Shared decision-making: Enhancing the clinical relevance

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

Volumn 105, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 416-421

  Entwistle, Vikki a ^a   Cribb, Alan ^b   Watt, Ian s ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; PATIENT AUTONOMY; SHARED DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; HUMAN RELATION; RESPONSIBILITY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; PATIENT PARTICIPATION;

DECISION MAKING; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; HUMANS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS;

EID: 84868283493     PISSN: 01410768     EISSN: 17581095     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.2012.120039     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Salzburg Global Seminar. The Salzburg statement on shared decision-making. 2011. See http://press.psprings.co.uk/bmj/march/Salzburg.pdf (last accessed 22 May 2012)
2. Edwards A, Elwyn G (Eds) Shared decision-making in health care: achieving evidence-based patient choice (2nd ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009
3. Stiggelbout AM, Van der Weijden T, Frosch D, et al. Shared decision-making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare. BMJ 2012:344:e256
4. Makoul G, Clayman ML. An integrative model of shared decision-making in medical encounters. Pat Educ Couns 2006;60:301-12
5. Cribb A, Entwistle VA. Shared decision-making: trade offs between narrower and broader conceptions. Health Expect 2011;14:210-219
6. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics (6th ed.) New York: Oxford University Press, 2009
7. Whitney SN, Holmes-Rovner M, Brody H, et al. Beyond shared decision-making: an expanded typology of medical decisions. Med Decis Making 2008;28:699-705
8. Entwistle VA, Carter SM, Trevena L, et al. Communicating about screening. BMJ 2009;337:789-91
9. Blumenthal D. Doctors in a wired world: can professionalism survive connectivity? Milbank Q 2002;80:525-46
10. Pieterse AH, Henselmans I, de Haes HCJM, Koning CCE, Geijsen ED, Smets EMA. Shared decision-making: prostate cancer patients' appraisal of treatment alternatives and oncologists' eliciting and responding behaviour, an explorative study. Pat Educ Couns 2011;85:e251–e259
11. Epstein RM, Peters E. Beyond information: exploring patients' preferences. JAMA 2009;302:195-7
12. Kukla R. How do patients know? Hastings Cent Rep 2007;37:27-35
13. Mendick N, Young B, Holcombe C, Salmon P. The ethics of responsibility and ownership in decision-making about treatment for breast cancer: triangulation of consultation with patient and surgeon perspectives. Soc Sci Med 2010;70:1904-11
14. Entwistle VA, Prior M, Skea ZC, Francis J. Involvement in decision-making: a qualitative investigation of its meaning for people with diabetes. Soc Sci Med 2008;66:362-375
15. Smith SK, Dixon A, Trevena L, Nutbeam D, McCaffery KJ. Exploring patient involvement in healthcare decision-making across different education and functional health literacy groups. Soc Sci Med 2009;69:1805-1812
16. Montori V, Gafni A, Charles C. A shared treatment decision-making approach between patients with chronic conditions and their clinicians: the case of diabetes. Health Expect 2006;9:25-36
17. Entwistle VA, Watt IS. Patient involvement in treatment decision-making: the case for a broader conceptual framework. Pat Educ Couns 2006;63:268-78
18. Entwistle VA, Carter SM, Cribb A, McCaffery KM. Supporting patient autonomy: the importance of clinical relationships. J Gen Int Med 2010;25:741-5
19. Mackenzie C, Stoljar N (Eds), Relational autonomy: feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000
20. Francis LP, Silvers A. Thinking about the good: reconfiguring liberal metaphysics (or not) for people with cognitive disabilities. In: Kittay EF, Carlson C (Eds). Cognitive disability and its challenge to moral philosophy. 2010 Wiley-Blackwell: 237-260