Evoked potential mapping of the rostral region by frameless navigation system in Mexican hairless pig

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Volumn 212, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 100-105

  Saito, Toshiyuki ^a,b   Uga, Minako ^b   Tsuzuki, Daisuke ^b   Yokota, Hidenori ^b   Oguro, Keiji ^b   Yamamoto, Tsuyoshi ^c   Dan, Ippeita ^b   Watanabe, Eiju ^b  

^a KYOTO SANGYO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b JICHI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c HITACHI LTD   (Japan)

Author keywords

Iterative closest point method; Rigid body transformation; Sus scrofa domesticus

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CANAL; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN REGION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; FRAMELESS STEREOTACTIC PROCEDURE; MALE; NEURONAVIGATION; NONHUMAN; PRIMARY SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; NEURONAVIGATION; STEREOTAXIC TECHNIQUES; SWINE; TOMOGRAPHY SCANNERS, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84868225712     PISSN: 01650270     EISSN: 1872678X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.09.027     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Andersen F., Watanabe H., Bjarkam C.R., Danielsen E.H., Cumming P., The DaNeX Study Group Pig brain stereotaxic standard space: mapping of cerebral blood flow normative values and effect of MPTP-lesioning. Brain Res Bull 2005, 66:17-29.
2. Besl P., McKay N. A method for registration of 3D shapes. IEEE Trans PAMI 2007, 14:239-256.
3. Bjarkam C.R., Cancian G., Glud A.N., Ettrup K.S., Jorgensen R.L., Sorensen J.C. MRI-guided stereotaxic targeting in pigs based on a stereotaxic localizer box fitted with an isocentric frame and use of SurgiPlan computer-planning software. J Neurosci Methods 2009, 183:119-126.
4. Bjarkam C.R., Cancian G., Larsen M., Rosendahl F., Ettrup K.S., Zeidler D., et al. MRI-compatible stereotaxic localizer box enables high-precision stereotaxic procedures in pigs. J Neurosci Methods 2004, 139:293-298.
5. Craner S.L., Ray R.H. Somatosensory cortex of the neonatal pig: I. Topographic organization of the primary somatosensory cortex (SI). J Comp Neurol 1991, 306:24-38.
6. Félix B., Léger M.E., Albe-Fessard D., Marcilloux J.C., Rampin O., Laplace J.P. Stereotaxic atlas of the pig brain. Brain Res Bull 1999, 49:1-137.
7. Grunert P., Darabi K., Espinosa J., Filippi R. Computer-aided navigation in neurosurgery. Neurosurg Rev 2003, 26:73-99.
8. Ikeda H., Leyba L., Bartolo A., Wang Y., Okada Y.C. Synchronized spikes of thalamocortical axonal terminals and cortical neurons are detectable outside the brain of piglet with high-resolution MEG. J Neurophysiol 2002, 87:626-630.
9. Ikeda H., Wang Y., Okada Y.C. Origins of the somatic N20 and high-frequency oscillations evoked by trigeminal stimulation in the piglets. Clin Neurophysiol 2005, 116:827-841.
10. Kosugi Y., Watanabe E., Goto J., Watanabe T., Yoshimoto S., Takakura K., et al. An articulated neurosurgical navigation system using MRI and CT images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1988, 35:147-152.
11. Lind N.M., Moustgaard A., Jelsing J., Vajta G., Cumming P., Hansen A.K. The use of pig in neuroscience: modeling brain disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2007, 31:728-751.
12. Okada Y., Laehteenmaek A., Xu C. Comparison of MEG and EEG on the basis of somatic evoked responses elicited by stimulation of the snout in the juvenile swine. Clin Neurophysiol 1999, 110:214-229.
13. Saito T., Bjarkam C.R., Nakamura M., Nemoto T. Determination of stereotaxic coordinates for the hippocampus in domestic pig. J Neurosci Methods 1998, 80:29-36.
14. Saito T., Fujiwara S.-E., Sasaki Y., Niwa K., Nemoto T., Kasuya E., et al. Measurement of hippocampal neural activity by radiotelemetry in unrestrained piglets. Jpn Agric Res Q 2009, 43:247-254.
15. Saito T., Fujiwara S.-E., Hisakura K., Ohkohchi N., Akema T., Sasamori S., et al. Telemetry system for recording neural activities in pigs-comparison with cable system. Brain Res Bull 2011, 84:103-109.
16. Sauleau P., Lapouble E., Val-Laillet D., Malbert C.-H. The pig model in brain imaging and neurosurgery. Animal 2009, 3:1138-1151.
17. Strong E.B., Rafii A., Holhweg-Majert B., Fuller S.C., Metzger M.C. Comparison of 3 optical navigation systems for computer-aided maxillofacial surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008, 134:1080-1084.
18. Swindle M.M. Swine in the laboratory-surgery, anesthesia, imaging, and experimental techniques 2007, CRC Press, Florida, USA.
19. Watanabe E., Watanabe T., Manaka S., Mayanagi Y., Takakura K. Three-dimensional digitizer (neuronavigator): new equipment for computed tomography-guided stereotaxic surgery. Surg Neurol 1987, 27:543-547.
20. Watanabe H., Andersen F., Simonsen C.Z., Evans S.M., Gjedde A., Cumming P., et al. MR-based statistical atlas of the Goettingen minipig brain. Neuroimage 2001, 14:1089-1096.
21. White E., Woolley M., Bienemann A., Johnson D.E., Wyatt M., Murray G., et al. A robust MRI-compatible system to facilitate highly accurate stereotactic administration of therapeutic agents to targets within the brain of a large animal model. J Neurosci Methods 2011, 195:78-87.
22. Wiles A.D., Thompson D.G., Frantz D.D. Accuracy assessment and interpretation for optical tacking system. Medical imaging 2004 proceeding 5367, visualization, image-guided procedures, and display 2004, The International Society for Optics and Photonics.
23. Willems P.W.A., Berkelbach van der Sprenkel J.W., Tulleken C.A.F., Viergever M.A., Taphoorn M.J.B. Neuronavigation and surgery of intracerebral tumours. J Neurol 2006, 253:1123-1136.