Comparison of 3 optical navigation systems for computer-aided maxillofacial surgery

Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Volumn 134, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1080-1084

  Strong, E Bradley ^a   Rafii, Amir ^a   Holhweg Majert, Bettina ^b   Fuller, Scott C ^a   Metzger, Marc Christian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CADAVER; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CRANIOFACIAL MORPHOLOGY; HEAD; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY; OPTICS; SKULL; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

CADAVER; FACE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAXILLA; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; NEURONAVIGATION; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGERY, ORAL;

EID: 54349117231     PISSN: 08864470     EISSN: 08864470     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.134.10.1080     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Binder WJ, Kaye A. Reconstruction of posttraumatic and congenital facial deformities with three-dimensional computer-assisted custom-designed implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;94(6):775-785.
2. Eufinger H, Wittkampf ARM, Wehmöller M, Zonneveld FW. Single-step fronto-orbital resection and reconstruction with individual resection template and corresponding titanium implant: a new method of computer-aided surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1998;26(6):373-378.
3. Gellrich NC, Schramm A, Hammer B, et al. Computer-assisted secondary reconstruction of unilateral posttraumatic orbital deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110(6):1417-1429.
4. West JB, Fitzpatrick JM, Toms SA, Maurer CR Jr, Maciunas RJ. Fiducial point placement and the accuracy of point-based, rigid body registration. Neurosurgery. 2001;48(4):810-817.
5. Maurer CR Jr, Maciunas RJ, Fitzpatrick JM, et al. Registration of head CT images to physical space using a weighted combination of points and surfaces. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998;17(5):753-761.
6. Birkfellner W, Solar P, Gahleitner A. In-vitro assessment of a registration protocol for image guided implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12(1):69-78.
7. Fitzpatrick JM, West JB. The distribution of target registration error in rigid-body point-based registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001;20(9):917-927.
8. Strauss G, Hofer M, Korb W, et al. Accuracy and precision in the evaluation of computer assisted surgical systems: a definition [in German]. HNO. 2006;54(2):78-84.
9. Metson R, Gliklich RE, Cosenza M, et al. A comparison of image guidance systems for sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 1998;108(8 pt 1):1164-1170.
10. Fried MP, Kleefield J, Gopal H, Reardon E, Ho BT, Kuhn FA. Image-guided endoscopic surgery: results of accuracy and performance in a multicenter clinical study using an electromagnetic tracking system. Laryngoscope. 1997;107(5):594-601.