in the MTL: a synthesis of neuropsychological and neuroimaging findings on the role of the medial temporal lobe in memory and perception. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:831-853.
28. Graham K.S., Downing P.E., Ingamells E., Dwyer D.M., Honey R.C., Mundy M.E. Domain specific response in medial temporal and extrastriate cortex during perceptual learning of visually similar stimuli. Cognitive Neuroscience Society 2010, I101.
29. Graham K.S., Scahill V.L., Hornberger M., Barense M.D., Lee A.C., Bussey T.J., et al. Abnormal categorization and perceptual learning in patients with hippocampal damage. Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26:7547-7554.
30. Grill-Spector K., Henson R.N., Martin A. Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends in Cognitive Science 2006, 10:14-23.
31. Grill-Spector K., Kushnir T., Hendler T., Edelman S., Itzchak Y., Malach R. A sequence of object processing stages revealed by fMRI in the human occipital lobe. Human Brain Mapping 1998, 6:316-328.
32. Grill-Spector K., Malach R. fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. Acta Psychologia (Amst) 2001, 107:293-321.
33. Grill-Spector K., Malach R. The human visual cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2004, 27:649-677.
34. Hartley T., Bird C.M., Chan D., Cipolotti L., Husain M., Vargha-Khadem F., et al. The hippocampus is required for short-term topographical memory in humans. Hippocampus 2007, 17:34-48.
35. Haxby J.V., Gobbini M.I., Furey M.L., Ishai A., Schouten J.L., Pietrini P. Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science 2001, 293:2425-2430.
36. Henson R.N., Shallice T., Dolan R.J. Neuroimaging evidence for dissociable forms of repetition priming. Science 2000, 287:1269-1272.
37. Jenkinson M., Smith S. A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Medical Image Analysis 2001, 5:143-156.
38. Jenkinson M., Bannister P., Brady M., Smith S. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. NeuroImage 2002, 17:825-841.
39. Jensen E.J., Hargreaves I., Bass A., Pexman P., Goodyear B.G., Federico P. Cortical reorganization and reduced efficiency of visual word recognition in right temporal lobe epilepsy: a functional MRI study. Epilepsy Research 2011, 93:155-163.
40. Joseph J.E., Gathers A.D. Effects of structural similarity on neural substrates for object recognition. Cognitive and Affective Behavioural Neuroscience 2003, 3:1-16.
41. Kanwisher N., McDermott J., Chun M.M. The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience 1997, 17:4302-4311.
42. Kanwisher N., Yovel G. The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society London B Biological Science 2006, 361(1476):2109-2128.
43. Kravitz D.J., Peng C.S., Baker C.I Real-world scene representations in high-level visual cortex: it's the spaces more than the places. Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31:7322-7333.
44. Lee A.C., Barense M.D., Graham K.S. The contribution of the human medial temporal lobe to perception: bridging the gap between animal and human studies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology B 2005, 58:300-325.
45. Lee A.C., Rudebeck S.R. Human medial temporal lobe damage can disrupt the perception of single objects. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30:6588-6594.
46. Lee A.C., Scahill V.L., Graham K.S. Activating the medial temporal lobe during oddity judgment for faces and scenes. Cerebral Cortex 2008, 18:683-696.
47. Lee A.C., Bandelow S., Schwarzbauer C., Henson R.N., Graham K.S. Perirhinal cortex activity during visual object discrimination: an event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage 2006, 33:362-373.
48. Lee A.C., Yeung L.K., Barense M.D. The hippocampus and visual perception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2012, 20(6):91.
49. McTighe S.M., Cowell R.A., Winters B.D., Bussey T.J., Saksida L.M. Paradoxical false memory for objects after brain damage. Science 2010, 330:1408-1410.
50. Mundy M.E., Honey R.C., Downing P.E., Wise R.G., Graham K.S., Dwyer D.M. Material-independent and material-specific activation in functional MRI after perceptual learning. NeuroReport 2009, 20:1397-1401.
51. Myers A., Sowden P.T. Your hand or mine? The extrastriate body area. NeuroImage 2008, 42:1669-1677.
52. Peelen M.V., Downing P.E. Within-subject reproducibility of category-specific visual activation with functional MRI. Human Brain Mapping 2005, 25:402-408.
53. Pitcher D., Charles L., Devlin J.T., Walsh V., Duchaine B. Triple dissociation of faces, bodies, and objects in extrastriate cortex. Current Biology 2009, 19(4):319-324.
54. Preston A.R., Bornstein A.M., Hutchinson J.B., Gaare M.E., Glover G.H., Wagner A.D. High-resolution fMRI of content-sensitive subsequent memory responses in human medial temporal lobe. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2010, 22:156-173.
55. Rajimehr R., Young J.C., Tootell R.B. An anterior temporal face patch in human cortex, predicted by macaque maps. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2009, 106:1995-2000.
56. Sawamura H., Orban G.A., Vogels R. Selectivity of neuronal adaptation does not match response selectivity: a single-cell study of the fMRI adaptation paradigm. Neuron 2006, 49:307-318.
57. Saksida L.M., Bussey T.J. The representational-hierarchical view of amnesia: translation from animal to human. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48(8):2370-2384.
58. Schwarzlose R.F., Swisher J.D., Dang S., Kanwisher N.G. The distribution of category and location information across object-selective regions in human visual cortex. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2008, 105:4447-4452.
59. Shrager Y., Gold J.J., Hopkins R.O., Squire L.R. Intact visual perception in memory-impaired patients with medial temporal lobe lesions. Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26:2235-2240.
60. Smith S.M. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Human Brain Mapping 2002, 17:143-155.
61. Starensina B.P., Duncan K.D., Davachi L. Perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices differentially contribute to later recollection of object- and scene-related event details. Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31:8739-8747.
62. Taylor J.C., Downing P.E. Division of labor between lateral and ventral extrastriate representations of faces, bodies, and objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2011, 23:4122-4137.
63. Taylor J.C., Wiggett A.J., Downing P.E. fMRI-adaptation studies of viewpoint tuning in the extrastriate and fusiform body areas. Journal of Neurophysiology 2010, 103:1467-1477.
64. Taylor K.J., Henson R.N.A., Graham K.S. Recognition memory for faces and scenes in amnesia: dissociable roles of medial temporal lobe structures. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:2428-2438.
65. Tsao D.Y., Moeller S., Freiwald W.A. Comparing face patch systems in macaques and humans. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2008, 105:19514-19519.
66. Vuilleumier P., Henson R.N., Driver J., Dolan R.J. Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5:491-499.
67. Wiggett A.J., Pritchard I., Downing P.E. Animate and inanimate objects in human visual cortex: evidence for task-independent category effects. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:3111-3117.
68. Witter M.P. The parahippocampal region: past, present, and future. The parahippocampal region. Organization and role cognitive function 2002, 3-19. Oxford University Press. Witter, Wouterlood (Eds.).
69. Woolrich M.W., Ripley B.D., Brady M., Smith S.M. Temporal autocorrelation in univariate linear modeling of fMRI data. NeuroImage 2001, 14:1370-1386.
70. Woolrich M.W., Behrens T.E., Beckmann C.F., Jenkinson M., Smith S.M. Multilevel linear modelling for fMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference. NeuroImage 2004, 21:1732-1747.