Cognitive processes underlying the continuity effect in spatial reasoning

Expanding the Space of Cognitive Science - Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1127-1132

  Nejasmic, Jelica ^a   Krumnack, Antje ^a   Bucher, Leandra ^a   Knauff, Markus ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

belief revision; mental models; spatial cognition; Spatial reasoning; spatial relations

Indexed keywords

BELIEF REVISION; COGNITIVE PROCESS; CONSTRUCTION PROCESS; CONTINUITY EFFECT; MENTAL MODEL; SPATIAL COGNITION; SPATIAL INFORMATIONS; SPATIAL MENTAL MODELS; SPATIAL REASONING; SPATIAL RELATIONS;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

EID: 84868250911     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 412-417). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Craik, K. J. W. (1943). The Nature of Explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. De Soto, C. B., London, M., & Handel, S. (1965). Social reasoning and spatial paralogic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 513-521.
4. Ehrlich, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1982). Spatial descriptions and referential continuity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 296-306.
5. Evans, J. St. B. T., Newstead, S. E., & Byrne, R. M. J. (1993). Human reasoning. The psychology of deduction. Hove (UK): Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Goodwin, G. P., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2005). Reasoning with relations. Psychological Review, 112, 468–493.
7. Huttenlocher, J. (1968). Constructing spatial images: A strategy in reasoning. Psychological Review, 75, 550-560.
8. Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. (1991). Deduction. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
9. Hörnig, R., Oberauer, K., & Weidenfeld, A. (2005). Two principles of premise integration in spatial reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 33, 131-139.
10. th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 200-205). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 573-578). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Polk, T. A., & Newell, A. (1995). Deduction as verbal reasoning. Psychological Review, 102, 533–566.
13. th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, (pp. 1797-1802). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Rauh, R., Hagen, C., Kuss, T., Knauff, M., Schlieder, C., & Strube, G. (2005). Preferred and alternative mental models in spatial reasoning. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5(2&3), 239–269.
15. Rauh, R., Schlieder, C., & Knauff, M. (1997). Präferierte mentale Modelle beim räumlich-relationalen Schließen: Empirie und kognitive Modellierung. Kognitionswissenschaft, 6, 21–34.
16. Schaeken, W., Girotto, V., & Johnson Laird, P. N. (1998). The effect of an irrelevant premise on temporal and spatial reasoning. Kognitionswissenschaft, 7, 27–32.
17. Spalek, T. M., & Hammad, S. (2005). The left-to-right bias in inhibition of return is due to the direction of reading. Psychological Science, 16, 15-18
18. Vandierendonck, A., & deVooght, G. (1997). Working memory constraints on linear reasoning with spatial and temporal contents. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A(4), 803–820.