Communicating about screening

BMJ

Volumn 337, Issue 7673, 2008, Pages 789-791

  Entwistle, Vikki A ^a   Carter, Stacy M ^b,c   Trevena, Lyndal ^c   Flitcroft, Kathy ^d   Irwig, Les ^c   McCaffery, Kirsten ^d   Salkeld, Glenn ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^d NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST EXAMINATION; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCREENING TEST;

EID: 53649089071     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Sense About Science. Making sense of testing. London, 2008. www.senseaboutscience.org/index.php/site/ project/232.
2. Rimer BK, Briss PA, Zeller PK, Chan ECY, Woolf SH. Informed decision-making: what is its role in cancer screening? Cancer 2004;101(suppl 5):1214-28.
3. Raffle AE. Information about screening: is it to achieve high uptake or to ensure informed choice? Health Expect 2001;4:92-8.
4. Hargreaves KM, Stewart RJ, Oliver SR. Informed choice and public health screening for children: the case of blood spot screening. Health Expect 2005;8:161-71.
5. NHS Cancer Screening Programme. Breast screening: the facts. 2007. www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/ breastscreen/publications/ia-02.html.
6. Barratt A, Trevena L, Davey HM, McCaffery K. Use of decision aids to support informed choices about screening. BMJ 2003;329:507-10.
7. Irwig L, McCaffery K, Salkeld G, Bossuyt P. Informed choice for screening: implications for evaluation. BMJ 2006;332:1148-50.
8. Entwistle V. The potential contribution of decision aids to screening programmes. Health Expect 2001;4:109-15.
9. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
10. Jepson RG, Hewison J, Thompson A, Weller D. Patient perspectives on information and choice in cancer screening: a qualitative study in the UK. Soc Sci Med 2007;65:890-9.
11. Woodrow C, Watson E, Rozmovits L, Parker R, Austoker J. Public perceptions of communicating information about bowel cancer screening. Health Expect 2008;11:16-25.
12. Schwartz B. The paradox of choice: why more is less. New York: Harper Collins, 2004.
13. Douglas K, Jones D. Top 10 ways to make better decisions. New Sci 2007;194(2602):35-43.
14. Mackenzie C, Stoljar N, eds. Relational autonomy: feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
15. Kukla R. Conscientious autonomy: displacing decisions in health care. Hastings Cent Rep 2005;35:34-44.
16. Kukla R. How do patients know? Hastings Cent Rep 2007;37:27-35.
17. Meyers DT. Self, society and personal choice. New York: Columbia University Press, 1989.
18. Appiah KA. The ethics of identity. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2005.
19. Burkitt-Wright E, Holcombe C, Salmon P. Doctors' communication of trust, care, and respect in breast cancer: qualitative study. BMJ 2004;328:864.
20. Entwistle VA, Prior M, Skea ZC, Francis J. Involvement in decision-making: a qualitative investigation of its meaning for people with diabetes. Soc Sci Med 2008;66:362-75.
21. Baier A. Trust and antitrust. Ethics 1986;96:231-60.
22. UK National Screening Programme. Screening tests for your baby. 2007. www.screening.nhs.uk/ anpublications/baby_screening_tests.pdf.