The effect of context variability on source memory

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 34, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 1578-1586

  Marsh, Richard L ^a,d   Cook, Gabriel I ^b   Hicks, Jason L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE   (United States)

^c LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d University of Georgia ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; RECOGNITION; SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL METHOD;

EID: 34247216540     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03195921     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. BINK, M. L., MARSH, R. L., & HICKS, J. L. (1999). An alternative conceptualization to memory "strength" in reality monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 25, 804-809.
2. BODNER, G. E., & LINDSAY, D.S. (2003). Remembering and knowing in context. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 563-580.
3. CHALPONTE, B. L., & JOHNSON, M. K. (1996). Feature memory and binding in young and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 24, 403-416.
4. COOK, G. I., MARSH, R. L., & HICKS, J. L. (2006). The role of recollection and familiarity in the context variability mirror effect. Memory & Cognition, 34, 240-250.
5. DENNIS, S., & HUMPHREYS, M. S. (2001). A context noise model of episodic word recognition. Psychological Review, 108, 452-478.
6. GARDINER, J. M., & JAVA, R. I. (1990). Recollective experience in word and nonword recognition. Memory & Cognition, 18, 23-30.
7. GARDINER, J. M., RAMPONI, C., & RICHARDSON-KLAVEHN, A. (1998). Experiences of remembering, knowing, and guessing. Consciousness & Cognition, 7, 1-26.
8. GLANZER, M., & ADAMS, J. K. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 16, 5-16.
9. GUTTENTAG, R. E., & CARROLL, D. (1994). Identifying the basis for the word frequency effect in recognition memory. Memory, 2, 255-273.
10. GUTTENTAG, R. E., & CARROLL, D. (1997). Recollection-based recognition: Word frequency effects. Journal of Memory & Language, 37, 502-516.
11. HICKS, J. L., & MARSH, R. L. (1999). Remember-know judgments can depend on how memory is tested. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 117-122.
12. HICKS, J. L., MARSH, R. L., & COOK, G. I. (2005). An observation on the role of context variability in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 1160-1164.
13. HICKS, J. L., MARSH, R. L., & RITSCHEL, L. (2002). The role of recollection and partial information in source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 28, 503-508.
14. HOWARD, M. W., & KAHANA, M. J. (1999). Contextual variability and serial position effects in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 25, 923-941.
15. HOWARD, M. W., & KAHANA, M. J. (2002). A distributed representation of temporal context. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 46, 269-299.
16. JOHNSON, M. K., & CHALFONTE, B. L. (1994). Binding complex memories: The role of reactivation and the hippocampus. In D. L. Schacter & E. Tulving (Eds.), Memory systems (pp. 311-350). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. JOHNSON, M. K., HASHTROUDI, S., & LINDSAY, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
18. JOHNSON, M. K., RAYE, C. L., FOLEY, H. J., & FOLEY, M. A. (1981). Cognitive operations and decision bias in reality monitoring. American Journal of Psychology, 94, 37-64.
19. JOORDENS, S., & HOCKLEY, W. E. (2000). Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: When old does not mirror new. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1534-1555.
20. LANDAUER, T. K., FOLTZ, P. W., & LAHAM, D. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259-284.
21. MACKEN, W. J. (2002). Environmental context and recognition: The role of recollection and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 28, 153-161.
22. MARSH, R. L., & HICKS, J. L. (1998). Test formats change source-monitoring decision processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 1137-1151.
23. MARSH, R. L., HICKS, J. L., & COOK, G. I. (2004). Focused attention on one contextual attribute does not reduce source memory for a different attribute. Memory, 12, 183-192.
24. MCCLELLAND, J. L., & CHAPPELL, M. (1998). Familiarity breeds differentiation: A subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. Psychological Review, 105, 724-760.
25. MEISER, T., & BROEDER, A. (2002). Memory for multidimensional source information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 116-137.
26. MURNANE, K., PHELPS, M. P., & MALMBERG, K. (1999). Context-dependent recognition memory: The ICE theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 403-415.
27. PERFECT, T. J., MAYES, A. R., DOWNES, J. J., & VAN EIJK, R. (1996). Does context discriminate recollection from familiarity in recognition memory? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 797-813.
28. QIN, J., RAYE, C. L., JOHNSON, M. K., & MITCHELL, K. J. (2001). Source ROCs are (typically) curvilinear: Comment on Yonelinas (1999). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 27, 1110-1115.
29. SLOTNICK, S. D., KLEIN, S. A., DODSON, C. S., & SHIMAMURA, A. P. (2000). An analysis of signal detection and threshold models of source memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1499-1517.
30. STEYVERS, M., & MALMBERG, K. J. (2003). The effect of normative context variability on recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 29, 760-766.
31. TREISMAN, A. (1998). Feature binding, attention and object perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 353, 1295-1306.
32. YONELINAS, A. P., & JACOBY, L. L. (1996). Noncriterial recollection: Familiarity as automatic, irrelevant recollection. Consciousness & Cognition, 5, 131-141.