Negative effects of item repetition on source memory

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 889-901

  Kim, Kyungmi ^a   Yi, Do Joon ^b   Raye, Carol L ^a   Johnson, Marcia K ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Item repetition; Novelty; Reminding; Source memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; RECOGNITION; TIME;

ADULT; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84868301776     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: 15325946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-012-0196-2     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Äberg, C. S., & Nilsson, L. G. (2001). Facilitation of source discrimination in the novelty effect. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 42, 349-357. doi: 10. 1111/1467-9450. 00246.
2. Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717-726. doi: 10. 1016/S0022-5371(72)80006-9.
3. Chalfonte, B. L., & Johnson, M. K. (1996). Feature memory and binding in young and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 24, 403-416. doi: 10. 3758/BF03200930.
4. Chalmers, K. A., & Humphreys, M. S. (1998). Role of generalized and episode specific memories in the word frequency effect in recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 610-632. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 24. 3. 610.
5. Chun, M. M., & Johnson, M. K. (2011). Memory: Enduring traces of perceptual and reflective attention. Neuron, 72, 520-535. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuron. 2011. 10. 026.
6. Diana, R. A., & Reder, L. M. (2006). The low-frequency encoding disadvantage: Word frequency affects processing demands. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 805-815. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 32. 4. 805.
7. Gardiner, J. M., & Richardson-Klavehn, A. (2000). Remembering and knowing. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 229-244). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
8. Gibson, E. J. (1940). A systematic application of the concepts of generalization and differentiation to verbal learning. Psychological Review, 47, 196-229. doi: 10. 1037/h0060582.
9. Gibson, E. J. (1953). Improvement in perceptual judgments as a function of controlled practice or training. Psychological Bulletin, 50, 401-431. doi: 10. 1037/h0055517.
10. Glanzer, M., & Adams, J. K. (1985). The mirror effect in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 13, 8-20. doi: 10. 3758/BF03198438.
11. Glanzer, M., & Adams, J. K. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 21-31. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 16. 1. 5.
12. Glanzer, M., Adams, J. K., Iverson, G. J., & Kim, K. (1993). The regularities of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 100, 546-567. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 100. 3. 546.
13. Guttentag, R. E., & Carroll, D. (1997). Recollection-based recognition: Word frequency effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 502-516. doi: 10. 1006/jmla. 1997. 2532.
14. Henkel, L. A., Franklin, N., & Johnson, M. K. (2000). Cross-modal source monitoring confusions between perceived and imagined events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 321-335. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 26. 2. 321.
15. Hicks, J. L., Marsh, R. L., & Cook, G. I. (2005). An observation on the role of context variability in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1160-1164. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 31. 5. 1160.
16. Hintzman, D. L. (1976). Repetition and memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 10, pp. 47-91). New York, NY: Academic Press.
17. Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95, 528-551. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 95. 4. 528.
18. Hintzman, D. L. (2004). Judgment of frequency versus recognition confidence: Repetition and recursive reminding. Memory & Cognition, 32, 336-350. doi: 10. 3758/BF03196863.
19. Hintzman, D. L. (2010). How does repetition affect memory? Evidence from judgments of recency. Memory & Cognition, 38, 102-115. doi: 10. 3758/MC. 38. 1. 102.
20. Hintzman, D. L., & Waters, R. M. (1970). Recency and frequency as factors in list discrimination. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 218-221. doi: 10. 1016/S0022-5371(70)80054-8.
21. Holmes, J. B., Waters, H. S., & Rajaram, S. (1998). The phenomenology of false memories: Episodic content and confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1026-1040. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 24. 4. 1026.
22. Howell, W. C. (1973). Representation of frequency in memory. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 44-53. doi: 10. 1037/h0034648.
23. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28. doi: 10. 1037/0033-2909. 114. 1. 3.
24. Johnson, M. K., Nolde, S. F., & De Leonardis, D. M. (1996). Emotional focus and source monitoring. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 135-156. doi: 10. 1006/jmla. 1996. 0008.
25. Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67-85. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 88. 1. 67.
26. Jurica, P. J., & Shimamura, A. P. (1999). Monitoring item and source information: Evidence for a negative generation effect in source memory. Memory & Cognition, 27, 648-656. doi: 10. 3758/BF03211558.
27. Kelley, C. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (2000). Recollection and familiarity: Process-dissociation. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 215-228). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
28. Kirchhoff, B. A., Wagner, A. D., Maril, A., & Stern, C. E. (2000). Prefrontal-temporal circuitry for episodic encoding and subsequent memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 6173-6180. Retrieved from www. jneurosci. org/content/20/16/6173. full. pdf+html.
29. Kishiyama, M. M., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2003). Novelty effects on recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 31, 1045-1051. doi: 10. 3758/BF03196125.
30. Kormi-Nouri, R., Nilsson, L. G., & Ohta, N. (2005). The novelty effect: Support for the novelty-encoding hypothesis. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 133-143. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-9450. 2005. 00443. x.
31. Kumaran, D., & Maguire, E. A. (2006). An unexpected sequence of events: Mismatch detection in the human hippocampus. PLoS Biology, 4, e424. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pbio. 0040424.
32. Lisman, J. E., & Grace, A. A. (2005). The hippocampal-VTA loop: Controlling the entry of information into long-term memory. Neuron, 46, 703-713. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuron. 2005. 05. 002.
33. Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490. doi: 10. 3758/BF03210951.
34. Lyle, K. B., & Johnson, M. K. (2006). Importing perceived features into false memories. Memory, 14, 197-213. doi: 10. 1080/09658210544000060.
35. Marsh, R. L., Cook, G. I., & Hicks, J. L. (2006). The effect of context variability on source memory. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1578-1586. doi: 10. 3758/BF03195921.
36. Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (2003). When more is less: A counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 132, 228-252. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 132. 2. 228.
37. Naveh-Benjamin, M., Craik, F. I. M., Guez, J., & Dori, H. (1998). Effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory: Further support for an asymmetry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1091-1104. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 24. 5. 1091.
38. Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Guez, J. (2000). Effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: Assessment of attentional costs and a componential analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1461-1482. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 26. 6. 1461.
39. Newby, R. W. (1981). Contextual cues in multiple-item recognition. The American Journal of Psychology, 94, 513-526. doi: 10. 2307/1422260.
40. Overton, R. C., & Adolphson, C. J. (1979). Multiple trace retrieval: A trace-to-trace retrieval process? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 485-495. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 5. 5. 485.
41. Poppenk, J., Köhler, S., & Moscovitch, M. (2010). Revisiting the novelty effect: When familiarity, not novelty, enhances memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1321-1330. doi: 10. 1037/a0019900.
42. Postman, L. (1971). Transfer, interference, and forgetting. In J. W. Kling & L. A. Riggs (Eds.), Woodworth and Schlosberg's experimental psychology (3rd ed., pp. 1019-1132). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
43. Rao, K. V., & Proctor, R. W. (1984). Study-phase processing and the word frequency effect in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 386-394. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 10. 3. 386.
44. Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 8, pp. 63-131). Amsterdam, TheNetherlands: Elsevier.
45. Rugg, M. D., Cox, C. J. C., Doyle, M. C., & Wells, T. (1995). Event-related potentials and the recollection of low and high frequency words. Neuropsychologia, 33, 471-484. doi: 10. 1016/0028-3932(94)00132-9.
46. Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 6. 2. 174.
47. Starns, J. J., & Hicks, J. L. (2005). Source dimensions are retrieved independently in multidimensional monitoring tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1213-1220. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 31. 6. 1213.
48. Starns, J. J., & Hicks, J. L. (2008). Context attributes in memory are bound to item information, but not to one another. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 309-314. doi: 10. 3758/PBR. 15. 2. 309.
49. Treisman, A., & Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107-141. doi: 10. 1016/0010-0285(82)90006-8.
50. Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
51. Tulving, E., & Kroll, N. (1995). Novelty assessment in the brain and long-term memory encoding. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 387-390. doi: 10. 3758/BF03210977.
52. Tulving, E., Markowitsch, H. J., Craik, F. I. M., Habib, R., & Houle, S. (1996). Novelty and familiarity activations in PET studies of memory encoding and retrieval. Cerebral Cortex, 6, 71-79. doi: 10. 1093/cercor/6. 1. 71.
53. Tulving, E., & Schacter, D. L. (1990). Priming and human memory systems. Science, 247, 301-306. doi: 10. 1126/science. 2296719.
54. Underwood, B. J. (1949). Proactive inhibition as a function of time and degree of prior learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 24-34. doi: 10. 1037/h0059550.
55. Wixted, J. T., & Stretch, V. (2004). In defense of the signal detection interpretation of remember/know judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 616-641. doi: 10. 3758/BF03196616.